Dimmea

Dimmea — CS2 Stats

76561198271163948[U:1:310898220]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,619Tracked matches60%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,046Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,612 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (72 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,612 → 1,612
+194Tracked matches · now 1,619
+13.3ppWin rate · 46.7% → 60.0%

Rating over time

1,612Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-08-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,612
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 139 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate33.0%48.2%50.9%18.0% short
Shot accuracy2.6%13.2%13.7%11.1% short
Kill/death ratio0.991.071.090.10 short
Match win rate49.5%46.9%48.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDimmeaFACEITLevel 9 · 1,612 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,612csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning73
Utility80

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–51Last 10049%Win rateLWLWWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +1.6pp headshot accuracy · +62ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim5.5
Utility8.0
Positioning7.3
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 60% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 80 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning7.3
Utility8.0
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time587ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 583ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms
Headshot accuracy12.9%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 11.6% → last ⅓ avg 12.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–4 · anubis, 11 Oct →
29%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · cache, 15 Oct →
406msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · anubis, 28 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 14 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
14–15In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 62% over 29nukeWeakest map · 35% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB3016–1453%0.00
anubisA2918–1162%0.01
nukeC207–1335%0.00
cacheC177–1041%-0.00
ancient—41–325%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

39,369Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
2,320Matches
49.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
33.0%Headshot %
2.6%Shot accuracy
5,412MVPs
1,046Hours (in match)
3,584Bombs planted
512Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4712,416
AWP4,649
P2501,715
Knife1,148

Lifetime map wins

6,146inferno
2,465nuke
1,164vertigo
367cbble
281dust2
276train
37office
28italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,434Matches
52%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
81.5ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis42357%1.0716.2
Inferno41151%1.0615.7
Nuke16556%1.0015.0
Ancient14547%0.9814.7
Overpass11955%1.1215.8
Cache8032%0.9916.6
Vertigo5353%1.1116.0
Mirage2941%0.9715.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.4%Headshot accuracy
32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.6%Spray accuracy
80.2%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
587msReaction time
44.6%T opening success
56.9%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
12.4%Flash assists
12.29HE damage / grenade
16.58Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.4093% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–160.0115%11 Nov →
inferno13–70.0417%11 Nov →
inferno11–130.0216%11 Nov →
nuke13–8-0.0210%10 Nov →
inferno13–110.0015%10 Nov →
anubis16–140.0310%9 Nov →
nuke7–13-0.0217%9 Nov →
ancient8–13-0.0817%9 Nov →
nuke19–170.0614%5 Nov →
inferno13–100.0314%5 Nov →
anubis13–100.0215%5 Nov →
cache8–13-0.0014%1 Nov →
inferno7–13-0.0814%1 Nov →
anubis13–100.0415%1 Nov →
inferno11–13-0.0216%1 Nov →
anubis8–13-0.038%1 Nov →
inferno13–160.0011%30 Oct →
ancient13–110.0410%30 Oct →
anubis13–100.0216%30 Oct →
inferno13–90.048%30 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.018%30 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0126%28 Oct →
inferno13–110.0513%27 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.029%25 Oct →
cache13–110.0111%25 Oct →
inferno19–15-0.0118%21 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0316%18 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.055%18 Oct →
inferno13–60.0113%18 Oct →
inferno13–90.027%18 Oct →
nuke13–40.0521%18 Oct →
cache7–130.037%17 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.060%17 Oct →
inferno17–19-0.0516%17 Oct →
nuke16–140.0010%17 Oct →
cache13–110.0329%15 Oct →
anubis13–60.047%15 Oct →
cache14–160.0517%15 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0312%15 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0621%14 Oct →
inferno13–40.0514%14 Oct →
anubis13–10.0410%14 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0315%14 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.029%13 Oct →
inferno16–14-0.0315%13 Oct →
anubis13–70.0215%13 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.014%12 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.053%12 Oct →
nuke13–100.0215%12 Oct →
anubis13–30.0615%11 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.006%11 Oct →
cache13–30.0815%11 Oct →
anubis13–40.099%11 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0315%11 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.038%11 Oct →
nuke9–130.0014%11 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.055%10 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.044%10 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0112%10 Oct →
cache11–13-0.048%10 Oct →
inferno13–70.0410%10 Oct →
anubis13–110.025%10 Oct →
anubis13–30.0111%10 Oct →
inferno13–110.0313%8 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0017%6 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0323%1 Oct →
anubis13–60.0710%1 Oct →
anubis13–90.0511%30 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.028%28 Sept →
anubis6–130.0411%28 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0615%21 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0320%21 Sept →
nuke11–130.0412%20 Sept →
anubis9–130.018%20 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0313%20 Sept →
anubis14–160.0217%19 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.046%19 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.038%19 Sept →
nuke6–130.0115%13 Sept →
cache4–130.0213%13 Sept →
cache2–13-0.086%10 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.035%8 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.037%7 Sept →
anubis11–130.018%7 Sept →
inferno25–220.0410%6 Sept →
cache11–13-0.049%6 Sept →
nuke5–130.019%6 Sept →
nuke13–50.0017%5 Sept →
cache19–160.0511%5 Sept →
inferno13–100.0016%5 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0114%5 Sept →
inferno13–100.0710%5 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0013%1 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.093%30 Aug →
anubis13–110.0215%30 Aug →
nuke10–130.0112%30 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0211%30 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0011%30 Aug →
nuke8–130.0126%26 Aug →
nuke6–130.0516%25 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.