𝔸𝕎ℙ𝕚𝕗𝕪 — CS2 Stats

GR76561198303862333[U:1:343596605]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

579Tracked matches53%Win rate2023Tracked since

1,167Hours in CS24Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player

Premier CS Rating22,442Top 25% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#51519 of 261506 tracked

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Nov 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 22,442 → 22,442

+26Tracked matches · now 579

+3.3ppWin rate · 50.0% → 53.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,442 -4,098 31 Aug – 1 Nov · 11 days played

29,467Peak Premier in tracked matches

37Days played since 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

6,925 below peak (29,367)
0 over 30 days · steady
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,558 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-09-02
Pink band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 7 median	Level 8 median	vs Level 8
Headshot rate	37.9%	45.7%	46.8%	8.9% short
Shot accuracy	10.8%	12.7%	13.0%	2.1% short
Kill/death ratio	1.20	1.05	1.06	above
Match win rate	49.0%	45.7%	46.3%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77

Positioning72

Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50–46–4Last 10050%Win rateWLWWLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +4.6pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 19%
Avg reaction 494ms

Last 10

7–3 · 70% win rate
Avg rating 0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 494ms

Last 20

12–8 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 513ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim7.7

Utility2.9

Positioning7.2

Opening Duels6.4

Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7

Positioning7.2

Utility2.9

Mechanics6.0

Opening Duels8.2

Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time522ms+105ms

first ⅓ avg 416ms → last ⅓ avg 522ms

Headshot accuracy16.5%−7.8%

first ⅓ avg 24.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–13 · mirage, 9 Sept →

74%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · mirage, 9 Sept →

180msFastest reaction time · 0–6 · dust2, 7 Sept →

13–0Biggest win · mirage, 5 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak

6–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 5infernoWeakest map · 46% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	42	23–19	55%	0.06
dust2	B	24	12–12	50%	0.02
inferno	B	13	6–7	46%	0.03
anubis	B	6	3–3	50%	0.06
ancient	A	5	3–2	60%	0.07
nuke	—	4	3–1	75%	-0.00
cache	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.03
vertigo	—	2	0–2	0%	0.06
fachwerk	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.07
office	—	1	0–1	0%	0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (46% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

28,811Lifetime kills

1.20K/D · Top 25% of Level 7 players

1,628Matches

49.0%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 7 players

37.9%Headshot %

10.8%Shot accuracy

4,603MVPs

568Hours (in match)

1,660Bombs planted

340Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP8,225

AK-474,764

SSG 082,847

M4A4 / M4A1-S2,710

P2000 / USP-S1,784

Glock-181,593

Desert Eagle1,364

AUG768

Galil AR533

SG 553532

Lifetime map wins

3,796inferno

2,893dust2

1,099vertigo

639office

386nuke

185assault

90italy

45train

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

223Matches

52%Win rate

1.21Avg K/D

86.8ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

27%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	76	54%	1.24	17.2
Mirage	40	60%	1.24	17.4
Anubis	36	44%	1.21	17.3
Inferno	33	52%	1.24	15.3
Nuke	14	43%	1.08	17.1
Ancient	10	40%	1.03	18.2
Cache	9	56%	1.24	20.2
Vertigo	3	33%	0.94	16.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy

37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.5%Spray accuracy

76.8%Counter-strafing

9.0°Preaim

521msReaction time

61.7%T opening success

64.2%CT opening success

0.39Enemies flashed / flash

10.2%Flash assists

6.47HE damage / grenade

2.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3887 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

46% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–11	0.12	25%	13 Nov →
mirage	12–16	-0.03	17%	10 Nov →
mirage	16–14	-0.02	19%	7 Nov →
dust2	13–7	0.03	11%	7 Nov →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	20%	6 Nov →
dust2	13–3	0.05	20%	5 Nov →
dust2	13–11	0.04	14%	5 Nov →
mirage	5–13	0.05	28%	5 Nov →
anubis	13–4	0.12	13%	5 Nov →
mirage	13–0	0.08	11%	5 Nov →
inferno	13–5	0.12	15%	5 Nov →
ancient	13–8	0.10	10%	4 Nov →
inferno	7–13	-0.07	3%	4 Nov →
mirage	13–3	0.08	15%	4 Nov →
anubis	9–13	0.02	13%	4 Nov →
mirage	13–9	0.04	23%	3 Nov →
fachwerk	6–13	-0.07	16%	31 Oct →
dust2	2–13	-0.03	8%	31 Oct →
mirage	3–13	0.03	15%	31 Oct →
dust2	13–4	0.04	15%	31 Oct →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	12%	31 Oct →
anubis	8–13	0.03	17%	28 Oct →
inferno	9–3	0.20	19%	28 Oct →
inferno	13–10	0.04	10%	27 Oct →
cache	20–22	-0.00	14%	24 Oct →
dust2	13–3	0.11	34%	24 Oct →
dust2	16–13	-0.01	18%	21 Oct →
dust2	16–12	0.00	7%	21 Oct →
anubis	6–13	0.03	20%	20 Oct →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	20%	19 Oct →
dust2	2–13	-0.06	37%	17 Oct →
inferno	13–10	0.03	18%	17 Oct →
nuke	13–11	-0.07	7%	17 Oct →
cache	16–19	-0.06	18%	14 Oct →
dust2	13–1	0.04	18%	11 Oct →
anubis	13–1	0.05	21%	11 Oct →
dust2	7–13	-0.09	8%	11 Oct →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	19%	11 Oct →
nuke	13–11	-0.04	13%	10 Oct →
dust2	25–22	-0.02	20%	10 Oct →
dust2	11–0	0.10	40%	9 Oct →
nuke	12–16	-0.01	21%	8 Oct →
nuke	13–6	0.10	14%	8 Oct →
inferno	11–13	-0.06	17%	8 Oct →
dust2	13–7	0.04	16%	4 Oct →
dust2	1–13	-0.01	20%	30 Sept →
inferno	13–9	0.09	20%	30 Sept →
dust2	8–13	0.13	35%	25 Sept →
mirage	6–13	0.00	13%	25 Sept →
vertigo	12–12	0.03	18%	23 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.07	18%	23 Sept →
office	3–13	0.06	23%	23 Sept →
anubis	13–7	0.08	18%	21 Sept →
inferno	6–13	-0.07	25%	20 Sept →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	11%	16 Sept →
mirage	9–13	0.24	74%	9 Sept →
vertigo	9–13	0.08	23%	9 Sept →
ancient	0–12	-0.01	25%	8 Sept →
mirage	13–8	0.13	44%	8 Sept →
mirage	2–13	0.03	45%	8 Sept →
mirage	13–9	0.10	58%	7 Sept →
inferno	4–0	0.18	67%	7 Sept →
mirage	2–2	0.07	38%	7 Sept →
ancient	13–0	0.02	25%	7 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	36%	7 Sept →
ancient	5–13	0.04	48%	7 Sept →
dust2	0–6	-0.02	17%	7 Sept →
mirage	5–13	0.14	43%	6 Sept →
mirage	7–1	-0.05	50%	6 Sept →
mirage	13–5	0.17	13%	6 Sept →
mirage	1–13	0.00	43%	6 Sept →
mirage	0–13	-0.04	50%	6 Sept →
mirage	13–4	0.01	31%	5 Sept →
mirage	2–13	-0.02	19%	5 Sept →
mirage	13–6	0.08	26%	5 Sept →
mirage	13–1	0.11	0%	5 Sept →
mirage	13–9	0.12	18%	5 Sept →
mirage	2–9	0.02	30%	5 Sept →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	18%	5 Sept →
mirage	13–2	0.11	44%	5 Sept →
mirage	13–8	0.13	34%	4 Sept →
mirage	11–13	0.10	17%	4 Sept →
mirage	12–12	0.03	21%	4 Sept →
mirage	11–2	0.03	8%	3 Sept →
mirage	12–12	0.19	25%	3 Sept →
mirage	13–8	0.12	16%	3 Sept →
mirage	13–5	0.04	20%	3 Sept →
ancient	13–10	0.23	11%	3 Sept →
dust2	2–13	0.13	28%	3 Sept →
mirage	13–10	0.11	19%	3 Sept →
inferno	8–8	0.03	20%	2 Sept →
mirage	13–4	0.07	20%	2 Sept →
mirage	13–4	0.10	37%	2 Sept →
inferno	3–13	0.07	28%	2 Sept →
mirage	3–13	0.00	19%	2 Sept →
dust2	13–7	0.09	21%	1 Sept →
inferno	3–13	-0.09	5%	1 Sept →
mirage	13–8	0.09	25%	1 Sept →
dust2	3–13	0.00	26%	1 Sept →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	19%	31 Aug →