pizztolz

pizztolz — CS2 Stats

NO76561198250266704[U:1:290000976]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,315Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,902Hours in CS22Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,528Top 50% of 190,010 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#85091 of 237738 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 990 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−359Premier CS Rating · 19,887 → 19,528
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 38 days played since 12 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,528 -4,893 15 May22 Sept · 14 days played
18,98924,421peak 24,42115 May22 Sept
24,421Peak Premier in tracked matches
990Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-05-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 990
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 61 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,893 below peak (24,421)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 472 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches28
Win rate50%
K/D1.07
Headshot %46%

Measured 14 Sep 202622 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,195), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate33.6%42.7%43.8%10.2% short
Shot accuracy7.2%11.3%12.0%4.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.990.991.020.03 short
Match win rate41.3%43.9%44.7%3.4% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 5 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpizztolzFACEITLevel 4 · 990 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER19,528 · Purple bandPEAK ELO990csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning60
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41563Last 10041%Win rateLWLWLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +3.2pp headshot accuracy · −36ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility4.3
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning6.0
Utility4.3
Mechanics3.8
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time545ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 545ms
Headshot accuracy15.2%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 13.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 16–14 · inferno, 22 Sept
47%Best headshot accuracy · 4–9 · inferno, 20 Sept
375msFastest reaction time · 9–7 · inferno, 13 May
13–3Biggest win · ancient, 15 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 50% over 12anubisWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC23101343%0.01
mirageC1771041%-0.02
ancientB157847%0.01
dust2C135838%0.01
nukeB126650%0.01
anubisD92722%0.02
cacheC52340%0.01
overpass21150%-0.05
vertigo2020%-0.00
italy1010%0.03
poseidon110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

54,583Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
3,257Matches
41.3%Match win rate
33.6%Headshot %
7.2%Shot accuracy
8,038MVPs
989Hours (in match)
3,679Bombs planted
729Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4715,390
AWP4,145
P902,872
MP91,374
MAC-101,309
Negev1,028

Lifetime map wins

3,462inferno
2,143vertigo
1,961dust2
1,194nuke
646train
290cbble
188office
111lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

4Matches
25%Win rate
0.82Avg K/D
67.5ADR
31%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient10%0.6712.0
Inferno1100%1.3811.0
Dust210%0.6813.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.8%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
67.0%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
542msReaction time
39.9%T opening success
56.8%CT opening success
0.37Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
11.78HE damage / grenade
4.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.8191% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3744 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.9257% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust24–13-0.015%22 Sept
inferno13–100.029%22 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0123%22 Sept
inferno16–140.1518%22 Sept
mirage7–13-0.006%21 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0311%20 Sept
nuke6–9-0.0224%20 Sept
inferno8–130.0016%20 Sept
inferno4–9-0.0747%20 Sept
dust213–70.0018%20 Sept
italy3–90.0326%20 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0020%19 Sept
dust24–130.0710%18 Sept
anubis13–100.075%18 Sept
dust216–140.0323%16 Sept
cache16–14-0.008%15 Sept
ancient13–30.0515%15 Sept
poseidon9–30.0712%15 Sept
nuke8–8-0.0414%14 Sept
anubis2–13-0.0411%14 Sept
ancient13–5-0.0115%14 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0420%14 Sept
dust28–130.0328%13 Sept
ancient13–100.0212%13 Sept
mirage7–130.0012%13 Sept
nuke13–60.099%12 Sept
ancient13–110.0314%12 Sept
ancient13–50.0518%12 Sept
cache6–130.0112%12 Sept
inferno13–100.016%12 Sept
inferno10–13-0.016%12 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0312%6 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0217%6 Sept
dust26–130.0211%5 Sept
ancient10–13-0.016%2 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0120%2 Sept
dust29–130.0514%1 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0116%1 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0620%1 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0220%1 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0612%1 Sept
dust22–13-0.0120%1 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0222%31 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0521%31 Aug
mirage13–40.0420%30 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0210%28 Aug
nuke13–50.0816%28 Aug
anubis13–40.0617%28 Aug
anubis14–160.0012%26 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0611%26 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0216%26 Aug
cache13–11-0.029%25 Aug
inferno11–130.0616%24 Aug
ancient9–130.0116%24 Aug
ancient15–150.0313%23 Aug
nuke13–40.0613%23 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0210%22 Aug
ancient13–80.0310%21 Aug
inferno5–13-0.016%21 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0219%21 Aug
ancient10–130.0419%21 Aug
mirage13–8-0.064%20 Aug
mirage10–13-0.086%9 Jun
anubis8–130.0313%3 Jun
mirage13–100.1010%3 Jun
inferno11–13-0.027%3 Jun
overpass13–8-0.0421%2 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0622%2 Jun
inferno13–40.0818%2 Jun
dust27–13-0.0320%1 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0310%1 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0211%1 Jun
ancient16–130.0012%1 Jun
nuke5–130.0716%1 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0214%30 May
dust28–13-0.0710%30 May
overpass8–13-0.078%30 May
ancient6–13-0.0520%27 May
inferno13–40.0518%26 May
inferno12–120.118%26 May
inferno8–13-0.0112%25 May
inferno13–100.0210%25 May
dust213–40.1312%19 May
mirage8–13-0.0016%19 May
vertigo2–13-0.0416%19 May
nuke8–13-0.0414%19 May
mirage13–11-0.067%19 May
nuke5–13-0.0021%19 May
anubis11–130.0716%18 May
inferno13–6-0.069%15 May
dust213–10-0.0412%15 May
cache8–13-0.0124%14 May
inferno13–30.038%14 May
cache4–130.0611%14 May
vertigo7–90.0314%13 May
inferno9–13-0.068%13 May
inferno13–70.0314%13 May
inferno9–7-0.005%13 May
ancient3–13-0.0311%12 May
dust213–100.037%12 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →