Joosepp1

Joosepp1 — CS2 Stats

MZ76561198233848396[U:1:273582668]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

821Tracked matches52%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,322Hours in CS72Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,124Top 50% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~12% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#97749 of 259992 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,021 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,124 -763 11 Oct – 4 Nov · 11 days played
18,77819,887peak 19,88711 Oct4 Nov
20,582Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,021Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-10-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,021
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 30 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 763 below peak (19,887)
  • -763 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 876 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate43.9%44.8%45.7%1.8% short
Shot accuracy3.8%12.4%12.7%8.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.721.031.050.33 short
Match win rate41.8%45.2%45.7%3.9% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 7 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJoosepp1FACEITLevel 6 · 1,021 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,124 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,021csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning63
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–50–2Last 10048%Win rateWLTWLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.4pp headshot accuracy · +14ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 532ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility5.3
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 550ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning6.3
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels6.6
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time544ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 583ms → last ⅓ avg 544ms
Headshot accuracy14.2%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 14.8% → last ⅓ avg 14.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–2 · inferno, 14 Oct →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–5 · cache, 3 Nov →
359msFastest reaction time · 0–5 · cache, 3 Nov →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 31 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
8–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 59% over 22mirageWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA2213–959%-0.00
nukeA2011–955%-0.00
anubisB178–947%-0.01
infernoD123–925%-0.02
dust2B126–650%-0.01
mirageD61–517%-0.03
vertigo—43–175%-0.04
ancient—42–250%0.01
poseidon—20–20%-0.02
train—11–0100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

29,650Lifetime kills
0.72K/D
1,837Matches
41.8%Match win rate
43.9%Headshot %
3.8%Shot accuracy
3,134MVPs
716Hours (in match)
1,534Bombs planted
340Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,285dust2
1,974nuke
1,585inferno
445train
276vertigo
16cbble
7ar_shoots
5aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

547Matches
50%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
76.8ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9651%0.9514.7
Nuke9052%0.9515.5
Anubis8059%0.9114.0
Ancient7947%0.8513.4
Inferno7441%0.9213.7
Dust26844%0.8812.5
Cache3757%0.9114.4
Overpass1662%1.0014.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.2%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
78.7%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
550msReaction time
59.8%T opening success
53.3%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
8.81HE damage / grenade
10.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.2278% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–10-0.007%4 Nov →
inferno1–13-0.0515%3 Nov →
cache15–150.0313%3 Nov →
cache13–60.0317%3 Nov →
cache0–5-0.0150%3 Nov →
inferno13–60.028%3 Nov →
dust213–10-0.0310%3 Nov →
anubis13–8-0.001%2 Nov →
nuke11–13-0.0622%2 Nov →
nuke13–160.0119%2 Nov →
nuke12–160.0613%1 Nov →
nuke16–140.0416%1 Nov →
nuke19–16-0.0210%1 Nov →
vertigo13–7-0.013%1 Nov →
nuke13–20.0012%31 Oct →
mirage9–80.0614%30 Oct →
cache13–100.0119%29 Oct →
dust25–13-0.079%29 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0631%29 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.1313%28 Oct →
nuke16–120.0418%28 Oct →
anubis13–70.0113%28 Oct →
cache13–100.0113%28 Oct →
anubis7–130.0819%27 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0610%27 Oct →
ancient6–130.0414%27 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0621%26 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0411%26 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0316%26 Oct →
inferno10–130.0118%25 Oct →
train5–10.000%25 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.085%25 Oct →
anubis13–80.058%25 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0318%25 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.026%25 Oct →
cache13–80.0520%25 Oct →
dust28–130.0810%24 Oct →
nuke8–130.096%24 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.018%24 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0228%24 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0225%24 Oct →
cache4–13-0.119%24 Oct →
anubis12–10.0430%24 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.0419%23 Oct →
nuke14–16-0.029%23 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0527%23 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0514%23 Oct →
anubis22–20-0.0111%22 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0813%21 Oct →
nuke13–50.0121%21 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.029%21 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0522%21 Oct →
nuke13–60.0012%21 Oct →
dust211–13-0.076%20 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0711%20 Oct →
cache9–13-0.055%20 Oct →
poseidon3–9-0.0215%19 Oct →
vertigo7–9-0.0726%19 Oct →
poseidon7–9-0.0144%19 Oct →
nuke8–11-0.0116%19 Oct →
cache13–80.0616%19 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0012%19 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0418%18 Oct →
dust24–130.0117%18 Oct →
inferno9–130.0026%18 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0410%18 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0620%18 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.105%18 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0328%18 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0612%17 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0114%17 Oct →
vertigo10–80.0221%16 Oct →
dust28–130.0215%15 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0315%15 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.047%15 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0211%15 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0216%15 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0114%15 Oct →
cache13–20.0624%15 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0913%15 Oct →
cache10–130.0015%15 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.055%15 Oct →
nuke13–70.0911%14 Oct →
dust213–110.0820%14 Oct →
inferno13–20.093%14 Oct →
ancient13–90.039%14 Oct →
cache7–130.0232%14 Oct →
vertigo13–10-0.0925%14 Oct →
dust210–13-0.047%14 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0216%14 Oct →
ancient13–20.0514%14 Oct →
cache13–100.0639%13 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0313%12 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.066%11 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0110%11 Oct →
anubis7–130.0015%11 Oct →
cache13–80.0410%11 Oct →
dust213–100.0611%11 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.076%10 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0628%10 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.