Caillou_Der_Sternenzerstörer

Caillou_Der_Sternenzerstörer — CS2 Stats

76561199198449198[U:1:1238183470]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

541Tracked matches55%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating3,086Grey band · top ~86.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 3,086 -18 29 Sept – 31 Oct · 28 days played
2,7763,726peak 3,72629 Sept31 Oct
3,880Peak Premier in tracked matches
31Days played since 2026-09-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 640 below peak (3,726)
  • -537 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 — 1,914 to go

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCaillou_Der_Sternenzerstö…FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER3,086 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning55
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–56–2Last 10042%Win rateWLWLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · +1ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 694ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 667ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 667ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility4.5
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch2.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 55% on T to 36% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 666ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.5
Utility4.5
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time654ms+7ms
first ⅓ avg 647ms → last ⅓ avg 654ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–10 · dust2, 5 Oct →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · anubis, 23 Oct →
453msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 24 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 22 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 58% over 12mirageWeakest map · 19% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2010–1050%0.01
mirageD163–1319%0.00
nukeC146–843%0.03
infernoD133–1023%0.01
cacheA127–558%-0.00
ancientA95–456%0.02
anubisC73–443%0.02
train—41–325%-0.00
vertigo—32–167%-0.03
office—11–0100%0.04
poseidon—11–0100%0.15

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (19% over 16). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

12Matches
42%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
81.9ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2450%0.8013.5
Mirage30%0.9116.3
Anubis250%1.1522.5
Nuke1100%2.3314.0
Ancient10%0.8315.0
Inferno1100%1.0014.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.7%Spray accuracy
73.5%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
666msReaction time
54.5%T opening success
35.7%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
9.22HE damage / grenade
8.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4986 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 35.6633% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

19% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust216–13-0.0414%31 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0526%31 Oct →
dust213–110.0115%31 Oct →
nuke9–130.0317%30 Oct →
ancient13–30.0225%30 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0512%30 Oct →
ancient4–130.0626%29 Oct →
office13–110.0420%28 Oct →
dust27–130.0813%27 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0810%27 Oct →
dust213–80.0514%26 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0619%25 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0121%24 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0512%24 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0020%24 Oct →
vertigo2–2-0.039%24 Oct →
ancient13–4-0.0316%24 Oct →
inferno6–130.0315%24 Oct →
dust28–130.0220%24 Oct →
dust213–70.0316%23 Oct →
anubis13–40.0239%23 Oct →
train12–120.0424%22 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0334%22 Oct →
inferno13–00.0120%22 Oct →
cache13–110.0513%22 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.019%21 Oct →
cache13–110.0211%21 Oct →
cache13–110.0222%21 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0513%20 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0212%20 Oct →
inferno6–130.0214%20 Oct →
cache4–130.0221%20 Oct →
anubis13–90.0510%20 Oct →
poseidon9–30.1516%19 Oct →
dust210–130.0316%19 Oct →
anubis13–50.1222%19 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0322%19 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.049%17 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0421%17 Oct →
mirage13–30.1220%17 Oct →
cache4–13-0.1212%16 Oct →
dust213–10.0129%16 Oct →
dust29–130.0214%16 Oct →
mirage13–30.0814%16 Oct →
nuke6–130.0733%14 Oct →
vertigo13–10-0.0219%14 Oct →
mirage10–130.068%13 Oct →
nuke13–20.039%13 Oct →
mirage9–130.0215%12 Oct →
mirage3–130.0513%12 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0415%12 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0715%11 Oct →
mirage9–130.1121%11 Oct →
inferno6–9-0.0116%11 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0626%11 Oct →
vertigo6–9-0.0622%11 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.069%11 Oct →
ancient8–130.1015%11 Oct →
train3–13-0.079%11 Oct →
nuke13–00.0323%10 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0125%10 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0718%10 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0116%10 Oct →
dust20–13-0.0711%10 Oct →
cache16–140.067%10 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0012%10 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0017%9 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0611%9 Oct →
dust213–5-0.049%9 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0710%9 Oct →
ancient13–80.0711%9 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0115%8 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0417%7 Oct →
inferno13–30.0818%7 Oct →
dust213–7-0.037%7 Oct →
train13–60.0118%7 Oct →
train0–130.0111%7 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0415%7 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0618%7 Oct →
inferno13–90.0913%6 Oct →
dust213–100.2318%5 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.036%4 Oct →
anubis14–160.0019%3 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0017%3 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0016%3 Oct →
cache9–130.0317%3 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0414%3 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.037%3 Oct →
dust211–130.0520%2 Oct →
nuke13–30.1913%2 Oct →
ancient13–80.0423%2 Oct →
nuke13–60.0225%1 Oct →
dust210–130.0319%1 Oct →
nuke11–130.0114%30 Sept →
inferno4–130.0310%30 Sept →
nuke13–10.1028%30 Sept →
anubis12–120.0114%30 Sept →
inferno6–130.0420%29 Sept →
cache13–10.0436%29 Sept →
nuke13–30.0832%29 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.