Schreck der Scheideck

Schreck der Scheideck — CS2 Stats

VG76561198259066650[U:1:298800922]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

211Tracked matches23%Win rate2020Tracked since
701Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating2.0 LearningSupport
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim18
Positioning24
Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD31–55–14Last 10031%Win rateWLLLWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +3.3pp headshot accuracy · −60ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 652ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 701ms

Last 20

  • 6–14 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 731ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim1.8
Utility3.1
Positioning2.4
Opening Duels0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 69% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 26% on CT to 3% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 698ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim1.8
Positioning2.4
Utility3.1
Mechanics3.5
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact0.0

Composite 2.0/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.09−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.06 → last ⅓ avg -0.09
Reaction time715ms+14ms
first ⅓ avg 700ms → last ⅓ avg 715ms
Headshot accuracy10.3%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 7.7% → last ⅓ avg 10.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 9–3 · vertigo, 16 Feb →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 16–6 · mirage, 8 Feb →
406msFastest reaction time · 1–9 · cache, 9 Feb →
13–3Biggest win · office, 24 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

2Longest win streak
7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 43% over 7cacheWeakest map · 17% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD4515–3033%-0.08
vertigoD174–1324%-0.05
cacheD122–1017%-0.07
officeC73–443%-0.07
dust2C73–443%-0.08
ancientD61–517%-0.09
nuke—22–0100%-0.04
overpass—20–20%-0.04
agency—10–10%-0.10
tuscan—11–0100%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

18,960Lifetime kills
0.80K/D
1,422Matches
34.5%Match win rate
33.0%Headshot %
17.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
2,773MVPs
356Hours (in match)
504Bombs planted
199Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

728vertigo
415inferno
405dust2
232office
220lake
181train
151nuke
132cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.8%Headshot accuracy
24.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.3%Spray accuracy
65.9%Counter-strafing
12.6°Preaim
698msReaction time
2.7%T opening success
26.4%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
7.4%Flash assists
1.25HE damage / grenade
1.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.5987° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.8453% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4186 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office13–3-0.0119%24 Mar →
vertigo7–13-0.096%24 Mar →
office6–13-0.0419%12 Mar →
mirage2–13-0.0933%12 Mar →
office7–3-0.0820%23 Feb →
ancient6–9-0.1120%2 May →
ancient3–9-0.0512%26 Apr →
cache3–9-0.1110%26 Apr →
agency5–9-0.1014%23 Apr →
mirage9–3-0.090%23 Apr →
office9–5-0.110%23 Apr →
cache4–9-0.116%20 Apr →
nuke9–7-0.070%17 Apr →
overpass2–9-0.0820%17 Apr →
mirage5–9-0.0920%17 Apr →
mirage7–9-0.1413%16 Apr →
vertigo4–9-0.1017%16 Apr →
mirage9–7-0.050%23 Mar →
mirage5–9-0.0711%12 Mar →
overpass3–9-0.0133%12 Mar →
cache1–9-0.080%7 Mar →
mirage6–9-0.100%7 Mar →
mirage7–9-0.120%7 Mar →
mirage9–5-0.0020%6 Mar →
office6–9-0.0617%5 Mar →
office0–9-0.160%5 Mar →
mirage7–9-0.150%5 Mar →
mirage6–9-0.140%2 Mar →
mirage4–9-0.135%1 Mar →
mirage5–9-0.0913%26 Feb →
tuscan9–5-0.060%26 Feb →
mirage6–9-0.110%26 Feb →
mirage1–9-0.1314%21 Feb →
cache9–60.0010%21 Feb →
vertigo4–9-0.060%21 Feb →
dust21–9-0.0538%20 Feb →
vertigo9–6-0.0615%20 Feb →
ancient9–5-0.060%20 Feb →
mirage1–9-0.1122%19 Feb →
cache0–9-0.100%19 Feb →
vertigo9–30.077%16 Feb →
vertigo9–20.043%16 Feb →
mirage5–9-0.044%16 Feb →
dust29–7-0.040%15 Feb →
office0–9-0.070%15 Feb →
vertigo8–8-0.0116%13 Feb →
mirage9–6-0.019%13 Feb →
cache1–9-0.097%9 Feb →
vertigo7–9-0.130%8 Feb →
mirage16–6-0.08100%8 Feb →
dust28–8-0.0625%7 Feb →
mirage9–6-0.0033%7 Feb →
mirage8–8-0.090%6 Feb →
vertigo4–9-0.1225%6 Feb →
ancient1–9-0.120%6 Feb →
mirage6–9-0.040%6 Feb →
cache8–8-0.0914%4 Feb →
mirage9–7-0.0721%4 Feb →
ancient6–9-0.145%4 Feb →
mirage9–7-0.0424%4 Feb →
cache2–9-0.0820%2 Feb →
dust29–5-0.097%2 Feb →
vertigo9–0-0.0213%2 Feb →
mirage2–9-0.130%1 Feb →
mirage6–9-0.0417%1 Feb →
ancient8–8-0.0815%1 Feb →
dust25–9-0.1314%1 Feb →
mirage8–8-0.0927%29 Jan →
mirage3–9-0.120%29 Jan →
mirage7–9-0.090%26 Jan →
nuke9–70.0010%25 Jan →
mirage8–8-0.0614%25 Jan →
mirage9–4-0.029%25 Jan →
vertigo8–8-0.090%24 Jan →
cache8–8-0.0513%24 Jan →
mirage6–9-0.070%24 Jan →
dust23–9-0.100%23 Jan →
mirage6–9-0.098%23 Jan →
cache4–9-0.059%21 Jan →
mirage9–5-0.0613%21 Jan →
mirage9–6-0.1121%21 Jan →
mirage8–8-0.1117%19 Jan →
vertigo8–8-0.030%19 Jan →
mirage9–6-0.0924%18 Jan →
mirage8–8-0.0633%18 Jan →
vertigo8–8-0.019%17 Jan →
mirage9–5-0.070%17 Jan →
vertigo5–9-0.047%16 Jan →
dust29–7-0.080%16 Jan →
vertigo5–9-0.1011%12 Jan →
cache3–9-0.055%12 Jan →
mirage7–9-0.035%11 Jan →
mirage9–2-0.039%11 Jan →
mirage8–8-0.097%10 Jan →
mirage9–1-0.040%10 Jan →
vertigo3–9-0.090%10 Jan →
cache9–50.010%9 Jan →
vertigo5–9-0.066%9 Jan →
mirage5–9-0.090%9 Jan →
mirage6–9-0.090%8 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.