g0lb0r?!

g0lb0r?! — CS2 Stats

DE76561198202230744[U:1:241965016]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

521Tracked matches74%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,502Hours in CS47Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating13,363Blue band · top ~37.1% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,363 -251 11 Aug – 29 Oct · 43 days played
12,27415,500peak 15,50011 Aug29 Oct
15,500Peak Premier in tracked matches
44Days played since 2026-08-11

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,137 below peak (15,500)
  • -1,135 over 30 days · declining
  • -251 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,637 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-13
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=21,222), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate42.8%42.0%44.4%1.6% short
Shot accuracy14.4%9.6%11.9%above
Kill/death ratio0.810.981.030.23 short
Match win rate51.4%43.8%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGg0lb0r?!PREMIER13,363 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim49
Positioning45
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT55–41–4Last 10055%Win rateWWWWLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +6.3pp headshot accuracy · +16ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Last 20

  • 12–5–3 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 625ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+5.2 against its own average).

Aim4.9
Utility3.8
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch10.0

Strong T-side openerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 58% on T to 26% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.9
Positioning4.5
Utility3.8
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time617ms−0ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms
Headshot accuracy16.7%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 5–0 · inferno, 12 Aug →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · inferno, 13 Aug →
391msFastest reaction time · 1–9 · inferno, 29 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 24 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W4Current streak
7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 13dust2Weakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA169–756%-0.02
mirageC146–843%-0.02
dust2D133–1023%-0.04
ancientS139–469%-0.02
cacheS128–467%-0.00
nukeS128–467%-0.01
anubisA85–363%-0.03
boulder—42–250%-0.05
office—31–233%-0.01
train—11–0100%-0.02
fachwerk—11–0100%-0.00
shelter—10–10%-0.05
italy—11–0100%-0.05
poseidon—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

99,845Lifetime kills
0.81K/D
8,090Matches
51.4%Match win rate · Top 10% of Blue band
42.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Blue band
14.4%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Blue band
8,947MVPs
2,111Hours (in match)
3,792Bombs planted
743Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4731,448
AWP6,802
P902,883
P2502,562
FAMAS2,042

Lifetime map wins

7,871dust2
6,290nuke
6,227inferno
2,540cbble
1,053train
692vertigo
505aztec
390office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

190Matches
46%Win rate
0.69Avg K/D
55.8ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno540%0.477.4
Ancient333%0.679.0
Anubis250%0.7018.0
Cache250%0.648.5
Dust210%0.447.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy
31.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.0%Spray accuracy
71.6%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
609msReaction time
58.0%T opening success
26.2%CT opening success
0.37Enemies flashed / flash
1.3%Flash assists
7.93HE damage / grenade
5.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3748 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 26.2306% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
train13–9-0.0215%31 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0126%31 Oct →
office13–80.0118%31 Oct →
dust28–6-0.043%31 Oct →
office10–13-0.0226%31 Oct →
office6–13-0.0016%31 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0114%31 Oct →
cache13–4-0.0526%31 Oct →
nuke13–60.0013%31 Oct →
inferno3–10.1330%31 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0822%30 Oct →
nuke12–12-0.038%30 Oct →
fachwerk13–7-0.002%30 Oct →
boulder13–9-0.0415%30 Oct →
boulder9–13-0.059%30 Oct →
shelter8–13-0.058%30 Oct →
italy13–8-0.0515%30 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0325%30 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.009%29 Oct →
dust211–13-0.079%29 Oct →
cache13–60.0118%29 Oct →
poseidon9–70.0125%29 Oct →
inferno1–9-0.1614%29 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0017%28 Oct →
ancient13–3-0.0217%28 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0417%28 Oct →
mirage13–100.0116%26 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0320%22 Oct →
anubis13–100.0214%19 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0217%19 Oct →
ancient7–130.0014%18 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0126%14 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0529%14 Oct →
ancient16–140.0111%13 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0316%13 Oct →
cache13–100.0216%12 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0120%11 Oct →
mirage4–130.0312%11 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0120%4 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.1215%4 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0419%2 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0724%2 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0514%1 Oct →
nuke16–12-0.0425%29 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0810%22 Sept →
cache7–13-0.088%21 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.038%18 Sept →
dust25–13-0.044%9 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0119%8 Sept →
ancient13–2-0.038%7 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0211%7 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0722%6 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0311%4 Sept →
dust20–13-0.0919%4 Sept →
cache13–50.1325%3 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0211%2 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0026%2 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0417%31 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0810%31 Aug →
cache13–80.0118%31 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0512%30 Aug →
dust213–4-0.0823%30 Aug →
nuke13–50.0421%30 Aug →
boulder13–3-0.0313%30 Aug →
mirage7–20.0617%30 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0216%28 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0414%28 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0221%28 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0217%27 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0418%26 Aug →
dust213–16-0.0219%25 Aug →
anubis13–3-0.0212%25 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0512%24 Aug →
dust213–00.1324%24 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0116%23 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0016%23 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0518%22 Aug →
anubis1–13-0.090%22 Aug →
ancient13–110.0222%21 Aug →
inferno9–1-0.0513%21 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0525%21 Aug →
nuke13–5-0.0115%21 Aug →
ancient13–3-0.0219%21 Aug →
inferno9–130.0113%21 Aug →
nuke13–20.0825%19 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0116%19 Aug →
cache10–130.0020%18 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.034%18 Aug →
cache13–10.0112%17 Aug →
nuke13–5-0.0324%16 Aug →
dust25–13-0.108%16 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0226%14 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0416%14 Aug →
inferno13–70.0233%13 Aug →
cache13–90.0226%12 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0322%12 Aug →
inferno5–00.1514%12 Aug →
boulder12–12-0.105%11 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0120%11 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.1017%11 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.