buttcrust32

buttcrust32 — CS2 Stats

76561198245112908[U:1:284847180]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

755Tracked matches63%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,326Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,786 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (48 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,786 → 1,786
+5Tracked matches · now 755
−6.7ppWin rate · 70.0% → 63.3%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,786 +0 31 Aug – 20 Sept · 2 observations
1,7861,786peak 1,78631 Aug20 Sept
1,786Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
58Days played since 2025-12-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,786
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 215 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate49.3%48.2%50.9%1.6% short
Shot accuracy8.8%13.2%13.7%4.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.251.071.09above
Match win rate49.1%46.9%48.4%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbuttcrust32FACEITLevel 9 · 1,786 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,786csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning60
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–41–1Last 10058%Win rateLLLLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −7.4pp headshot accuracy · −10ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 472ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 510ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 515ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility4.6
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.8
Clutch2.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning6.0
Utility4.6
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time511ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 562ms → last ⅓ avg 511ms
Headshot accuracy26.7%+7.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 26.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–7 · dust2, 4 Jan →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 16–13 · anubis, 6 Aug →
391msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · dust2, 3 Nov →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 11 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L4Current streak
8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 15anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3521–1460%0.02
mirageA3321–1264%0.00
nukeS1510–567%0.01
ancientB115–645%0.01
anubisD51–420%-0.02
overpass—10–10%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

28,752Lifetime kills
1.25K/D · Top 25% of Level 9 players
1,175Matches
49.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
49.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
8.8%Shot accuracy
3,606MVPs
927Hours (in match)
970Bombs planted
364Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,406dust2
779nuke
539inferno
381vertigo
69train
14cbble
8militia
3lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

322Matches
55%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
88.3ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11856%1.1517.6
Dust26958%1.2317.3
Ancient3850%1.1817.1
Nuke3850%1.1215.8
Inferno1765%1.0115.8
Anubis1741%1.1517.2
Overpass1030%1.0717.6
Vertigo786%1.1716.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.8%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.8%Spray accuracy
87.0%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
508msReaction time
44.3%T opening success
53.9%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
7.81HE damage / grenade
9.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–130.0427%3 Nov →
mirage8–130.0225%3 Nov →
dust23–13-0.0214%3 Nov →
ancient7–13-0.0218%3 Nov →
dust213–30.1028%13 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0115%26 Aug →
dust24–130.0426%20 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0122%18 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0219%15 Aug →
mirage13–90.0624%15 Aug →
dust213–3-0.0033%15 Aug →
mirage13–70.0222%15 Aug →
mirage13–00.1232%11 Aug →
ancient13–80.0131%11 Aug →
dust213–90.0325%7 Aug →
mirage7–130.0117%7 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0527%7 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0319%7 Aug →
anubis16–130.0150%6 Aug →
dust213–80.0734%6 Aug →
mirage13–90.0328%6 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0317%6 Aug →
dust213–60.0522%6 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0532%6 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0350%6 Aug →
dust210–130.0529%5 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0120%4 Aug →
mirage13–80.0539%31 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0230%29 Jul →
dust213–100.0620%17 Jul →
mirage8–130.0138%15 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0426%14 Jul →
ancient13–100.0421%14 Jul →
mirage15–19-0.0023%14 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0123%14 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0117%14 Jul →
dust27–130.0723%11 Jul →
dust213–90.0125%9 Jun →
anubis8–13-0.0323%9 Jun →
nuke11–130.0122%8 Jun →
anubis9–13-0.0623%8 Jun →
mirage13–11-0.0027%3 Jun →
nuke13–30.0116%3 Jun →
mirage13–60.0021%3 Jun →
anubis7–13-0.0317%14 May →
nuke13–6-0.0320%13 May →
nuke13–60.0041%13 May →
nuke10–13-0.0611%7 May →
ancient9–130.0518%7 May →
nuke13–30.0740%7 May →
mirage19–17-0.0029%6 May →
mirage13–50.0515%5 May →
mirage13–110.0038%4 May →
ancient8–13-0.0028%4 May →
ancient13–70.0721%30 Apr →
mirage16–130.0420%23 Apr →
ancient13–100.0223%17 Apr →
dust213–90.0326%16 Apr →
mirage7–130.0416%16 Apr →
nuke13–40.0519%16 Apr →
mirage19–160.0225%14 Apr →
dust213–110.0320%9 Apr →
ancient10–13-0.0323%8 Apr →
mirage9–13-0.0516%7 Apr →
mirage13–100.0133%7 Apr →
anubis8–13-0.0118%20 Mar →
ancient13–8-0.0219%20 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.0521%20 Mar →
dust212–16-0.0124%18 Mar →
nuke13–30.0721%18 Mar →
nuke14–16-0.0120%18 Mar →
nuke9–13-0.0322%17 Mar →
mirage16–13-0.0319%17 Mar →
mirage8–130.0016%15 Mar →
nuke13–100.0520%2 Mar →
dust29–130.0216%1 Mar →
dust213–4-0.0317%28 Feb →
nuke13–60.0525%26 Feb →
nuke13–50.0316%17 Feb →
overpass6–13-0.0530%13 Feb →
dust213–6-0.0220%11 Feb →
dust213–30.0216%11 Feb →
dust210–130.0220%10 Feb →
dust213–10-0.0220%6 Feb →
mirage13–10-0.0513%3 Feb →
dust212–120.0317%3 Feb →
dust213–60.0615%29 Jan →
mirage6–13-0.0612%27 Jan →
dust20–13-0.090%27 Jan →
mirage8–13-0.0314%23 Jan →
dust25–13-0.1126%20 Jan →
mirage14–160.0115%13 Jan →
mirage10–130.0227%12 Jan →
dust28–130.0117%8 Jan →
dust213–10-0.0215%8 Jan →
dust25–130.0824%4 Jan →
dust213–70.2232%4 Jan →
dust213–60.0916%30 Dec →
mirage16–13-0.0120%30 Dec →
mirage13–90.0319%29 Dec →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.