Unavailable

Unavailable — CS2 Stats

NZ76561198294770250[U:1:334504522]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,626Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,800Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,686Top 25% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#24990 of 251234 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,056 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,686 +2,458 28 Aug – 8 Oct · 24 days played
21,37825,512peak 25,51228 Aug8 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,056 +0 2 Sept – 8 Sept · 2 observations
2,0562,056peak 2,0562 Sept8 Sept
25,512Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,056Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,056
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 444 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 826 below peak (25,512)
  • +3,193 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 314 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches74——
Win rate59%——
K/D1.13——
Headshot %42%——

Measured 12 Sep 2026 → 11 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,332), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate39.2%48.2%50.9%11.8% short
Shot accuracy13.7%13.3%13.7%meets
Kill/death ratio1.091.071.09meets
Match win rate48.5%46.9%48.4%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGUnavailableFACEITLevel 9 · 2,056 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,686 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,056csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94
Positioning67
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT56–42–2Last 10056%Win rateLWWWLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.9pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 481ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 470ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 465ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim9.4
Utility3.8
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4
Positioning6.7
Utility3.8
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels5.9
Win Impact6.7

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time465ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 493ms → last ⅓ avg 465ms
Headshot accuracy22.2%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 5–13 · mirage, 26 Sept →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · mirage, 16 Sept →
328msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · inferno, 18 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 12 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
9–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 12anubisWeakest map · 45% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3217–1553%0.02
dust2A1911–858%0.03
cacheA127–558%0.02
infernoS128–467%0.02
anubisB115–645%0.01
nukeB84–450%0.02
ancientA53–260%-0.01
vertigo—11–0100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

159,202Lifetime kills
1.09K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
7,903Matches
48.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
39.2%Headshot %
13.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
17,864MVPs
3,276Hours (in match)
6,698Bombs planted
2,115Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP48,610
AK-4730,914
SSG 085,284
MP93,330
MAC-102,745
Knife2,154

Lifetime map wins

19,683dust2
11,819inferno
3,648nuke
2,311vertigo
1,793train
1,117cbble
249office
156lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

886Matches
53%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
76.1ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage18651%1.0716.2
Dust210452%1.1015.2
Ancient6247%0.8914.8
Inferno5860%1.1115.9
Anubis4753%1.0215.8
Nuke3850%1.0214.5
Vertigo2471%1.3619.5
Overpass2065%0.9713.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.9%Headshot accuracy
40.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.8%Spray accuracy
82.8%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
470msReaction time
55.8%T opening success
51.5%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
1.8%Flash assists
10.48HE damage / grenade
4.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4709 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–13-0.0524%10 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0110%10 Oct →
anubis13–80.0113%10 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0419%10 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0018%9 Oct →
cache13–16-0.0418%9 Oct →
nuke13–60.0522%8 Oct →
dust213–20.0636%8 Oct →
dust213–10.0564%8 Oct →
mirage16–140.1025%7 Oct →
anubis13–80.0111%6 Oct →
dust211–130.0519%6 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0318%5 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0412%4 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0224%3 Oct →
inferno13–60.0018%3 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0121%3 Oct →
inferno13–100.0235%2 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0118%2 Oct →
inferno11–130.0224%30 Sept →
mirage16–120.0520%30 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0632%28 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0116%27 Sept →
mirage10–130.0421%27 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0314%27 Sept →
dust213–80.0526%26 Sept →
mirage5–130.1128%26 Sept →
cache13–60.0432%26 Sept →
cache10–130.0518%25 Sept →
cache13–60.0318%24 Sept →
mirage11–130.1018%24 Sept →
inferno13–110.0515%24 Sept →
anubis4–130.0525%23 Sept →
nuke13–80.0737%23 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.0740%22 Sept →
mirage13–110.0428%22 Sept →
mirage13–100.1013%21 Sept →
cache13–80.0018%20 Sept →
ancient9–00.0627%20 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0222%20 Sept →
dust213–110.0523%19 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0015%19 Sept →
mirage8–130.0328%19 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0615%19 Sept →
dust22–120.0940%19 Sept →
inferno13–50.0618%18 Sept →
mirage13–20.0831%18 Sept →
cache10–130.0426%17 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.0367%16 Sept →
dust213–60.1040%15 Sept →
mirage13–60.0032%15 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0213%14 Sept →
mirage13–70.0111%14 Sept →
dust25–130.0426%13 Sept →
inferno13–50.0222%13 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.059%13 Sept →
dust25–130.0515%13 Sept →
dust27–130.0625%12 Sept →
mirage13–00.0460%12 Sept →
mirage13–30.0224%12 Sept →
anubis13–10.0927%12 Sept →
dust213–90.0724%12 Sept →
dust213–00.0820%11 Sept →
dust213–90.007%11 Sept →
mirage13–80.0923%11 Sept →
dust213–50.0519%11 Sept →
mirage13–100.0315%11 Sept →
cache4–130.0321%10 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0213%10 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0113%9 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0214%8 Sept →
cache13–80.0834%8 Sept →
nuke6–130.0143%7 Sept →
inferno13–100.0437%7 Sept →
nuke17–19-0.0212%7 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0115%6 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0016%6 Sept →
anubis7–130.015%6 Sept →
mirage20–22-0.0214%6 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0522%5 Sept →
inferno13–40.0934%5 Sept →
anubis13–100.0122%5 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0325%4 Sept →
cache13–110.0217%4 Sept →
mirage7–130.0522%4 Sept →
mirage13–100.0625%4 Sept →
ancient11–130.0220%3 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0026%3 Sept →
nuke13–50.0721%3 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0321%2 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0510%2 Sept →
vertigo16–140.0516%1 Sept →
mirage14–160.0216%31 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0417%31 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0415%29 Aug →
anubis16–13-0.0110%29 Aug →
cache16–140.0224%29 Aug →
mirage13–100.0114%29 Aug →
inferno13–60.0318%29 Aug →
mirage15–15-0.0214%28 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.