Mxst4rd_Q_cumbA_KICK — CS2 Stats

DE76561198198067637[U:1:237801909]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,569Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,371 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94

Positioning65

Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–46–8Last 10046%Win rateWLLWLLTWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.4

Aggression8.2

Utility5.8

Positioning6.5

Opening Duels3.1

Clutch9.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingEffective flashesReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 608ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4

Positioning6.5

Utility5.8

Mechanics9.3

Opening Duels3.1

Win Impact2.6

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.05

Reaction time598ms−37ms

first ⅓ avg 634ms → last ⅓ avg 598ms

Headshot accuracy25.3%−0.0%

first ⅓ avg 25.3% → last ⅓ avg 25.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.28Best rating — poseidon 9–7

13–1Biggest win — cache

3Longest win streak

12–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 61% over 23ancientWeakest map · 18% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	23	14–9	61%	0.02
cache	B	15	8–7	53%	0.06
dust2	B	15	7–8	47%	0.01
inferno	D	13	4–9	31%	0.03
ancient	D	11	2–9	18%	0.01
vertigo	A	5	3–2	60%	0.06
overpass	—	4	0–4	0%	-0.06
poseidon	—	3	2–1	67%	0.16
nuke	—	3	3–0	100%	0.05
eldorado	—	2	1–1	50%	0.03
anubis	—	2	0–2	0%	0.04
fachwerk	—	1	0–1	0%	0.09
debris	—	1	1–0	100%	0.18
sanctum	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.16
rooftop	—	1	1–0	100%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,739Matches

51%Win rate

1.09Avg K/D

64.1ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

67%1v1 clutch win

50%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	8	75%	1.13	14.4
Ancient	4	75%	0.94	14.0
Nuke	2	100%	1.38	17.0
Dust2	2	0%	0.78	12.5
Vertigo	1	100%	1.75	21.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.8%Headshot accuracy

39.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.1%Spray accuracy

92.1%Counter-strafing

7.9°Preaim

608msReaction time

48.6%T opening success

36.5%CT opening success

0.75Enemies flashed / flash

12.9%Flash assists

10.31HE damage / grenade

6.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 36.5438% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	9–6	-0.04	17%	22 Aug →
overpass	6–9	-0.05	15%	22 Aug →
vertigo	6–9	-0.06	11%	17 Aug →
eldorado	9–5	0.11	39%	17 Aug →
fachwerk	11–13	0.09	22%	5 Aug →
poseidon	3–9	0.05	21%	24 Jul →
vertigo	8–8	0.01	45%	24 Jul →
inferno	9–6	0.24	24%	24 Jul →
debris	7–0	0.18	36%	10 Jul →
eldorado	6–9	-0.05	25%	10 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.13	32%	14 May →
ancient	9–13	-0.00	16%	14 May →
vertigo	9–7	0.09	18%	14 May →
poseidon	9–7	0.28	35%	14 May →
sanctum	0–9	-0.16	9%	14 May →
nuke	9–7	-0.02	25%	14 May →
inferno	3–9	-0.07	14%	14 May →
cache	13–6	0.01	31%	11 May →
cache	13–1	0.21	46%	11 May →
cache	10–13	0.16	24%	8 May →
cache	12–12	0.00	26%	3 May →
cache	1–13	-0.03	19%	3 May →
cache	3–13	-0.00	32%	3 May →
cache	11–13	-0.00	23%	2 May →
cache	13–7	0.05	13%	2 May →
cache	13–8	0.09	31%	2 May →
cache	13–5	0.01	25%	2 May →
cache	8–13	0.11	22%	1 May →
cache	11–13	0.15	25%	1 May →
cache	13–9	0.04	20%	29 Apr →
cache	13–5	0.00	42%	29 Apr →
overpass	11–13	-0.05	26%	27 Apr →
dust2	13–4	0.03	26%	22 Apr →
dust2	7–13	0.02	20%	11 Apr →
dust2	1–13	-0.02	32%	11 Apr →
mirage	13–9	0.01	18%	11 Apr →
inferno	7–13	-0.04	70%	10 Apr →
dust2	5–13	-0.01	67%	10 Apr →
nuke	13–6	0.13	59%	10 Apr →
mirage	13–16	-0.02	20%	10 Apr →
ancient	15–15	0.04	22%	10 Apr →
mirage	13–4	0.07	24%	10 Apr →
ancient	8–13	-0.05	20%	8 Apr →
dust2	10–13	0.03	37%	8 Apr →
anubis	3–13	0.05	27%	6 Apr →
dust2	13–11	0.01	20%	6 Apr →
mirage	10–13	0.02	12%	5 Apr →
dust2	13–3	0.13	26%	5 Apr →
ancient	6–13	-0.04	20%	5 Apr →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	16%	1 Apr →
dust2	13–10	0.02	31%	1 Apr →
dust2	13–11	-0.06	36%	1 Apr →
mirage	13–11	0.06	37%	1 Apr →
dust2	14–16	-0.02	33%	31 Mar →
dust2	13–10	0.03	33%	30 Mar →
mirage	13–10	0.05	30%	26 Mar →
mirage	2–13	-0.06	58%	20 Mar →
mirage	13–11	0.02	21%	20 Mar →
dust2	3–13	0.02	37%	16 Mar →
anubis	15–15	0.03	28%	16 Mar →
mirage	13–4	0.07	15%	16 Mar →
ancient	15–15	-0.01	23%	16 Mar →
mirage	13–6	0.07	26%	27 Feb →
mirage	8–13	0.07	24%	27 Feb →
dust2	13–7	0.04	31%	27 Feb →
mirage	13–9	-0.08	16%	27 Feb →
ancient	13–6	0.10	27%	25 Feb →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	27%	12 Feb →
mirage	13–7	0.06	20%	12 Feb →
poseidon	9–7	0.17	28%	29 Jan →
inferno	8–8	0.06	39%	29 Jan →
overpass	7–9	-0.07	6%	29 Jan →
mirage	13–7	0.07	23%	19 Dec →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	10%	19 Dec →
inferno	12–12	0.03	26%	7 Dec →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	18%	7 Dec →
inferno	9–1	0.11	19%	5 Dec →
nuke	9–5	0.03	15%	5 Dec →
inferno	9–7	0.06	26%	5 Dec →
overpass	6–9	-0.04	11%	5 Dec →
vertigo	9–2	0.20	23%	5 Dec →
vertigo	9–4	0.08	40%	4 Dec →
inferno	8–8	0.07	29%	4 Dec →
inferno	2–9	-0.07	27%	4 Dec →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	48%	30 Nov →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	28%	30 Nov →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	32%	30 Nov →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	27%	7 Nov →
rooftop	9–7	0.00	32%	4 Nov →
inferno	7–9	0.09	24%	4 Nov →
ancient	7–13	0.02	26%	3 Nov →
mirage	2–13	0.02	44%	3 Nov →
ancient	13–5	0.04	17%	1 Nov →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	29%	1 Nov →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	14%	1 Nov →
mirage	13–8	0.12	23%	31 Oct →
mirage	13–5	0.08	23%	31 Oct →
mirage	9–13	0.00	25%	31 Oct →
dust2	5–13	0.00	30%	30 Oct →
ancient	7–13	0.10	26%	29 Oct →