salez1an

salez1an — CS2 Stats

SK76561198782763619[U:1:822497891]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

831Tracked matches57%Win rate2025Tracked since
730Hours in CS17Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating15,734Purple band · top ~25.5% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+734Premier CS Rating · 15,000 → 15,734

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,734 +3,866 1 Sept – 14 Nov · 32 days played
11,54416,640peak 16,6401 Sept14 Nov
16,836Peak Premier in tracked matches
34Days played since 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 906 below peak (16,640)
  • -263 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,266 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=37,767), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate45.3%44.4%46.9%1.6% short
Shot accuracy0.0%11.9%13.0%13.0% short
Kill/death ratio0.921.031.080.16 short
Match win rate47.8%45.2%46.7%above

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsalez1anPREMIER15,734 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning50
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59–39–2Last 10059%Win rateLWWWWLWTTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.5pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

  • 6–2–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 20

  • 11–7–2 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility6.5
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.2

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning5.0
Utility6.5
Mechanics4.1
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact7.4

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.06
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time543ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 560ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%+3.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–1 · inferno, 1 Oct →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · ancient, 17 Oct →
406msFastest reaction time · 9–1 · vertigo, 31 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 1 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5ancientWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3118–1358%0.02
mirageA2313–1057%0.04
infernoA117–464%0.02
anubisS118–373%-0.02
ancientD93–633%-0.00
nukeA95–456%0.04
cacheS54–180%0.09
vertigo—11–0100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

14,525Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
915Matches
47.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Purple band
45.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Purple band
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,335MVPs
364Hours (in match)
1,019Bombs planted
262Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,417dust2
1,238nuke
824inferno
114train
50vertigo
13office
6ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.7%Spray accuracy
68.5%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
550msReaction time
47.2%T opening success
43.4%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
9.56HE damage / grenade
8.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–13-0.0225%14 Nov →
mirage13–6-0.0315%14 Nov →
anubis13–7-0.0518%14 Nov →
ancient13–8-0.0010%14 Nov →
mirage13–6-0.0215%14 Nov →
ancient8–13-0.0321%12 Nov →
dust213–9-0.0612%12 Nov →
anubis15–15-0.0519%12 Nov →
ancient12–12-0.0213%11 Nov →
mirage13–80.0111%11 Nov →
inferno13–11-0.0623%10 Nov →
mirage4–13-0.0120%10 Nov →
dust213–4-0.006%9 Nov →
ancient1–13-0.054%5 Nov →
dust213–110.0215%5 Nov →
mirage9–130.0417%4 Nov →
inferno13–11-0.0526%4 Nov →
anubis10–130.0023%4 Nov →
cache9–13-0.075%3 Nov →
dust213–5-0.0015%3 Nov →
dust26–13-0.0410%3 Nov →
dust210–13-0.0131%31 Oct →
vertigo9–10.0633%31 Oct →
mirage13–50.0331%30 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0325%29 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0329%29 Oct →
anubis13–50.0017%29 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0629%24 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0627%22 Oct →
anubis13–40.0325%19 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0228%19 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0525%17 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0635%17 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0416%17 Oct →
dust213–60.1026%17 Oct →
inferno13–90.1425%10 Oct →
dust213–80.0324%8 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0327%8 Oct →
dust210–130.0617%3 Oct →
dust211–130.0715%3 Oct →
inferno13–70.0319%3 Oct →
mirage11–130.1112%1 Oct →
inferno13–10.2017%1 Oct →
nuke13–90.0714%1 Oct →
mirage13–70.1324%1 Oct →
mirage10–130.0814%30 Sept →
mirage13–60.059%30 Sept →
dust213–20.0215%30 Sept →
inferno13–90.0320%30 Sept →
dust211–130.0120%29 Sept →
inferno13–60.0610%29 Sept →
inferno8–130.0111%29 Sept →
ancient13–50.1013%28 Sept →
mirage13–70.1415%28 Sept →
nuke13–20.0121%28 Sept →
mirage4–130.079%28 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0210%24 Sept →
ancient13–100.0216%24 Sept →
cache13–60.1013%24 Sept →
mirage6–130.015%24 Sept →
dust213–110.1112%24 Sept →
anubis13–110.0515%24 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0418%23 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.087%23 Sept →
dust24–13-0.107%23 Sept →
dust213–70.0615%23 Sept →
mirage13–50.0616%18 Sept →
dust213–40.048%18 Sept →
mirage9–130.0414%18 Sept →
cache13–80.0815%18 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0529%17 Sept →
dust216–130.0214%17 Sept →
cache13–40.1617%17 Sept →
dust213–50.1225%17 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0018%15 Sept →
cache13–50.1513%15 Sept →
dust213–100.1312%15 Sept →
mirage13–70.1116%13 Sept →
dust210–130.0827%13 Sept →
mirage9–130.0115%13 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0016%7 Sept →
nuke13–50.0612%7 Sept →
nuke8–130.0820%7 Sept →
mirage13–30.1618%7 Sept →
mirage13–70.0713%7 Sept →
dust213–110.0823%7 Sept →
dust213–50.0721%7 Sept →
nuke11–130.1416%7 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0124%6 Sept →
dust213–8-0.038%6 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0613%6 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0317%6 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.0810%6 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0419%4 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0229%4 Sept →
nuke7–130.0319%3 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0324%3 Sept →
ancient11–130.0418%2 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.024%2 Sept →
anubis13–100.0212%1 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.