Snibbels™

Snibbels™ — CS2 Stats

DE76561198278848567[U:1:318582839]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,621Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,471Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,273Top 25% of 201,197 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#28451 of 248159 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,892 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,273 +2,061 11 Jun – 2 Oct · 18 days played
21,90224,554peak 24,55411 Jun2 Oct
24,799Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,892Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-06-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,892
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 109 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-23
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-23

Premier CS Rating

  • 281 below peak (24,554)
  • +107 over 30 days · steady
  • +1,303 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 727 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-23
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-23

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches62——
Win rate50%——
K/D0.93——
Headshot %48%——

Measured 2 Sep 2026 → 3 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,773), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate48.8%46.8%48.2%meets
Shot accuracy12.5%13.0%13.3%0.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.841.061.070.23 short
Match win rate38.4%46.3%46.9%8.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSnibbels™FACEITLevel 8 · 1,892 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER24,273 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,892csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning60
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–43–2Last 10055%Win rateWWLLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −5.4pp headshot accuracy · −0ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility5.2
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 58% on T to 41% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning6.0
Utility5.2
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time514ms−66ms
first ⅓ avg 580ms → last ⅓ avg 514ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%+4.5%
first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–8 · dust2, 3 Aug →
57%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · office, 5 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · inferno, 25 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 30 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
15–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 68% over 19mirageWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS1913–668%-0.02
dust2A148–657%0.01
infernoA148–657%-0.00
anubisB136–746%-0.03
mirageC114–736%-0.01
nukeS96–367%-0.01
cacheC83–538%0.02
vertigo—42–250%0.01
overpass—42–250%-0.04
office—32–167%-0.04
boulder—11–0100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

154,291Lifetime kills
0.84K/D
8,752Matches
38.4%Match win rate
48.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
12.5%Shot accuracy
14,973MVPs
3,444Hours (in match)
5,675Bombs planted
1,677Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4745,374
AWP27,669
SSG 084,507
MAC-102,311
P2502,238
Tec-91,905

Lifetime map wins

10,329dust2
8,099inferno
4,040cbble
1,613vertigo
1,585nuke
1,371train
547office
117safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

779Matches
52%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
69.6ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno7251%0.8913.3
Ancient6653%0.9613.4
Anubis3563%0.9313.9
Mirage3142%0.8914.4
Dust22752%0.9114.0
Vertigo1861%0.9714.6
Nuke1662%0.8114.2
Overpass1553%0.9113.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy
31.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.0%Spray accuracy
75.5%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
521msReaction time
58.0%T opening success
41.3%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
11.73HE damage / grenade
5.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4753 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis16–14-0.0619%2 Oct →
dust213–100.0129%28 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0311%28 Sept →
vertigo7–130.0713%23 Sept →
vertigo11–13-0.017%23 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0415%23 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0029%18 Sept →
dust211–130.0219%18 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0221%16 Sept →
dust213–40.0813%16 Sept →
vertigo13–11-0.0519%16 Sept →
ancient11–130.028%15 Sept →
cache4–130.0328%15 Sept →
nuke16–140.0324%14 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.028%12 Sept →
dust216–13-0.0530%12 Sept →
mirage13–60.0318%10 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0527%10 Sept →
inferno11–130.0218%9 Sept →
office2–13-0.0550%6 Sept →
office13–90.0157%5 Sept →
office13–10-0.0814%4 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0222%2 Sept →
dust213–60.0714%27 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0144%26 Aug →
nuke13–70.0116%26 Aug →
cache13–90.0135%26 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0424%26 Aug →
mirage15–19-0.0221%26 Aug →
mirage13–50.0524%26 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0913%25 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0415%25 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0517%25 Aug →
anubis13–5-0.063%13 Aug →
cache11–130.0318%10 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0128%6 Aug →
vertigo13–20.0433%6 Aug →
boulder13–5-0.0310%6 Aug →
inferno8–130.0429%5 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0016%5 Aug →
inferno13–30.0618%5 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0322%3 Aug →
dust213–80.1040%3 Aug →
dust213–50.0630%3 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0319%3 Aug →
cache13–00.0530%30 Jul →
nuke13–40.0321%27 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0514%27 Jul →
nuke15–15-0.0317%24 Jul →
inferno13–4-0.0410%20 Jul →
nuke13–110.0323%20 Jul →
inferno13–110.0634%20 Jul →
dust22–0-0.060%20 Jul →
ancient13–10-0.077%17 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0415%17 Jul →
ancient13–70.0233%11 Jul →
ancient13–2-0.0115%11 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0319%11 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0515%10 Jul →
nuke16–14-0.0115%10 Jul →
cache13–60.0247%10 Jul →
cache15–150.0122%10 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0238%9 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0020%9 Jul →
inferno13–3-0.0118%1 Jul →
inferno13–1-0.0028%1 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0210%1 Jul →
ancient16–13-0.0016%1 Jul →
anubis13–80.039%30 Jun →
ancient13–10-0.0128%30 Jun →
ancient13–20.0116%30 Jun →
nuke13–5-0.0321%30 Jun →
ancient6–13-0.0919%28 Jun →
anubis13–40.0023%28 Jun →
ancient5–13-0.0510%27 Jun →
overpass10–13-0.008%27 Jun →
mirage7–130.0121%27 Jun →
inferno13–11-0.0212%27 Jun →
inferno13–70.0026%27 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0126%27 Jun →
anubis6–13-0.0912%25 Jun →
ancient13–00.088%25 Jun →
ancient13–110.0526%24 Jun →
anubis10–13-0.0424%24 Jun →
nuke5–13-0.104%24 Jun →
anubis7–13-0.0528%22 Jun →
mirage13–4-0.0118%22 Jun →
ancient13–11-0.038%22 Jun →
anubis13–110.0022%16 Jun →
dust211–13-0.0319%16 Jun →
overpass13–6-0.0618%16 Jun →
ancient13–40.0114%16 Jun →
dust210–13-0.0423%15 Jun →
ancient4–13-0.0826%15 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0520%15 Jun →
ancient13–9-0.0812%15 Jun →
anubis8–13-0.045%15 Jun →
overpass6–13-0.067%11 Jun →
inferno13–60.0124%11 Jun →
overpass13–11-0.0222%11 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.