Nope

Nope — CS2 Stats

GB76561198193230349[U:1:232964621]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

568Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,980Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (39 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 568 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,014 -1,988 19 May – 18 Jun · 14 days played
17,01419,014peak 19,01419 May18 Jun
19,014Peak Premier in tracked matches
39Days played since 2026-05-19

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate40.2%41.8%42.7%2.5% short
Shot accuracy16.2%12.2%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.300.980.99above
Match win rate36.3%43.3%43.9%7.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNopeFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning60
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–44–6Last 10050%Win rateLWLLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +3.8pp headshot accuracy · −20ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility2.9
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels3.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 566ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning6.0
Utility2.9
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time569ms−44ms
first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy16.3%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 9–0 · anubis, 1 Jun →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 8–1 · vertigo, 27 May →
375msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · shelter, 26 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 18 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 9dust2Weakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
shelterB147–750%0.02
nukeB147–750%0.01
infernoC104–640%0.02
cacheS96–367%0.03
dust2D92–722%0.00
fachwerkA85–363%0.03
boulderB84–450%0.01
vertigoB63–350%0.02
anubisS64–267%0.05
mirageC52–340%-0.02
overpass—42–250%-0.01
ancient—32–167%0.01
debris—22–0100%0.05
office—10–10%-0.02
eldorado—10–10%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

108,620Lifetime kills
1.30K/D · Top 10% of Level 3 players
4,940Matches
36.3%Match win rate
40.2%Headshot %
16.2%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 3 players
10,067MVPs
1,212Hours (in match)
2,918Bombs planted
605Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,261dust2
1,940nuke
1,854inferno
1,808vertigo
1,030office
518cbble
389train
216lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

5Matches
40%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
—ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Vertigo1100%0.7619.0
Anubis10%1.4423.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.5%Spray accuracy
74.1%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
566msReaction time
39.8%T opening success
39.6%CT opening success
0.32Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
6.02HE damage / grenade
3.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3227 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.8251% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–13-0.0116%31 Aug →
ancient13–100.0618%31 Aug →
shelter8–130.0221%25 Aug →
vertigo11–13-0.0322%25 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0415%25 Aug →
nuke13–4-0.0317%24 Aug →
fachwerk11–130.0518%24 Aug →
boulder7–13-0.0313%23 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0024%23 Aug →
shelter13–9-0.0018%22 Aug →
shelter7–13-0.0217%20 Aug →
office6–13-0.0212%20 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0111%30 Jul →
ancient13–100.0213%30 Jul →
cache13–80.1118%30 Jul →
anubis14–16-0.0420%29 Jul →
nuke13–110.1015%29 Jul →
boulder1–13-0.0218%29 Jul →
fachwerk4–130.0114%29 Jul →
fachwerk9–13-0.046%28 Jul →
shelter10–130.0018%28 Jul →
shelter8–13-0.0710%26 Jul →
cache13–30.0320%26 Jul →
shelter10–13-0.0216%25 Jul →
cache13–80.0819%24 Jul →
shelter13–70.0715%24 Jul →
boulder8–130.0213%24 Jul →
boulder12–12-0.019%22 Jul →
fachwerk13–110.0523%22 Jul →
boulder13–90.1321%21 Jul →
fachwerk13–11-0.0019%21 Jul →
debris9–60.037%21 Jul →
shelter10–130.0021%20 Jul →
fachwerk13–40.0719%19 Jul →
boulder13–30.0522%19 Jul →
shelter13–40.0022%16 Jul →
shelter13–80.1115%16 Jul →
boulder13–2-0.057%15 Jul →
fachwerk13–90.0714%15 Jul →
shelter13–40.0823%15 Jul →
shelter8–130.0616%13 Jul →
shelter13–90.0410%12 Jul →
fachwerk13–70.0710%12 Jul →
boulder13–6-0.0314%10 Jul →
eldorado8–80.0317%10 Jul →
shelter13–90.0210%9 Jul →
debris9–50.078%9 Jul →
dust23–130.0011%18 Jun →
nuke13–00.048%18 Jun →
inferno13–5-0.0220%7 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.0620%7 Jun →
overpass11–13-0.0617%7 Jun →
vertigo3–13-0.0114%5 Jun →
overpass9–130.0217%4 Jun →
inferno7–130.0413%4 Jun →
nuke10–130.0129%4 Jun →
nuke16–140.0619%2 Jun →
inferno15–150.0816%2 Jun →
nuke9–13-0.0418%1 Jun →
anubis9–00.1622%1 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0425%1 Jun →
dust28–130.0832%1 Jun →
dust212–120.0818%1 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0510%1 Jun →
vertigo11–130.0315%31 May →
mirage6–13-0.0524%31 May →
anubis6–13-0.0318%31 May →
inferno13–100.0410%30 May →
inferno13–90.0720%30 May →
cache13–80.0328%29 May →
inferno13–80.0317%28 May →
mirage13–7-0.0320%28 May →
dust26–130.0016%27 May →
nuke9–130.0413%27 May →
cache13–70.0223%27 May →
dust28–13-0.1014%27 May →
vertigo8–10.0435%27 May →
mirage13–40.0017%27 May →
cache13–90.0515%27 May →
anubis13–80.0215%26 May →
nuke8–13-0.0311%26 May →
nuke8–130.0125%23 May →
dust213–100.0417%23 May →
vertigo13–70.0214%23 May →
cache12–12-0.0218%23 May →
nuke13–70.0325%23 May →
dust26–13-0.0230%22 May →
nuke13–60.0319%22 May →
inferno15–15-0.0212%21 May →
nuke10–13-0.0114%21 May →
anubis13–30.0919%21 May →
overpass13–11-0.0117%20 May →
mirage14–160.0224%20 May →
inferno3–13-0.0427%20 May →
anubis13–100.0715%20 May →
dust211–13-0.0222%20 May →
vertigo13–90.0520%20 May →
inferno6–130.028%19 May →
cache9–130.0027%19 May →
overpass13–70.0314%19 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.