mazda enjoyer

mazda enjoyer — CS2 Stats

76561198167320617[U:1:207054889]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,444Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,945Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,510Top 50% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#60798 of 251238 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,077 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Oct 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,510 +930 16 Aug – 1 Oct · 40 days played
18,38523,780peak 23,78016 Aug1 Oct
24,095Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,077Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-08-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,077
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 124 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,270 below peak (23,780)
  • +1,018 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,490 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,649), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate42.7%43.7%44.8%2.1% short
Shot accuracy11.0%12.0%12.4%1.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.131.021.03above
Match win rate43.2%44.7%45.2%2.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmazda enjoyerFACEITLevel 5 · 1,077 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER21,510 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,077csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning43
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD54–43–3Last 10054%Win rateWLLLLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −0.5pp headshot accuracy · +89ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 714ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 650ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.2 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility5.8
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels0.4
Clutch0.0

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 622ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning4.3
Utility5.8
Mechanics9.1
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time618ms+76ms
first ⅓ avg 542ms → last ⅓ avg 618ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%+3.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–0 · dust2, 11 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · mirage, 16 Sept →
383msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · mirage, 16 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 12 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

13Longest win streak
12–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 29% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3216–1650%0.01
dust2S2819–968%0.03
infernoD175–1229%0.01
cacheA106–460%0.03
nukeA53–260%-0.02
ancientS54–180%-0.01
anubis—31–233%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

81,774Lifetime kills
1.13K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
4,064Matches
43.2%Match win rate
42.7%Headshot %
11.0%Shot accuracy
8,479MVPs
1,945Hours (in match)
5,210Bombs planted
1,279Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,237
AWP14,795
P2501,641
P901,235
SSG 081,079
Negev1,022

Lifetime map wins

14,273dust2
8,437inferno
1,040nuke
328vertigo
191train
96office
85cbble
44lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

11Matches
55%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
85.8ADR
23%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.3%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
91.1%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
622msReaction time
37.1%T opening success
31.2%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
14.61HE damage / grenade
11.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.133% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–2-0.0332%1 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0135%30 Sept →
mirage11–130.0233%28 Sept →
cache1–13-0.050%25 Sept →
nuke14–16-0.0218%25 Sept →
ancient13–20.1130%24 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0236%24 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0333%23 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.068%23 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0423%23 Sept →
mirage9–130.0418%23 Sept →
inferno13–70.1031%23 Sept →
cache16–130.0320%22 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0016%22 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0429%21 Sept →
inferno9–130.0126%20 Sept →
dust213–30.0622%20 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0216%19 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.0750%16 Sept →
dust213–60.0524%15 Sept →
mirage13–70.0214%14 Sept →
mirage7–2-0.100%13 Sept →
mirage13–00.0025%12 Sept →
mirage13–30.0120%12 Sept →
anubis13–10.1219%12 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.019%12 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0319%12 Sept →
dust213–00.1330%11 Sept →
dust213–90.0327%11 Sept →
mirage13–80.0136%11 Sept →
dust213–50.0418%11 Sept →
dust213–60.0734%11 Sept →
mirage8–130.0321%10 Sept →
dust213–50.0836%10 Sept →
dust28–130.0129%9 Sept →
dust213–100.0519%9 Sept →
dust214–160.0840%8 Sept →
cache13–20.0513%8 Sept →
dust213–60.0812%7 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0119%7 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.058%7 Sept →
mirage8–130.1120%6 Sept →
cache13–110.0925%4 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0111%4 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0422%4 Sept →
inferno9–130.0117%4 Sept →
cache4–130.0934%3 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0211%3 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0443%2 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0014%2 Sept →
mirage11–130.0224%2 Sept →
mirage16–130.0714%1 Sept →
dust213–50.0216%1 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0514%1 Sept →
inferno13–60.0740%1 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0219%31 Aug →
mirage16–140.0916%31 Aug →
dust213–100.0818%31 Aug →
mirage9–130.0335%31 Aug →
ancient13–16-0.0618%30 Aug →
mirage9–130.0224%30 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0014%29 Aug →
nuke13–60.019%29 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0010%29 Aug →
inferno13–60.0527%29 Aug →
mirage15–15-0.0217%28 Aug →
dust215–150.0723%28 Aug →
nuke16–14-0.0110%28 Aug →
inferno10–3-0.0110%28 Aug →
mirage13–110.0113%28 Aug →
inferno15–150.0611%28 Aug →
mirage13–90.1127%27 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0323%27 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0016%27 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0021%26 Aug →
mirage7–130.0223%26 Aug →
dust213–80.0514%25 Aug →
cache13–80.0136%25 Aug →
dust213–11-0.034%24 Aug →
mirage16–120.0424%24 Aug →
cache13–60.0625%24 Aug →
dust213–160.0716%23 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0626%23 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0020%22 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0530%22 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0411%22 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0133%22 Aug →
mirage14–160.0120%21 Aug →
mirage6–2-0.0317%21 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0412%21 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0615%21 Aug →
dust213–50.064%21 Aug →
mirage4–130.0027%20 Aug →
mirage13–80.0224%20 Aug →
inferno13–110.0229%20 Aug →
mirage13–10.078%20 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0839%20 Aug →
mirage9–130.0817%18 Aug →
cache10–130.0421%17 Aug →
dust214–16-0.0224%16 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches13-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.