Tricario

Tricario — CS2 Stats

OM76561198271547239[U:1:311281511]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,519Tracked matches54%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,771Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,921Top 50% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#71686 of 261515 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,402 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,921 +5,509 15 Aug – 11 Nov · 34 days played
15,41220,921peak 20,92115 Aug11 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,402 +0 9 Sept – 15 Oct · 2 observations
1,4021,402peak 1,4029 Sept15 Oct
21,100Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,402Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2026-08-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,402
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 129 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-09
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-09

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 20,921
  • +1,895 over 30 days · improving
  • +5,509 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,079 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-09
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches45——
Win rate49%——
K/D0.87——
Headshot %42%——

Measured 15 Oct 2026 → 14 Nov 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate44.2%45.7%46.8%2.6% short
Shot accuracy3.2%12.7%13.0%9.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.901.051.060.16 short
Match win rate43.0%45.7%46.3%3.3% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 8 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTricarioFACEITLevel 7 · 1,402 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,921 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,402csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning56
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–44–2Last 10054%Win rateLWLWWLWWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · −0ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 20

  • 12–6–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility6.6
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 64% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 64% on T to 40% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning5.6
Utility6.6
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels5.5
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time579ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy16.4%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 16–14 · ancient, 15 Aug →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–8 · train, 9 Oct →
438msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 23 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 28 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
13–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 83% over 6mirageWeakest map · 44% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2414–1058%-0.02
mirageC188–1044%-0.02
infernoA159–660%-0.01
ancientS128–467%0.02
anubisB105–550%-0.01
cacheC94–544%-0.04
nukeS65–183%-0.00
train—30–30%0.01
vertigo—21–150%-0.04
office—10–10%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 18). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

44,692Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
2,770Matches
43.0%Match win rate
44.2%Headshot %
3.2%Shot accuracy
4,808MVPs
1,107Hours (in match)
2,075Bombs planted
575Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,021dust2
3,624inferno
2,402nuke
1,265vertigo
436office
381train
13cbble
4italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

204Matches
54%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
79.1ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust25062%1.2214.8
Mirage3749%1.0515.9
Ancient3459%1.2616.0
Nuke2540%0.9314.2
Inferno2454%1.1417.2
Cache1638%0.9013.8
Anubis1050%1.0615.2
Overpass4100%0.8913.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
75.0%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
590msReaction time
63.7%T opening success
40.5%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
9.89HE damage / grenade
10.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–130.0123%11 Nov →
anubis16–14-0.0912%11 Nov →
mirage5–13-0.1018%11 Nov →
mirage13–110.0019%8 Nov →
mirage13–100.0421%8 Nov →
mirage3–13-0.0710%8 Nov →
nuke13–80.0320%8 Nov →
dust213–90.0218%7 Nov →
mirage15–15-0.0212%7 Nov →
dust213–11-0.0515%7 Nov →
inferno13–10-0.0413%7 Nov →
cache11–13-0.0514%7 Nov →
dust213–80.0618%6 Nov →
train6–130.017%4 Nov →
office12–120.0533%1 Nov →
ancient13–30.0318%31 Oct →
dust213–20.0711%28 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0310%28 Oct →
nuke13–110.0123%25 Oct →
inferno13–2-0.0718%25 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0411%25 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0416%24 Oct →
inferno11–130.0214%24 Oct →
anubis10–130.0215%24 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0513%24 Oct →
anubis13–30.0819%23 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0117%20 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0413%20 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0313%20 Oct →
ancient13–80.0512%19 Oct →
inferno13–110.0132%19 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0116%19 Oct →
nuke13–80.0418%17 Oct →
mirage13–30.1118%17 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.108%17 Oct →
mirage9–130.0413%16 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0417%16 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0224%14 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.029%14 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0627%14 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0710%14 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0515%14 Oct →
dust213–2-0.0614%13 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0018%13 Oct →
dust213–30.0335%13 Oct →
ancient13–100.0916%11 Oct →
mirage19–160.0412%11 Oct →
inferno13–60.0420%10 Oct →
train4–130.0330%10 Oct →
inferno6–90.1213%10 Oct →
cache13–3-0.0124%10 Oct →
ancient13–80.0817%9 Oct →
dust213–70.0218%9 Oct →
train2–80.0150%9 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0519%7 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0012%7 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0421%5 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0728%30 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0314%30 Sept →
cache13–16-0.029%25 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.048%25 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0116%23 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0121%23 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0418%22 Sept →
dust213–3-0.0525%22 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.048%22 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0316%19 Sept →
cache16–14-0.0419%18 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0010%18 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0124%16 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0328%16 Sept →
ancient13–3-0.0112%13 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0417%13 Sept →
inferno13–60.0313%13 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0611%11 Sept →
anubis13–60.0327%11 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0124%10 Sept →
mirage9–130.0421%10 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0616%9 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0824%9 Sept →
vertigo7–13-0.0217%7 Sept →
inferno13–110.0419%7 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0216%7 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0217%4 Sept →
anubis11–130.0121%2 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.0613%2 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0317%2 Sept →
vertigo13–8-0.0513%1 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0816%31 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0915%31 Aug →
cache13–2-0.0129%31 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0016%23 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0511%23 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0410%22 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.038%22 Aug →
dust213–90.0321%21 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0310%21 Aug →
cache9–13-0.029%15 Aug →
ancient16–140.1425%15 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0723%15 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.