Urpo

Urpo — CS2 Stats

FI76561198194743135[U:1:234477407]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,712Tracked matches55%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,830Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,292 +9,722 13 Feb – 19 Mar · 24 days played
5,91717,986peak 17,98613 Feb19 Mar
17,986Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-02-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches3——
Win rate0%——
K/D0.65——
Headshot %61%——

Measured 14 Sep 2026 → 14 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,231), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate43.2%41.8%42.7%meets
Shot accuracy11.0%12.2%11.3%meets
Kill/death ratio0.960.980.990.03 short
Match win rate46.4%43.3%43.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGUrpoFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning51
Utility13

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD55–39–6Last 10055%Win rateLLLLLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −80pp win rate · −0.07 avg rating · +0.0pp headshot accuracy · +79ms reaction

Win rate down 80pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 738ms

Last 10

  • 1–9 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility1.3
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch2.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.1
Utility1.3
Mechanics3.7
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact6.7

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time554ms−116ms
first ⅓ avg 670ms → last ⅓ avg 554ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%+4.3%
first ⅓ avg 13.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–9 · anubis, 3 Mar →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · mirage, 25 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · dust2, 27 Feb →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 13 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
L6Current streak
4–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 81% over 16mirageWeakest map · 43% over 28
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2812–1643%-0.01
ancientB178–947%0.01
nukeS1613–381%0.01
anubisA149–564%0.04
overpassS86–275%0.02
dust2C73–443%0.00
inferno—43–175%0.01
train—31–233%0.02
office—20–20%-0.04
warden—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 28). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

63,160Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
4,135Matches
46.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 3 players
43.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
11.0%Shot accuracy
7,651MVPs
1,830Hours (in match)
2,725Bombs planted
822Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4712,992
AWP8,363
Knife1,829
AUG1,730
P901,585

Lifetime map wins

3,177nuke
3,106inferno
2,516dust2
2,122vertigo
548train
406office
270lake
202cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

44Matches
41%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
71.0ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1338%0.8512.1
Ancient743%0.9314.0
Anubis560%0.9012.2
Nuke540%1.0014.8
Vertigo333%0.7213.3
Dust220%0.689.5
Train1100%1.2931.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.4%Spray accuracy
66.8%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
547msReaction time
30.8%T opening success
45.8%CT opening success
0.13Enemies flashed / flash
1.2%Flash assists
7.28HE damage / grenade
1.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.1314 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.768% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 28 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient2–13-0.0625%3 Oct →
dust28–13-0.037%3 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0340%25 Sept →
warden3–13-0.0214%20 Apr →
office7–130.0118%20 Apr →
office2–13-0.089%20 Apr →
nuke13–10-0.0717%19 Mar →
ancient10–13-0.089%10 Mar →
anubis9–13-0.018%9 Mar →
overpass8–13-0.0418%9 Mar →
ancient13–6-0.0521%7 Mar →
nuke4–130.0118%6 Mar →
mirage13–40.0718%6 Mar →
anubis13–9-0.0420%6 Mar →
overpass13–100.0214%5 Mar →
nuke13–40.0814%5 Mar →
overpass13–90.0824%5 Mar →
ancient13–100.078%5 Mar →
ancient16–130.0411%4 Mar →
nuke13–50.0515%4 Mar →
mirage16–13-0.0712%4 Mar →
anubis3–13-0.0427%4 Mar →
ancient13–100.1016%4 Mar →
mirage13–10-0.0116%4 Mar →
mirage15–150.0326%4 Mar →
anubis13–90.1821%3 Mar →
overpass13–90.0837%3 Mar →
mirage6–130.0118%3 Mar →
ancient9–130.0719%3 Mar →
anubis13–40.0920%3 Mar →
inferno13–80.017%3 Mar →
train12–120.0130%2 Mar →
train13–70.0313%2 Mar →
anubis13–90.0333%1 Mar →
mirage13–90.0331%27 Feb →
anubis13–40.0621%27 Feb →
mirage15–15-0.0514%27 Feb →
dust210–130.0313%27 Feb →
ancient9–130.0511%27 Feb →
nuke13–70.0011%26 Feb →
mirage13–11-0.0317%26 Feb →
mirage15–150.0610%25 Feb →
mirage16–130.0210%25 Feb →
train8–130.0217%25 Feb →
nuke13–100.0432%25 Feb →
nuke9–4-0.0814%25 Feb →
inferno9–50.0625%25 Feb →
mirage15–150.1126%24 Feb →
nuke13–40.0013%24 Feb →
anubis13–90.0729%23 Feb →
nuke13–60.0712%23 Feb →
anubis13–70.0217%23 Feb →
mirage13–9-0.0013%23 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0019%23 Feb →
ancient13–5-0.025%23 Feb →
nuke13–50.1612%22 Feb →
dust213–60.0912%21 Feb →
nuke13–7-0.0210%21 Feb →
inferno10–13-0.0314%21 Feb →
ancient3–13-0.0312%20 Feb →
mirage13–10-0.0117%20 Feb →
overpass13–110.0615%20 Feb →
anubis13–110.0710%20 Feb →
anubis11–130.019%19 Feb →
ancient13–7-0.0110%19 Feb →
overpass13–50.0513%19 Feb →
mirage13–80.0313%19 Feb →
mirage9–13-0.0117%19 Feb →
mirage15–15-0.0325%19 Feb →
nuke16–140.0118%19 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0213%19 Feb →
anubis6–13-0.0515%19 Feb →
mirage13–100.016%19 Feb →
nuke13–5-0.0024%18 Feb →
dust213–90.0117%18 Feb →
anubis10–130.0322%17 Feb →
ancient13–20.0810%17 Feb →
mirage2–13-0.0410%17 Feb →
anubis13–70.1521%17 Feb →
nuke7–130.0234%16 Feb →
dust29–13-0.0218%16 Feb →
ancient10–130.0419%15 Feb →
mirage5–13-0.0812%15 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0324%14 Feb →
overpass5–13-0.057%14 Feb →
mirage13–10-0.030%14 Feb →
mirage13–2-0.005%14 Feb →
ancient7–13-0.0311%14 Feb →
ancient9–13-0.029%14 Feb →
ancient13–5-0.036%14 Feb →
mirage7–130.027%14 Feb →
nuke13–10.0322%13 Feb →
mirage14–16-0.065%13 Feb →
dust27–13-0.0310%13 Feb →
overpass13–5-0.059%13 Feb →
nuke10–13-0.072%13 Feb →
inferno13–10-0.028%13 Feb →
dust213–5-0.0313%13 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0717%13 Feb →
ancient3–13-0.0115%13 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.