bacon king

bacon king — CS2 Stats

GS76561198275643681[U:1:315377953]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

789Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
830Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating17,536Purple band · top ~18.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Jun 2026 (137 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,536 +7,126 17 Jan – 21 Jun · 19 days played
7,81818,664peak 18,66417 Jan21 Jun
18,664Peak Premier in tracked matches
42Days played since 2025-01-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,128 below peak (18,664)
  • -1,128 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,464 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate44.8%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy13.0%11.2%12.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.970.991.020.05 short
Match win rate46.6%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbacon kingFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER17,536 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning40
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–46–2Last 10052%Win rateWWWWWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −2.3pp headshot accuracy · −42ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Last 20

  • 15–5 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 644ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim5.7
Utility4.5
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.2
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 647ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning4.0
Utility4.5
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time642ms+20ms
first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 642ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–2 · ancient, 21 Mar →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · cache, 30 Apr →
375msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · office, 19 Dec →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 17 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W5Current streak
10–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2313–1057%-0.01
mirageB2211–1150%0.02
nukeA148–657%-0.01
dust2C146–843%0.00
infernoA85–363%0.03
overpassA74–357%0.01
anubisD62–433%-0.03
office—21–150%-0.03
train—20–20%0.02
cache—11–0100%-0.02
vertigo—11–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

34,607Lifetime kills
0.97K/D
2,126Matches
46.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
44.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
13.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
4,713MVPs
830Hours (in match)
1,858Bombs planted
521Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,155inferno
2,618dust2
1,453nuke
1,076vertigo
801train
282cbble
72office
16lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

90Matches
57%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
69.9ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis967%0.9513.3
Mirage888%1.3916.8
Ancient667%0.9614.5
Dust2425%0.8412.3
Nuke450%0.7511.0
Inferno250%0.748.5
Overpass1100%0.738.0
Vertigo10%1.1416.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
29.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.9%Spray accuracy
86.1%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
647msReaction time
27.8%T opening success
24.6%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
7.07HE damage / grenade
8.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4962 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.7574% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–6-0.0420%21 Jun →
cache13–5-0.0238%30 Apr →
dust213–8-0.0122%21 Mar →
inferno13–9-0.0412%21 Mar →
ancient13–20.1118%21 Mar →
anubis11–13-0.0510%21 Mar →
mirage3–13-0.0317%21 Mar →
dust29–110.0420%21 Mar →
inferno13–70.0922%14 Mar →
inferno3–130.0124%14 Mar →
mirage13–5-0.0310%14 Mar →
dust213–20.0426%14 Mar →
mirage10–13-0.0032%14 Mar →
ancient13–7-0.0827%14 Mar →
office10–0-0.0619%13 Mar →
mirage13–11-0.0324%12 Mar →
ancient13–110.0120%12 Mar →
nuke13–11-0.0315%12 Mar →
nuke13–9-0.0032%9 Mar →
ancient13–11-0.0520%9 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.1110%9 Mar →
ancient13–10-0.028%27 Feb →
mirage10–13-0.0019%27 Feb →
anubis13–7-0.1011%27 Feb →
ancient11–130.0021%27 Feb →
train2–130.0014%17 Jan →
inferno10–130.0423%17 Jan →
ancient9–13-0.0033%17 Jan →
dust213–16-0.0018%27 Dec →
nuke5–130.0325%23 Dec →
ancient10–130.0426%23 Dec →
overpass10–130.0222%23 Dec →
office8–130.0013%19 Dec →
vertigo13–8-0.0125%19 Dec →
ancient11–130.0119%14 Dec →
dust213–20.0621%14 Dec →
inferno9–50.0416%14 Dec →
ancient13–80.0131%13 Dec →
dust213–30.0625%13 Dec →
nuke16–14-0.0220%13 Dec →
mirage13–100.0731%12 Dec →
dust24–13-0.0510%6 Dec →
mirage13–20.0716%6 Dec →
overpass7–130.0021%8 Nov →
ancient13–90.0425%8 Nov →
overpass9–130.0122%26 Oct →
mirage4–130.0218%26 Oct →
overpass13–70.0215%26 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0816%24 Oct →
overpass16–140.0326%24 Oct →
nuke11–130.0426%24 Oct →
mirage13–80.0131%23 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0015%23 Oct →
overpass16–14-0.0017%21 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0225%18 Oct →
mirage13–80.0418%11 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0321%11 Oct →
mirage13–50.1019%11 Oct →
overpass13–10-0.0017%8 Oct →
ancient13–30.0321%8 Oct →
nuke4–12-0.030%10 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.0829%10 Jun →
nuke13–2-0.0127%8 Jun →
dust211–13-0.0018%24 May →
mirage13–80.0114%24 May →
mirage2–130.0114%24 May →
ancient8–13-0.0615%23 May →
anubis3–13-0.0711%17 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.0019%17 Apr →
ancient13–10.0237%17 Apr →
mirage9–13-0.0220%11 Apr →
nuke13–9-0.0120%9 Apr →
ancient7–13-0.0915%9 Apr →
anubis5–13-0.0619%9 Apr →
mirage13–50.0617%8 Apr →
nuke10–130.0322%8 Apr →
mirage13–50.0329%7 Apr →
inferno13–80.0026%7 Apr →
dust28–13-0.0422%7 Apr →
dust213–90.0225%6 Apr →
mirage11–130.0121%6 Apr →
inferno13–30.0918%6 Apr →
anubis13–50.0626%6 Apr →
nuke9–0-0.0010%6 Apr →
train6–130.0418%18 Mar →
ancient13–9-0.0415%18 Mar →
mirage5–13-0.0220%18 Mar →
ancient15–15-0.0027%17 Mar →
ancient13–11-0.0315%17 Mar →
nuke4–13-0.0533%14 Mar →
mirage13–60.0916%14 Mar →
ancient14–160.0523%11 Mar →
mirage15–150.0520%11 Mar →
ancient13–11-0.0218%7 Feb →
dust26–13-0.0230%7 Feb →
ancient13–11-0.0123%19 Jan →
nuke8–13-0.0712%19 Jan →
anubis11–130.0522%18 Jan →
dust213–90.0220%18 Jan →
mirage10–130.0827%17 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.