eumel

eumel — CS2 Stats

VA76561197965521030[U:1:5255302]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,090Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating14,383Blue band · top ~31.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,139 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,383 -4,609 3 Sept – 31 Oct · 29 days played
14,00418,992peak 18,9923 Sept31 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,139 +0 3 Sept – 10 Sept · 3 observations
1,1391,139peak 1,1393 Sept10 Sept
18,992Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,139Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-09-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,139
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 62 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,609 below peak (18,992)
  • -2,620 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 617 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGeumelFACEITLevel 4 · 1,139 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER14,383 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,139csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning37
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40–57–3Last 10040%Win rateWLWLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −1.8pp headshot accuracy · −46ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility5.1
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning3.7
Utility5.1
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time578ms+34ms
first ⅓ avg 544ms → last ⅓ avg 578ms
Headshot accuracy12.3%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 13.8% → last ⅓ avg 12.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–1 · ancient, 15 Sept →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · dust2, 17 Sept →
344msFastest reaction time · 1–6 · inferno, 30 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 11 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
5–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 55% over 22anubisWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2212–1055%0.00
mirageD186–1233%-0.01
dust2D175–1229%-0.02
ancientB105–550%0.01
cacheC104–640%-0.04
anubisD92–722%-0.02
nukeC73–443%-0.01
vertigo—32–167%-0.02
train—21–150%-0.01
fachwerk—10–10%0.04
overpass—10–10%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

158Matches
53%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
66.7ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22843%0.8512.7
Mirage2552%0.9011.7
Ancient2259%0.9011.8
Inferno2259%1.0814.4
Vertigo2065%1.1015.4
Anubis1850%0.9913.4
Nuke978%1.0413.7
Overpass540%0.8813.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.3%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.9%Spray accuracy
78.2%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
580msReaction time
39.3%T opening success
29.2%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
10.1%Flash assists
7.89HE damage / grenade
8.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.2724% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.3155% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–10-0.0114%31 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0215%31 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0214%31 Oct →
inferno9–130.026%31 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0811%30 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.018%28 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0917%27 Oct →
inferno13–70.097%27 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0110%27 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0211%26 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0616%26 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0019%25 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0614%25 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.077%23 Oct →
mirage13–100.016%22 Oct →
inferno13–30.0316%22 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.048%19 Oct →
inferno13–3-0.0217%17 Oct →
nuke13–90.0411%16 Oct →
inferno13–20.0516%16 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0924%16 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0217%16 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0710%16 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0215%16 Oct →
dust213–90.0114%15 Oct →
anubis1–13-0.042%15 Oct →
train13–5-0.019%13 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0112%13 Oct →
train9–13-0.0114%13 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.027%11 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.079%11 Oct →
mirage13–00.028%11 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0421%10 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.035%10 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.049%10 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.009%10 Oct →
vertigo13–8-0.036%10 Oct →
fachwerk8–130.0417%10 Oct →
ancient11–130.0113%10 Oct →
inferno16–130.009%10 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0224%10 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0612%9 Oct →
ancient13–20.029%9 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.017%7 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0511%6 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.089%6 Oct →
mirage0–13-0.0211%6 Oct →
dust213–7-0.064%6 Oct →
cache0–13-0.0319%3 Oct →
dust22–13-0.025%3 Oct →
inferno2–130.059%3 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0410%3 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0415%3 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0614%3 Oct →
inferno16–14-0.0313%2 Oct →
inferno13–30.034%2 Oct →
cache13–60.0411%2 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0711%2 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0522%2 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0513%2 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.033%2 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.024%2 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0923%2 Oct →
inferno1–60.0621%30 Sept →
vertigo13–50.086%29 Sept →
vertigo5–13-0.1112%29 Sept →
inferno13–80.0311%28 Sept →
ancient15–150.0215%28 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0210%28 Sept →
overpass4–130.0711%28 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0310%28 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0610%28 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0013%27 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.057%27 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0919%27 Sept →
anubis14–160.0218%27 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0213%27 Sept →
dust28–13-0.037%27 Sept →
dust213–60.0513%27 Sept →
cache12–12-0.0111%25 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0212%23 Sept →
cache13–11-0.046%23 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0211%23 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0417%23 Sept →
anubis13–40.0219%20 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.086%20 Sept →
dust213–40.0114%20 Sept →
ancient13–60.1113%20 Sept →
inferno11–30.057%19 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.039%18 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0222%18 Sept →
dust211–130.0938%17 Sept →
mirage13–70.1516%17 Sept →
mirage8–130.1218%16 Sept →
nuke5–130.0819%16 Sept →
inferno13–110.1618%15 Sept →
ancient13–10.1623%15 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.043%11 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0515%11 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0411%11 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.