CR1MS1C

CR1MS1C — CS2 Stats

76561198202147671[U:1:241881943]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,185Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#50293 of 238387 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 54 days played since 7 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,158 +147 11 Jan13 Jan · 2 days played
22,01122,158peak 22,15811 Jan13 Jan
22,158Peak Premier in tracked matches
54Days played since 2026-01-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCR1MS1CFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning44
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY37567Last 10037%Win rateLWWWWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −7.6pp headshot accuracy · +76ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 532ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.1
Utility3.8
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch0.0

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 47% on T to 30% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Counter-strafing. Only 59% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning4.4
Utility3.8
Mechanics2.0
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time553ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 567ms → last ⅓ avg 553ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%−6.2%
first ⅓ avg 26.2% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–7 · office, 28 Aug
58%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · office, 28 May
344msFastest reaction time · 5–8 · office, 13 May
13–2Biggest win · office, 26 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
24In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 71% over 7anubisWeakest map · 17% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
officeC56203636%-0.02
anubisD1221017%-0.05
nukeB84450%0.02
infernoS75271%-0.01
ancientA53260%-0.01
vertigoD51420%-0.05
train41325%-0.03
overpass110100%-0.05
cache1010%-0.08
italy1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

18Matches
83%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
69.9ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

17%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient786%0.9713.4
Inferno580%1.1714.8
Anubis4100%1.5711.8
Dust210%0.7311.0
Nuke1100%1.3013.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
59.1%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
549msReaction time
47.5%T opening success
30.2%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
6.04HE damage / grenade
5.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3953 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 30.1984% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office2–13-0.0420%19 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0310%19 Sept
inferno13–6-0.0224%17 Sept
office13–70.1233%28 Aug
nuke13–60.0127%28 Aug
inferno13–80.0113%28 Aug
office8–13-0.0518%30 Jul
office3–13-0.0620%30 Jul
office0–60.018%21 Jun
office8–13-0.065%20 Jun
office4–13-0.0916%13 Jun
office8–130.0119%10 Jun
office4–13-0.0354%10 Jun
vertigo11–13-0.0817%7 Jun
office6–13-0.0713%7 Jun
office11–13-0.0321%4 Jun
office13–70.0820%30 May
office13–8-0.0658%28 May
nuke10–13-0.0410%28 May
office13–8-0.0125%26 May
office13–80.0712%21 May
office5–8-0.0740%13 May
office9–13-0.0218%10 May
office13–10-0.0113%7 May
nuke9–130.019%2 May
overpass13–10-0.0512%2 May
cache3–13-0.0815%2 May
train4–13-0.0113%27 Apr
office5–5-0.016%27 Apr
office13–9-0.084%27 Apr
office3–6-0.140%26 Apr
office13–2-0.0140%26 Apr
office13–6-0.1244%25 Apr
italy5–13-0.0625%25 Apr
train4–13-0.0711%23 Apr
train13–10-0.065%22 Apr
ancient13–50.0315%22 Apr
anubis14–16-0.0615%20 Apr
inferno13–10-0.028%20 Apr
office13–7-0.0542%19 Apr
office3–13-0.0450%19 Apr
office13–90.0652%17 Apr
vertigo13–4-0.0117%12 Apr
vertigo6–13-0.097%12 Apr
office13–100.0229%6 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0528%6 Apr
office4–13-0.0628%5 Apr
anubis13–6-0.0815%5 Apr
anubis3–13-0.108%5 Apr
office13–100.0039%2 Apr
office6–13-0.0420%31 Mar
ancient13–40.0113%31 Mar
inferno15–150.0116%31 Mar
nuke16–140.0415%29 Mar
nuke12–160.0126%29 Mar
inferno13–3-0.0215%29 Mar
office10–13-0.0423%7 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0015%7 Mar
inferno5–13-0.0419%7 Mar
anubis4–13-0.0931%26 Feb
office0–9-0.0631%26 Feb
office12–12-0.0130%24 Feb
office10–13-0.0138%22 Feb
ancient7–130.0117%22 Feb
office12–120.0038%22 Feb
office10–13-0.0019%17 Feb
inferno13–10-0.0128%17 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0711%14 Feb
office6–13-0.0718%14 Feb
vertigo10–13-0.0431%14 Feb
vertigo10–13-0.0511%14 Feb
office1–13-0.0613%13 Feb
office13–70.0132%13 Feb
ancient2–13-0.0417%13 Feb
office13–30.0236%12 Feb
office5–13-0.0521%12 Feb
office13–50.0233%11 Feb
office0–4-0.050%11 Feb
office10–13-0.0238%10 Feb
office13–9-0.0229%8 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0435%8 Feb
office9–13-0.0527%7 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0718%7 Feb
anubis12–12-0.0025%7 Feb
office3–13-0.0042%2 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0824%2 Feb
office6–13-0.0342%1 Feb
nuke13–90.0010%1 Feb
train12–120.0422%30 Jan
office13–50.0953%30 Jan
anubis13–20.0117%26 Jan
office3–130.0453%24 Jan
office12–12-0.0535%24 Jan
office9–13-0.0525%24 Jan
office12–12-0.0326%23 Jan
nuke13–20.0915%13 Jan
office11–130.0140%12 Jan
office7–130.0230%11 Jan
nuke4–130.0122%11 Jan
office13–5-0.0513%7 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →