Inge Bock

Inge Bock — CS2 Stats

DE76561198141361088[U:1:181095360]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,047Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,177Hours in CS30Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating12,468Blue band · top ~41.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2 · 723 ELOTop 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,468 +1,077 19 Aug – 1 Oct · 25 days played
11,15613,344peak 13,34419 Aug1 Oct
13,344Peak Premier in tracked matches
723Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-08-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 723
  • Next: Level 3 at 751 — 28 to go
  • Reached: Level 2
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-23

Premier CS Rating

  • 876 below peak (13,344)
  • +55 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,532 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-23
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-23

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches97——
Win rate46%——
K/D0.65——
Headshot %44%——

Measured 5 Sep 2026 → 3 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,923), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate42.7%41.3%41.8%above
Shot accuracy6.4%12.7%12.2%5.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.670.950.980.31 short
Match win rate36.4%42.6%43.3%6.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGInge BockFACEITLevel 2 · 723 ELOSTANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER12,468 · Blue bandPEAK ELO723csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim48
Positioning56
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–50Last 10050%Win rateLLWWWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −4.3pp headshot accuracy · +67ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 593ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim4.8
Utility5.2
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 70% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.8
Positioning5.6
Utility5.2
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time577ms+23ms
first ⅓ avg 554ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy13.4%−2.9%
first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 13.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 8–4 · rush_001, 30 Sept →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · overpass, 1 Sept →
359msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · anubis, 31 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 17 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
5–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 24infernoWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2416–867%-0.04
nukeA2212–1055%-0.03
anubisD165–1131%-0.01
mirageC104–640%-0.02
cacheA85–363%-0.03
ancientD72–529%-0.05
infernoD51–420%-0.04
rush_001—44–0100%0.03
vertigo—21–150%-0.04
office—10–10%-0.04
overpass—10–10%-0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

24,216Lifetime kills
0.67K/D
1,851Matches
36.4%Match win rate
42.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 2 players
6.4%Shot accuracy
2,055MVPs
692Hours (in match)
1,433Bombs planted
226Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,169dust2
1,810inferno
1,616nuke
1,258vertigo
276train
273office
58cbble
40lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

104Matches
42%Win rate
0.71Avg K/D
61.7ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

17%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22952%0.7612.6
Nuke1753%0.6811.1
Anubis1625%0.7313.6
Mirage1217%0.5910.3
Inferno944%0.7512.3
Cache944%0.7211.6
Overpass771%0.6611.6
Vertigo333%0.5610.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.2%Headshot accuracy
29.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.0%Spray accuracy
76.4%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
583msReaction time
45.0%T opening success
38.8%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
7.93HE damage / grenade
9.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.24% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.8169% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno10–13-0.088%1 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0311%1 Oct →
rush_0015–1-0.120%30 Sept →
rush_0018–40.174%30 Sept →
rush_0017–30.0220%30 Sept →
rush_0018–40.0524%30 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0410%30 Sept →
nuke1–13-0.0214%29 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0112%29 Sept →
nuke13–90.025%28 Sept →
dust213–10-0.084%28 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0122%28 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0212%28 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0737%28 Sept →
cache8–130.0012%27 Sept →
dust213–100.049%25 Sept →
anubis13–70.005%25 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0516%25 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0814%25 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0218%24 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0710%24 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0817%24 Sept →
dust26–13-0.100%24 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.038%23 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0617%22 Sept →
dust219–160.0316%22 Sept →
anubis13–100.009%22 Sept →
anubis13–110.0115%22 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0330%21 Sept →
dust24–13-0.1013%21 Sept →
nuke16–14-0.086%20 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0625%20 Sept →
office7–13-0.0419%20 Sept →
cache1–13-0.054%20 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0111%20 Sept →
vertigo7–13-0.0623%20 Sept →
nuke13–100.0017%19 Sept →
inferno13–80.0613%19 Sept →
inferno0–13-0.0814%19 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.039%19 Sept →
cache13–90.0015%18 Sept →
dust213–10-0.067%18 Sept →
mirage13–60.0130%18 Sept →
nuke11–130.0014%17 Sept →
vertigo13–10-0.0313%17 Sept →
dust213–10.1120%17 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0310%17 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0510%16 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.126%16 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0614%16 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0413%15 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0113%15 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.077%14 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0813%14 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0613%14 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0323%14 Sept →
anubis9–130.052%14 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0711%13 Sept →
dust21–13-0.070%13 Sept →
anubis14–160.0217%12 Sept →
dust216–13-0.0311%12 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0021%12 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0612%12 Sept →
nuke13–30.0318%11 Sept →
mirage13–60.0316%10 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0112%10 Sept →
dust25–13-0.074%6 Sept →
cache13–10-0.057%6 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0523%6 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0311%2 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0723%2 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0715%1 Sept →
dust213–20.0412%1 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0818%1 Sept →
anubis1–13-0.0318%1 Sept →
overpass1–13-0.1144%1 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0614%31 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.0327%31 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0415%31 Aug →
dust213–30.0517%31 Aug →
nuke13–16-0.0426%29 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.037%29 Aug →
dust216–13-0.0511%28 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.058%27 Aug →
dust214–16-0.1011%27 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0119%27 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0317%27 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.077%26 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0311%26 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.056%26 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0232%25 Aug →
anubis13–80.0111%25 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0615%25 Aug →
anubis13–30.0422%25 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0721%24 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0115%24 Aug →
mirage13–50.029%20 Aug →
nuke16–130.0112%20 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0615%20 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0118%19 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.