SanadaKozo

SanadaKozo — CS2 Stats

76561198267146398[U:1:306880670]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,065Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since
694Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating16,070Purple band · top ~24.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Aug 2026 (55 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

16,070Peak Premier in tracked matches
23Days played since 2026-07-17

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 16,070
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,930 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

No matches recorded between 10 Sep 2026 and 10 Oct 2026.

Measured 10 Sep 2026 → 10 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,649), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate40.0%43.7%44.8%4.8% short
Shot accuracy1.1%12.0%12.4%11.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.831.021.030.20 short
Match win rate44.6%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSanadaKozoFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER16,070 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning32
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–49–3Last 10048%Win rateWLLWWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −2.8pp headshot accuracy · +23ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility3.7
Positioning3.2
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning3.2
Utility3.7
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact5.6

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time577ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 584ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%+5.5%
first ⅓ avg 11.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 3–9 · poseidon, 5 Aug →
31%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · inferno, 11 Aug →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · anubis, 30 Jul →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 14 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 73% over 11dust2Weakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA2314–961%-0.01
mirageC228–1436%-0.04
nukeA138–562%0.01
ancientS118–373%-0.00
dust2D91–811%-0.05
officeS64–267%0.00
cacheS64–267%-0.05
infernoD61–517%-0.07
vertigo—30–30%-0.03
poseidon—10–10%0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

24,702Lifetime kills
0.83K/D
1,758Matches
44.6%Match win rate
40.0%Headshot %
1.1%Shot accuracy
3,354MVPs
694Hours (in match)
611Bombs planted
258Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,515nuke
1,657office
1,333inferno
756dust2
648vertigo
289train
12cbble
4italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

149Matches
50%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
81.7ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4943%0.8713.7
Anubis4466%1.0816.7
Nuke2250%1.0117.1
Ancient1656%0.8813.9
Dust21225%0.7911.8
Cache367%0.8014.3
Inferno30%0.519.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
71.4%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
568msReaction time
23.1%T opening success
35.4%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
7.95HE damage / grenade
5.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4054 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.0693% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office13–5-0.0214%17 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0316%17 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0422%17 Aug →
anubis13–60.0627%17 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.068%17 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.058%17 Aug →
anubis25–28-0.0214%17 Aug →
dust27–13-0.073%17 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0414%16 Aug →
dust213–70.0220%16 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0216%16 Aug →
nuke13–4-0.0515%16 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0119%16 Aug →
nuke13–60.0616%14 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.084%14 Aug →
ancient13–10.0520%14 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0525%14 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0418%14 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0714%14 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0227%13 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0214%13 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0831%11 Aug →
ancient7–10.0216%11 Aug →
dust27–13-0.1021%11 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0621%10 Aug →
anubis13–60.0414%9 Aug →
anubis17–19-0.0418%9 Aug →
cache16–12-0.0816%9 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0821%5 Aug →
poseidon3–90.1214%5 Aug →
inferno2–9-0.1821%5 Aug →
inferno9–6-0.0427%5 Aug →
mirage12–12-0.028%4 Aug →
office13–3-0.0025%1 Aug →
office3–13-0.007%1 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0514%30 Jul →
anubis13–10-0.0718%30 Jul →
cache0–10-0.0427%30 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.069%30 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0619%30 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0611%29 Jul →
anubis13–80.0513%29 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.089%29 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.114%29 Jul →
vertigo9–130.0116%29 Jul →
vertigo6–13-0.0612%29 Jul →
vertigo11–13-0.0330%29 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0313%28 Jul →
mirage13–50.0119%28 Jul →
anubis13–7-0.0214%28 Jul →
nuke13–6-0.0615%28 Jul →
anubis13–6-0.0214%28 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0417%28 Jul →
ancient13–90.0013%28 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0512%28 Jul →
anubis12–120.0212%28 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0422%28 Jul →
office13–50.0623%28 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0215%27 Jul →
anubis13–7-0.028%27 Jul →
cache12–12-0.0812%27 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0413%27 Jul →
ancient8–130.0010%27 Jul →
office6–13-0.0613%27 Jul →
office13–60.0320%27 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0512%25 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0413%25 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0323%24 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0116%24 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0912%24 Jul →
mirage8–130.0312%23 Jul →
inferno8–130.0611%23 Jul →
nuke6–130.025%22 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.044%22 Jul →
anubis13–20.0312%22 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0219%21 Jul →
anubis7–130.0012%21 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.074%21 Jul →
nuke13–30.119%21 Jul →
nuke10–130.0112%21 Jul →
mirage13–4-0.0321%20 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0718%20 Jul →
ancient16–130.0510%20 Jul →
cache13–60.0410%20 Jul →
anubis13–9-0.012%20 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0416%20 Jul →
anubis13–110.008%20 Jul →
anubis13–50.0610%20 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0612%20 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.100%20 Jul →
nuke16–130.0414%20 Jul →
ancient13–110.0515%19 Jul →
nuke10–130.037%19 Jul →
anubis13–9-0.0110%18 Jul →
dust25–13-0.0721%18 Jul →
nuke16–14-0.0311%17 Jul →
anubis13–5-0.046%17 Jul →
nuke13–40.1016%17 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.0120%17 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.052%17 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.