markseN

markseN — CS2 Stats

76561198303856494[U:1:343590766]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,418Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,269Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#36328 of 261577 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,755 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,690 -215 4 Aug – 8 Sept · 22 days played
21,66025,118peak 25,1184 Aug8 Sept
25,382Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,755Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
23Days played since 2026-08-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,755
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 246 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate42.4%46.8%48.2%5.8% short
Shot accuracy12.9%13.0%13.2%0.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.011.061.070.06 short
Match win rate48.4%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmarkseNFACEITLevel 8 · 1,755 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,755csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning50
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–49Last 10051%Win rateLLWLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +1.5pp headshot accuracy · +48ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 512ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility5.2
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.0
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time492ms−80ms
first ⅓ avg 572ms → last ⅓ avg 492ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–6 · nuke, 22 Aug →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · dust2, 17 Aug →
328msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · ancient, 30 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 18 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 72% over 18mirageWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2714–1352%0.02
dust2B2311–1248%-0.01
ancientS1813–572%0.02
anubisA1610–663%0.01
mirageD92–722%-0.02
cache—41–325%-0.01
inferno—20–20%-0.02
vertigo—10–10%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

60,570Lifetime kills
1.01K/D
3,221Matches
48.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
42.4%Headshot %
12.9%Shot accuracy
7,836MVPs
1,269Hours (in match)
1,976Bombs planted
748Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4720,517
AWP5,845
FAMAS1,394
MP91,227
P2501,212

Lifetime map wins

8,450dust2
7,679nuke
1,158inferno
764vertigo
528train
104cbble
93safehouse
75lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

443Matches
55%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
83.0ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust29957%1.0815.7
Mirage6253%1.0416.3
Nuke6268%1.2316.7
Ancient4646%0.9415.7
Anubis3450%1.0615.5
Train850%0.8816.0
Vertigo757%1.0614.6
Inferno757%0.8714.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy
39.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
47.3%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
490msReaction time
28.8%T opening success
54.3%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
10.08HE damage / grenade
6.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4746 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.7701% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient2–13-0.0817%30 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0211%8 Sept →
ancient13–90.0215%5 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0432%5 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0119%4 Sept →
anubis13–90.0614%4 Sept →
dust213–100.0212%3 Sept →
ancient13–110.0318%3 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0221%3 Sept →
dust213–70.0613%3 Sept →
nuke16–14-0.018%3 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0513%2 Sept →
anubis13–40.1014%2 Sept →
dust213–80.0212%2 Sept →
anubis13–80.0723%1 Sept →
nuke13–40.0823%1 Sept →
dust24–110.0319%31 Aug →
anubis13–70.0216%31 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0220%31 Aug →
ancient13–60.1010%31 Aug →
cache2–130.0525%31 Aug →
ancient11–130.0414%31 Aug →
dust213–4-0.0518%30 Aug →
nuke12–16-0.0215%30 Aug →
nuke14–160.0114%29 Aug →
nuke6–130.0311%29 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0124%28 Aug →
nuke13–70.0514%28 Aug →
nuke16–14-0.0220%28 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0510%28 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0613%28 Aug →
anubis13–90.0312%28 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0812%25 Aug →
nuke13–100.0915%25 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0225%25 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0616%24 Aug →
nuke13–100.0118%24 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0512%24 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0211%22 Aug →
nuke13–60.1717%22 Aug →
ancient13–60.087%22 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0115%22 Aug →
ancient13–70.0917%22 Aug →
anubis1–13-0.1110%22 Aug →
ancient13–50.079%20 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0014%20 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.018%20 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.0116%20 Aug →
nuke13–20.0019%20 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0014%18 Aug →
nuke13–100.059%18 Aug →
anubis13–10.0113%18 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.059%17 Aug →
mirage11–130.0417%17 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.1110%17 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0415%17 Aug →
ancient13–110.0810%17 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.038%17 Aug →
dust213–50.0532%17 Aug →
mirage5–130.015%17 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0532%13 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0115%13 Aug →
nuke10–130.0316%13 Aug →
nuke11–130.0325%13 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0122%13 Aug →
vertigo3–9-0.0917%13 Aug →
anubis13–16-0.0711%13 Aug →
dust213–20.0328%11 Aug →
dust213–60.0315%11 Aug →
dust25–1-0.0617%11 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.0317%11 Aug →
nuke8–130.0810%11 Aug →
ancient13–100.0525%11 Aug →
cache7–13-0.019%11 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0312%11 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0322%11 Aug →
dust213–40.0121%11 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.085%11 Aug →
dust22–130.0216%11 Aug →
nuke13–70.0316%11 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0120%11 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0112%10 Aug →
anubis13–160.0215%10 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0116%10 Aug →
dust213–4-0.0315%10 Aug →
ancient13–80.0418%10 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0412%10 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0218%6 Aug →
nuke13–90.0815%6 Aug →
ancient13–50.0312%6 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0115%5 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0222%5 Aug →
nuke16–130.0822%5 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.039%5 Aug →
anubis13–20.0214%5 Aug →
dust26–130.0214%5 Aug →
ancient16–130.0314%5 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.0613%4 Aug →
nuke13–80.0528%4 Aug →
anubis13–110.0526%4 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.