MΛYПD

MΛYПD — CS2 Stats

NU76561198257553837[U:1:297288109]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,069Tracked matches45%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,882Hours in CS79Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,811Top 50% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#72074 of 259149 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,356 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,811 +408 25 Oct – 31 Oct · 5 days played
20,28720,912peak 20,91225 Oct31 Oct
20,912Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,804Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-08-18

Faceit ELO

  • 448 below peak (1,804)
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 175 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6

Premier CS Rating

  • 101 below peak (20,912)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,189 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate51.8%48.2%50.9%meets
Shot accuracy7.2%13.2%13.7%6.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.191.071.09above
Match win rate47.5%46.9%48.4%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMΛYПDFACEITLevel 9 · 1,356 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER20,811 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,804csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning66
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–45–8Last 10047%Win rateLLWLWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −4.6pp headshot accuracy · −18ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility5.4
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 57% on T to 32% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning6.6
Utility5.4
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time571ms+3ms
first ⅓ avg 568ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy22.9%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 9–1 · nuke, 17 Oct →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 9–2 · poseidon, 14 Sept →
359msFastest reaction time · 2–2 · vertigo, 24 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 15 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
13–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 11infernoWeakest map · 35% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC207–1335%0.02
ancientC188–1044%0.02
mirageC135–838%0.01
nukeS118–373%0.08
anubisA106–460%-0.00
dust2B84–450%-0.01
cacheB84–450%0.03
vertigoA53–260%0.02
debris—30–30%-0.09
poseidon—21–150%0.08
train—10–10%0.02
overpass—11–0100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

43,622Lifetime kills
1.19K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
2,322Matches
47.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
51.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
7.2%Shot accuracy
5,997MVPs
906Hours (in match)
1,708Bombs planted
625Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

7,945dust2
2,888inferno
1,247nuke
359train
196vertigo
87office
64italy
17cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

385Matches
52%Win rate
1.32Avg K/D
83.8ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust27148%1.3017.4
Mirage6752%1.3318.1
Ancient6648%1.3219.2
Anubis6552%1.4316.6
Inferno5652%1.2818.5
Nuke2556%1.3117.1
Overpass2370%1.2719.2
Cache1242%1.1515.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy
39.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.8%Spray accuracy
85.4%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
586msReaction time
56.6%T opening success
32.5%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
6.25HE damage / grenade
5.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 32.4755% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–13-0.0432%31 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0415%31 Oct →
nuke13–80.0636%30 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0716%30 Oct →
inferno13–110.0216%28 Oct →
ancient4–130.0227%28 Oct →
inferno16–140.0518%28 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0318%27 Oct →
dust22–130.0419%27 Oct →
mirage13–60.0315%27 Oct →
inferno7–130.0633%26 Oct →
mirage12–160.0222%25 Oct →
anubis13–110.0020%25 Oct →
cache13–110.1424%24 Oct →
vertigo2–2-0.0130%24 Oct →
ancient13–40.1323%24 Oct →
train12–120.0227%22 Oct →
cache13–70.0527%22 Oct →
inferno0–9-0.3030%22 Oct →
ancient8–130.0722%21 Oct →
cache13–110.1731%21 Oct →
nuke9–30.1617%20 Oct →
inferno8–80.2124%20 Oct →
inferno9–60.1324%20 Oct →
debris2–9-0.1221%18 Oct →
inferno9–50.1322%18 Oct →
mirage13–110.0318%18 Oct →
poseidon8–80.1422%17 Oct →
inferno8–80.0718%17 Oct →
nuke8–80.1420%17 Oct →
nuke9–10.2927%17 Oct →
inferno11–130.0327%17 Oct →
inferno7–9-0.0416%16 Oct →
nuke2–9-0.0718%16 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0317%16 Oct →
nuke6–130.0923%14 Oct →
vertigo13–100.1321%14 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0318%10 Oct →
dust213–110.0219%26 Sept →
inferno7–130.0316%26 Sept →
ancient4–130.0119%23 Sept →
inferno9–30.1347%16 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0023%15 Sept →
anubis13–2-0.0312%15 Sept →
ancient13–110.1019%15 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0041%15 Sept →
dust20–7-0.0829%15 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.1118%15 Sept →
inferno9–6-0.1018%15 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0417%14 Sept →
poseidon9–20.0250%14 Sept →
debris5–9-0.0714%14 Sept →
overpass9–7-0.0218%14 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0419%14 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0730%14 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0626%13 Sept →
vertigo7–90.0126%13 Sept →
vertigo9–10.0820%13 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0136%12 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0517%12 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.1020%11 Sept →
anubis13–80.1116%11 Sept →
anubis13–110.1224%11 Sept →
ancient13–70.0324%10 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0027%9 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0219%6 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0610%6 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0340%6 Sept →
mirage13–70.0218%6 Sept →
vertigo6–9-0.1325%5 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0117%1 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0414%1 Sept →
mirage8–130.0321%31 Aug →
ancient7–130.0123%30 Aug →
nuke13–50.1127%30 Aug →
nuke13–50.0617%30 Aug →
anubis13–110.0015%30 Aug →
nuke13–50.0715%28 Aug →
ancient16–140.0819%28 Aug →
inferno5–9-0.0319%28 Aug →
debris8–8-0.0819%26 Aug →
inferno9–20.1328%26 Aug →
inferno9–130.0720%26 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0323%25 Aug →
mirage13–70.1432%25 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.079%25 Aug →
dust213–80.0035%25 Aug →
cache6–13-0.1023%23 Aug →
ancient12–120.017%23 Aug →
ancient12–120.009%23 Aug →
cache13–60.0215%23 Aug →
mirage10–130.0625%23 Aug →
ancient13–30.0626%23 Aug →
nuke13–50.0423%22 Aug →
ancient13–80.0215%20 Aug →
ancient13–40.0123%20 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0039%20 Aug →
dust213–100.0130%20 Aug →
anubis13–4-0.0330%19 Aug →
inferno7–130.1026%18 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.