Zeno

Zeno — CS2 Stats

JM76561198286135403[U:1:325869675]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,941Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,598Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,281Top 50% of 215,558 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#67161 of 261648 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,468 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Nov 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,281 -2,636 24 Jun – 9 Nov · 39 days played
19,71224,999peak 24,99924 Jun9 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,468 +0 1 Sept – 4 Sept · 2 observations
1,4681,468peak 1,4681 Sept4 Sept
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,468Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
50Days played since 2026-06-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,468
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 63 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,718 below peak (24,999)
  • +489 over 30 days · improving
  • +216 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,719 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,878), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate45.8%46.8%48.2%2.4% short
Shot accuracy3.1%13.0%13.2%10.1% short
Kill/death ratio0.901.061.070.17 short
Match win rate48.1%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZenoFACEITLevel 8 · 1,468 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,281 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,468csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning40
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48–48–4Last 10048%Win rateLLWTWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −2.1pp headshot accuracy · −62ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 612ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility5.1
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch4.4

Effective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 43 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 619ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning4.0
Utility5.1
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time614ms−66ms
first ⅓ avg 681ms → last ⅓ avg 614ms
Headshot accuracy21.3%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 19.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 1 Aug →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 9–1 · inferno, 1 Aug →
461msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 15 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 19 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
11–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 86% over 7nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2715–1256%-0.01
dust2D268–1831%-0.03
ancientC177–1041%-0.00
cacheA117–464%0.01
anubisS76–186%0.02
infernoB63–350%0.03
nukeD51–420%-0.00
stronghold—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

63,742Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
3,665Matches
48.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
45.8%Headshot %
3.1%Shot accuracy
9,037MVPs
1,785Hours (in match)
4,524Bombs planted
2,441Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4723,514
AWP5,082
Negev4,211
G3SG12,885
SSG 082,692
FAMAS2,373

Lifetime map wins

11,968dust2
7,354inferno
3,529nuke
2,165vertigo
1,352cbble
1,287train
233lake
164office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

769Matches
51%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
72.5ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage26254%1.0114.8
Dust212848%0.9713.9
Ancient8252%0.9314.1
Anubis8048%0.9614.5
Inferno6552%1.0515.3
Cache3650%0.9515.2
Nuke3453%1.0115.2
Vertigo2055%1.1216.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.7%Spray accuracy
86.4%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
619msReaction time
32.1%T opening success
36.5%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
12.53HE damage / grenade
3.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.9015 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.1254% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient14–160.0219%12 Nov →
mirage11–13-0.069%9 Nov →
anubis13–110.0522%8 Nov →
nuke15–150.0220%23 Oct →
cache13–4-0.0126%20 Oct →
ancient13–30.0832%20 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0514%16 Oct →
ancient6–130.0123%15 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0717%3 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0123%2 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0111%1 Oct →
mirage16–120.0113%28 Sept →
cache13–90.0217%28 Sept →
inferno3–130.0035%12 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0431%12 Sept →
dust213–80.0136%7 Sept →
cache2–13-0.0420%7 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0922%6 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0118%4 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0324%29 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0412%28 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0116%28 Aug →
dust213–5-0.0521%23 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0322%22 Aug →
nuke9–130.0017%22 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0529%21 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0619%21 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.057%20 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0229%15 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0211%15 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0832%13 Aug →
nuke13–110.0426%13 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0732%12 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0930%12 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0519%12 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0419%11 Aug →
mirage13–3-0.0124%11 Aug →
dust21–13-0.0913%9 Aug →
mirage13–110.0526%9 Aug →
dust213–50.0319%9 Aug →
dust215–150.0118%8 Aug →
mirage15–150.0413%8 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0417%5 Aug →
mirage13–70.028%5 Aug →
ancient13–60.0723%3 Aug →
cache13–50.0433%3 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0429%3 Aug →
mirage13–30.0635%3 Aug →
cache13–80.0526%1 Aug →
dust27–130.0110%1 Aug →
inferno9–10.2536%1 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0026%1 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0123%31 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.0314%29 Jul →
dust216–13-0.0219%29 Jul →
dust215–15-0.0531%28 Jul →
cache13–80.0417%28 Jul →
mirage16–13-0.0323%28 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0423%25 Jul →
dust213–60.0023%24 Jul →
cache13–110.0233%24 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0311%24 Jul →
mirage6–130.0014%24 Jul →
cache10–130.0123%19 Jul →
mirage13–10.0035%19 Jul →
anubis13–100.0724%17 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0616%17 Jul →
mirage13–50.0416%17 Jul →
dust214–16-0.0016%16 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.094%16 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0422%15 Jul →
inferno13–8-0.0114%15 Jul →
mirage13–110.0521%14 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0010%14 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0331%14 Jul →
ancient6–130.0413%14 Jul →
mirage13–110.0226%14 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0115%12 Jul →
dust22–13-0.117%12 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0112%11 Jul →
dust213–60.0017%11 Jul →
anubis13–20.1011%11 Jul →
cache7–130.0426%11 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0418%10 Jul →
dust213–8-0.0420%10 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0424%10 Jul →
ancient13–100.0316%9 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0126%8 Jul →
stronghold13–110.0420%8 Jul →
mirage13–80.0635%8 Jul →
dust29–130.0733%8 Jul →
mirage13–100.0025%6 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0223%6 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0220%3 Jul →
ancient13–50.0825%2 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0423%2 Jul →
anubis16–140.0213%25 Jun →
anubis13–10-0.0328%24 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0215%24 Jun →
ancient5–13-0.0623%24 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.