Alexander Von Burmese Hoover

Alexander Von Burmese Hoover — CS2 Stats

WF76561198156727814[U:1:196462086]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,244Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,849Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Oct 2026 (26 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,380 → 2,380
+4Tracked matches · now 1,244
−6.9ppWin rate · 65.5% → 58.6%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,127 -2,621 7 Mar – 18 Jun · 7 days played
18,69721,748peak 21,7487 Mar18 Jun
Faceit ELO: 2,380 +0 1 Sept – 27 Oct · 8 observations
2,3802,380peak 2,3801 Sept27 Oct
21,748Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,380Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2026-02-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,380
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 120 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches70—
Win rate43%——
K/D0.981.08—
Headshot %43%71%—

Measured 26 Sep 2026 → 27 Oct 2026; previous 1 Sep 2026 → 26 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAlexander Von Burmese Hoo…30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,380csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning64
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60–38–2Last 10060%Win rateLLWWLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −3.7pp headshot accuracy · −48ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 640ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 664ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility4.2
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels6.1
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 649ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning6.4
Utility4.2
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels5.4
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time648ms−12ms
first ⅓ avg 661ms → last ⅓ avg 648ms
Headshot accuracy21.3%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 21.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 9–7 · inferno, 14 Feb →
37%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · shelter, 9 Jul →
438msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · anubis, 26 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 18 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

wardenBest map · 100% over 5anubisWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB1910–953%0.02
anubisC145–936%0.01
ancientB137–654%0.01
cacheS1311–285%0.02
nukeS96–367%0.03
mirageB84–450%-0.00
overpassC52–340%0.03
vertigoS54–180%0.04
wardenS55–0100%0.05
shelter—21–150%0.01
train—21–150%0.04
fachwerk—11–0100%-0.00
sanctum—10–10%-0.02
office—11–0100%0.05
stronghold—11–0100%-0.02
poseidon—11–0100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

115,627Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
5,252Matches
44.8%Match win rate
40.4%Headshot %
15.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
12,634MVPs
3,052Hours (in match)
6,093Bombs planted
1,788Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4733,942
AWP11,355
AUG3,278
Knife3,225
P2503,126
UMP-452,786

Lifetime map wins

6,519inferno
5,681train
5,429vertigo
4,326nuke
2,439dust2
2,175cbble
194office
183lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,574Matches
52%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
72.7ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient11853%1.1115.5
Anubis10047%1.0614.7
Vertigo4963%1.1315.8
Inferno4547%0.9814.3
Nuke3161%1.1716.7
Overpass2556%1.1218.5
Dust22532%0.9214.2
Mirage2040%0.9314.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
85.0%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
649msReaction time
49.9%T opening success
52.9%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
7.52HE damage / grenade
6.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–130.0321%26 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0513%26 Oct →
inferno13–90.0317%22 Oct →
anubis13–50.0425%22 Oct →
mirage17–190.0025%23 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0219%20 Jul →
inferno13–50.0214%15 Jul →
shelter8–130.0428%13 Jul →
inferno13–40.0319%13 Jul →
fachwerk13–7-0.0019%12 Jul →
shelter13–9-0.0337%9 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.0526%9 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0924%9 Jul →
nuke13–00.0324%18 Jun →
inferno13–50.0423%7 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.0719%7 Jun →
overpass11–130.0420%7 Jun →
ancient13–11-0.0119%7 Jun →
ancient13–80.0128%7 Jun →
inferno7–130.0517%4 Jun →
nuke10–130.0123%4 Jun →
anubis13–80.0818%26 May →
nuke8–130.0519%26 May →
vertigo13–70.0319%23 May →
cache12–120.0326%23 May →
anubis13–30.1118%21 May →
anubis11–130.0622%14 May →
train13–60.0420%13 May →
cache13–50.1028%13 May →
ancient1–13-0.0216%13 May →
ancient11–10.0719%13 May →
cache13–3-0.0226%13 May →
mirage13–11-0.0415%13 May →
vertigo13–6-0.0423%11 May →
cache13–80.0522%11 May →
mirage7–130.0426%11 May →
mirage8–130.0316%11 May →
cache9–13-0.0719%6 May →
anubis1–13-0.0935%6 May →
cache13–60.1429%5 May →
cache13–70.0324%5 May →
cache13–100.0822%4 May →
nuke10–13-0.0421%3 May →
ancient8–13-0.0429%29 Apr →
nuke13–110.0916%29 Apr →
inferno13–50.1420%28 Apr →
mirage6–13-0.0630%28 Apr →
cache13–7-0.0215%27 Apr →
cache13–90.0031%25 Apr →
ancient9–130.0319%25 Apr →
anubis15–190.0422%25 Apr →
cache13–11-0.1024%24 Apr →
inferno13–70.0517%23 Apr →
cache13–110.0226%23 Apr →
cache13–40.0214%23 Apr →
inferno8–13-0.0314%22 Apr →
nuke22–19-0.0117%19 Apr →
anubis13–7-0.0219%19 Apr →
ancient13–30.0813%19 Apr →
inferno6–13-0.0517%19 Apr →
ancient13–5-0.0316%18 Apr →
anubis15–190.0120%18 Apr →
inferno8–130.0620%16 Apr →
anubis13–8-0.0312%16 Apr →
overpass11–130.0516%13 Apr →
ancient10–13-0.0422%12 Apr →
inferno6–9-0.0226%7 Apr →
sanctum6–9-0.0232%7 Apr →
vertigo9–40.1324%7 Apr →
anubis5–13-0.0614%6 Apr →
overpass8–130.0517%16 Mar →
mirage13–110.0634%16 Mar →
anubis10–130.0411%15 Mar →
inferno5–13-0.0212%10 Mar →
overpass13–60.0314%7 Mar →
ancient13–11-0.0114%7 Mar →
inferno12–16-0.0314%5 Mar →
nuke13–11-0.0118%4 Mar →
overpass16–13-0.048%4 Mar →
inferno13–80.0137%1 Mar →
inferno13–6-0.0227%1 Mar →
nuke13–3-0.0013%1 Mar →
train11–130.0316%25 Feb →
warden13–60.0424%23 Feb →
warden13–90.1129%23 Feb →
inferno11–130.0315%22 Feb →
warden13–70.0729%19 Feb →
office13–40.0531%19 Feb →
warden13–8-0.0113%19 Feb →
vertigo12–12-0.0419%18 Feb →
mirage13–50.0228%18 Feb →
warden13–70.0630%18 Feb →
stronghold13–3-0.0226%16 Feb →
nuke13–110.1416%15 Feb →
anubis6–130.0317%15 Feb →
poseidon9–60.0933%14 Feb →
vertigo9–40.1234%14 Feb →
inferno9–70.1633%14 Feb →
ancient13–90.0816%12 Feb →
anubis7–130.0110%12 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.