ItsHypnotix

ItsHypnotix — CS2 Stats

NL76561198254260308[U:1:293994580]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

916Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,981Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,255 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 52 days played since 8 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,696 +1,031 29 Mar17 Jun · 10 days played
16,66517,954peak 17,95429 Mar17 Jun
18,072Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,255Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2026-02-08

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,255
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 96 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,082), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate43.2%44.8%45.7%2.6% short
Shot accuracy14.7%12.5%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.191.041.05above
Match win rate48.4%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGItsHypnotixFACEITLevel 6 · 1,255 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,255csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning54
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45532Last 10045%Win rateLWWLWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +3.5pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 716ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 601ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility3.4
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.4
Utility3.4
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time580ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 582ms → last ⅓ avg 580ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–8 · office, 26 May
75%Best headshot accuracy · 1–7 · office, 13 Sept
359msFastest reaction time · 0–6 · office, 21 Jun
13–2Biggest win · office, 26 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
53In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
officeC39172244%0.02
infernoA159660%-0.00
ancientA106460%0.01
anubisD82625%0.01
nukeC73443%-0.02
overpassS64267%0.02
vertigoD62433%0.01
train42250%0.05
cache2020%0.01
dust21010%-0.03
italy1010%-0.11
mirage1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

57,629Lifetime kills
1.19K/D · Top 25% of Level 6 players
2,673Matches
48.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 6 players
43.2%Headshot %
14.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 6 players
7,119MVPs
1,312Hours (in match)
3,663Bombs planted
713Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

13,358inferno
1,817dust2
1,760nuke
1,407office
754vertigo
512train
335cbble
88aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

37Matches
76%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
77.3ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
36%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient888%1.1217.1
Inferno7100%1.5415.0
Anubis4100%1.4815.0
Nuke475%0.8110.8
Overpass1100%0.578.0
Dust210%0.7014.0
Train1100%1.6710.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
75.2%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
581msReaction time
42.2%T opening success
41.9%CT opening success
0.32Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
8.76HE damage / grenade
5.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3196 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office2–13-0.0740%19 Sept
ancient13–60.0611%19 Sept
inferno13–60.0311%17 Sept
office1–7-0.0075%13 Sept
office13–70.0710%28 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0316%28 Aug
inferno13–80.0516%28 Aug
cache9–130.0416%7 Jul
office0–6-0.0513%21 Jun
office8–130.0817%20 Jun
train13–110.1120%18 Jun
ancient13–100.0411%17 Jun
overpass2–13-0.0721%17 Jun
overpass13–50.0924%14 Jun
inferno5–9-0.1524%14 Jun
inferno10–130.0124%14 Jun
dust27–13-0.0318%14 Jun
office4–130.0420%13 Jun
ancient8–130.0114%13 Jun
inferno13–90.0515%11 Jun
office8–13-0.0319%10 Jun
office4–13-0.0111%10 Jun
ancient13–90.0116%8 Jun
vertigo13–50.0512%8 Jun
inferno13–110.0914%8 Jun
vertigo11–130.0216%7 Jun
office6–130.0117%7 Jun
office11–130.0132%4 Jun
office13–80.0726%28 May
nuke10–13-0.078%28 May
anubis7–13-0.0212%28 May
office13–80.1217%26 May
office10–130.0418%22 May
office13–80.0716%21 May
office5–80.0118%13 May
office9–13-0.0214%10 May
office13–100.0217%7 May
nuke9–130.0116%2 May
overpass13–100.0621%2 May
cache3–13-0.0125%2 May
train4–13-0.0120%27 Apr
office5–50.0537%27 Apr
office13–9-0.0427%27 Apr
office3–60.0340%26 Apr
office13–20.0114%26 Apr
office13–60.0923%25 Apr
italy5–13-0.1110%25 Apr
train4–130.0438%23 Apr
train13–100.0831%22 Apr
ancient13–50.0010%22 Apr
anubis14–16-0.0216%20 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0122%20 Apr
office13–70.0025%19 Apr
office3–13-0.0129%19 Apr
office13–9-0.0521%17 Apr
vertigo13–40.0816%12 Apr
vertigo6–13-0.1012%12 Apr
office13–100.0623%6 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0122%6 Apr
office4–13-0.0434%5 Apr
anubis13–60.1215%5 Apr
anubis3–130.0513%5 Apr
office13–100.0523%2 Apr
office6–130.0139%31 Mar
ancient13–40.0326%31 Mar
inferno15–15-0.0322%31 Mar
nuke16–130.0114%30 Mar
nuke16–14-0.0120%29 Mar
nuke12–16-0.0420%29 Mar
inferno13–30.069%29 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0317%28 Mar
ancient7–130.0321%28 Mar
anubis16–14-0.0313%28 Mar
ancient7–130.0123%28 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0513%26 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0214%26 Mar
office6–130.0324%24 Mar
inferno16–12-0.0215%23 Mar
office13–50.1222%22 Mar
overpass13–60.0316%22 Mar
inferno13–50.0323%22 Mar
overpass8–130.0220%22 Mar
nuke5–13-0.0414%22 Mar
inferno15–15-0.019%16 Mar
overpass16–120.0013%16 Mar
office10–130.0433%17 Feb
inferno13–100.0320%17 Feb
inferno7–13-0.1213%15 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0311%14 Feb
office6–130.0121%14 Feb
vertigo10–130.0116%14 Feb
vertigo10–130.0311%14 Feb
office1–13-0.0823%13 Feb
office13–7-0.0222%13 Feb
ancient2–13-0.0814%13 Feb
office13–30.0713%12 Feb
office5–13-0.0213%12 Feb
office10–13-0.0411%10 Feb
office13–90.0716%8 Feb
anubis10–130.0119%8 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →