psema

psema — CS2 Stats

76561198158720087[U:1:198454359]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

849Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
933Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.0 LearningSupport
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,050 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 60 days played since 11 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,707 +157 29 Mar6 Jul · 9 days played
12,55013,605peak 13,60529 Mar6 Jul
13,605Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,050Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
60Days played since 2026-02-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,050
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 1 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,195), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate38.3%42.7%43.8%5.5% short
Shot accuracy7.1%11.3%12.0%4.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.870.991.020.15 short
Match win rate42.3%43.9%44.7%2.4% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 5 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpsemaFACEITLevel 4 · 1,050 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,050csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim32
Positioning44
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47476Last 10047%Win rateLWWLWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +1.8pp headshot accuracy · −61ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 494ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim3.2
Utility4.6
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 67% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 61% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.2
Positioning4.4
Utility4.6
Mechanics2.4
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact2.1

Composite 3.0/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time586ms−52ms
first ⅓ avg 638ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy14.2%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 14.8% → last ⅓ avg 14.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 9–5 · nuke, 22 May
64%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · ancient, 13 Feb
391msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · ancient, 13 Jun
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 1 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 8anubisWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
officeB37191851%-0.02
infernoB168850%-0.02
nukeS86275%0.01
anubisD81713%-0.05
vertigoC83538%-0.04
ancientD62433%-0.02
train42250%-0.02
overpass43175%-0.02
mirage3030%-0.02
poseidon21150%-0.03
cache21150%-0.06
dust221150%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

22,889Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
1,336Matches
42.3%Match win rate
38.3%Headshot %
7.1%Shot accuracy
2,303MVPs
630Hours (in match)
1,677Bombs planted
188Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,500inferno
1,319nuke
948vertigo
865office
241train
176dust2
30italy
19lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

5Matches
60%Win rate
0.73Avg K/D
51.9ADR
28%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno450%0.7710.8
Anubis1100%0.609.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.5%Headshot accuracy
29.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.6%Spray accuracy
60.9%Counter-strafing
12.5°Preaim
558msReaction time
23.7%T opening success
47.3%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
7.33HE damage / grenade
9.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.4682° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.4512% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  3. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.479 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office2–13-0.0113%19 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0213%19 Sept
inferno13–6-0.010%17 Sept
office1–70.0025%13 Sept
office13–7-0.025%28 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0415%28 Aug
inferno13–8-0.067%28 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0213%20 Aug
anubis6–13-0.1443%12 Jul
office13–7-0.0718%9 Jul
office13–40.0514%8 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0513%6 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0610%22 Jun
office0–6-0.0733%21 Jun
train13–110.0011%18 Jun
office4–13-0.0915%13 Jun
ancient8–13-0.078%13 Jun
office4–13-0.059%10 Jun
vertigo13–50.0417%8 Jun
inferno13–11-0.062%8 Jun
vertigo11–13-0.0611%7 Jun
office6–13-0.0512%7 Jun
office11–13-0.0219%4 Jun
office8–13-0.0319%1 Jun
office13–7-0.0616%30 May
vertigo5–9-0.127%30 May
anubis7–13-0.0415%28 May
poseidon7–9-0.0513%22 May
office10–13-0.0421%22 May
nuke9–50.0913%22 May
inferno9–30.0112%22 May
office13–80.009%21 May
office9–13-0.0818%10 May
cache12–12-0.033%30 Apr
cache13–10-0.0813%30 Apr
train4–13-0.0321%27 Apr
office5–50.048%27 Apr
office13–9-0.0419%27 Apr
office3–6-0.040%26 Apr
office13–20.0317%26 Apr
office13–6-0.0414%25 Apr
train4–13-0.0614%23 Apr
train13–100.0011%22 Apr
ancient13–5-0.038%22 Apr
office13–7-0.034%19 Apr
office3–13-0.046%19 Apr
office13–10-0.0314%18 Apr
office13–9-0.023%17 Apr
inferno5–9-0.0718%16 Apr
vertigo13–4-0.026%12 Apr
vertigo6–13-0.0324%12 Apr
office13–10-0.0221%6 Apr
anubis7–13-0.076%6 Apr
inferno8–8-0.0315%6 Apr
poseidon9–7-0.0222%6 Apr
nuke9–00.013%6 Apr
office4–13-0.0417%5 Apr
anubis13–60.015%5 Apr
anubis3–13-0.0210%5 Apr
office13–10-0.0711%2 Apr
anubis6–13-0.037%1 Apr
inferno13–00.0815%1 Apr
inferno15–15-0.0613%31 Mar
nuke16–13-0.0311%30 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0312%30 Mar
nuke16–14-0.0011%29 Mar
ancient9–130.0425%28 Mar
dust213–110.0630%27 Mar
anubis5–13-0.048%24 Mar
office6–130.0514%24 Mar
inferno16–12-0.0415%23 Mar
office13–50.0518%22 Mar
overpass13–60.0134%22 Mar
inferno8–130.0111%19 Mar
nuke3–130.0110%19 Mar
mirage8–130.059%19 Mar
inferno15–15-0.023%16 Mar
overpass16–12-0.0418%16 Mar
inferno13–3-0.049%15 Mar
ancient11–130.0415%14 Mar
nuke13–70.0113%14 Mar
vertigo13–7-0.054%13 Mar
overpass13–6-0.0010%13 Mar
overpass8–13-0.047%13 Mar
office0–9-0.080%26 Feb
office12–120.0417%22 Feb
nuke8–80.0024%22 Feb
inferno9–60.029%22 Feb
office13–5-0.028%19 Feb
dust210–130.0311%19 Feb
mirage11–13-0.067%16 Feb
inferno7–130.0324%15 Feb
office6–13-0.0310%14 Feb
vertigo10–13-0.029%14 Feb
vertigo10–13-0.0411%14 Feb
office13–7-0.0219%13 Feb
ancient2–13-0.0764%13 Feb
office13–3-0.0212%12 Feb
office5–130.0212%12 Feb
office13–50.0520%11 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →