𝔸𝔻𝕀 ツ — CS2 Stats

DE76561198271391449[U:1:311125721]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,875Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

1,326Hours in CS

CSDB Rating6.9 SolidSupport

Premier CS Rating25,748Top 10% of 201,122 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#14207 of 247944 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,804 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,748 +2,806 13 Jul – 14 Sept · 41 days played

Faceit ELO: 1,804 +0 28 Aug – 12 Sept · 5 observations

26,637Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,804Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

41Days played since 2026-07-13

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,804
Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 197 to go
Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

699 below peak (26,447)
-36 over 30 days · steady
Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,252 to go
Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
Red band first seen 2026-08-28
Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

Metric	Last 30	Previous 30	Change
Matches	10	—	—
Win rate	40%	—	—
K/D	0.94	—	—
Headshot %	63%	—	—

Measured 2 Sep 2026 → 2 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,762), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 8 median	Level 9 median	vs Level 9
Headshot rate	47.9%	46.8%	48.2%	meets
Shot accuracy	9.7%	13.0%	13.3%	3.6% short
Kill/death ratio	0.95	1.06	1.07	0.12 short
Match win rate	46.2%	46.3%	46.9%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85

Positioning63

Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–45–3Last 10052%Win rateLWWLWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +1.5pp headshot accuracy · +2ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 23%
Avg reaction 583ms

Last 10

4–6 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 23%
Avg reaction 526ms

Last 20

10–10 · 50% win rate
Avg rating 0.00
Avg headshot accuracy 22%
Avg reaction 525ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.5

Utility6.8

Positioning6.3

Opening Duels4.3

Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5

Positioning6.3

Utility6.8

Mechanics6.0

Opening Duels3.8

Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time516ms−39ms

first ⅓ avg 554ms → last ⅓ avg 516ms

Headshot accuracy20.4%+1.7%

first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 9–4 · inferno, 12 Aug →

37%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · anubis, 1 Sept →

344msFastest reaction time · 7–0 · cache, 13 Sept →

13–0Biggest win · cache, 24 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak

9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 60% over 10dust2Weakest map · 40% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	26	15–11	58%	-0.00
inferno	B	24	11–13	46%	0.02
ancient	B	22	11–11	50%	0.03
cache	A	11	6–5	55%	0.00
anubis	A	10	6–4	60%	0.01
dust2	C	5	2–3	40%	0.01
nuke	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

59,970Lifetime kills

0.95K/D

3,608Matches

46.2%Match win rate

47.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players

9.7%Shot accuracy

10,780MVPs

1,326Hours (in match)

2,239Bombs planted

620Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4719,430

M4A4 / M4A1-S7,793

Desert Eagle5,945

AWP5,641

P2000 / USP-S4,144

Glock-183,095

MP91,770

SSG 081,361

MP71,319

MAC-101,285

Lifetime map wins

6,241inferno

2,717dust2

1,839cbble

1,715nuke

861vertigo

300train

160office

23lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

299Matches

54%Win rate

1.10Avg K/D

87.4ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	75	64%	1.24	17.9
Ancient	32	59%	1.04	16.9
Dust2	31	42%	0.91	15.6
Inferno	25	60%	1.17	15.1
Anubis	20	50%	1.25	19.1
Nuke	10	60%	1.14	15.7
Overpass	6	33%	1.16	23.5
Train	3	33%	1.18	23.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy

36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

46.2%Spray accuracy

77.1%Counter-strafing

8.8°Preaim

522msReaction time

34.4%T opening success

56.4%CT opening success

0.60Enemies flashed / flash

11.1%Flash assists

11.83HE damage / grenade

13.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.4236% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	8–13	-0.01	32%	14 Sept →
mirage	13–10	0.01	24%	14 Sept →
inferno	13–6	-0.03	24%	14 Sept →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	19%	13 Sept →
nuke	13–9	0.02	20%	13 Sept →
inferno	5–13	0.04	25%	13 Sept →
cache	7–0	0.05	22%	13 Sept →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	28%	13 Sept →
ancient	10–13	0.04	24%	7 Sept →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	13%	3 Sept →
inferno	4–13	-0.05	23%	1 Sept →
anubis	5–13	-0.02	37%	1 Sept →
mirage	13–7	0.02	31%	1 Sept →
mirage	13–11	0.02	17%	31 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.04	9%	31 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.05	22%	29 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	19%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.02	10%	27 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.04	20%	27 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	26%	24 Aug →
inferno	8–8	0.05	16%	24 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.03	23%	23 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.04	29%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.01	22%	22 Aug →
anubis	16–14	-0.01	9%	21 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	9%	21 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.04	18%	21 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.06	17%	21 Aug →
anubis	16–13	0.04	14%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	16%	17 Aug →
inferno	16–13	0.05	18%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.04	16%	16 Aug →
ancient	14–16	0.06	23%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.11	12%	16 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	17%	16 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	12%	16 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.05	19%	16 Aug →
inferno	9–6	0.13	26%	15 Aug →
inferno	3–9	-0.02	19%	15 Aug →
inferno	7–9	0.13	19%	15 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.09	15%	14 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.03	20%	13 Aug →
inferno	4–9	0.05	26%	12 Aug →
inferno	9–4	0.15	26%	12 Aug →
inferno	9–1	0.14	21%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	29%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	21%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.04	30%	7 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.11	14%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.03	22%	6 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.04	15%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.03	10%	5 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.04	14%	4 Aug →
ancient	16–14	-0.01	18%	4 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.06	17%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.09	30%	4 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	16%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.02	14%	3 Aug →
mirage	16–12	0.01	20%	2 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.04	17%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	22%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.01	20%	1 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.08	23%	31 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.09	6%	31 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	15%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.09	26%	31 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.03	20%	30 Jul →
cache	13–16	-0.07	36%	24 Jul →
cache	13–0	0.10	28%	24 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.03	12%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.07	20%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.07	24%	24 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.03	27%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.03	30%	24 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	26%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.02	17%	23 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.03	23%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.07	22%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–16	-0.01	16%	22 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.05	16%	22 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	10%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.04	27%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.11	13%	21 Jul →
inferno	16–13	0.04	24%	21 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.01	17%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	20%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.04	4%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.03	13%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.00	19%	18 Jul →
inferno	9–5	0.01	9%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–16	-0.02	20%	16 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.02	21%	16 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.06	11%	15 Jul →
ancient	15–15	0.03	9%	15 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.02	15%	15 Jul →
mirage	16–12	0.07	11%	14 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.07	19%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.06	24%	13 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.03	17%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.02	17%	13 Jul →