matix

matix — CS2 Stats

RO76561198192316931[U:1:232051203]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,189Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,049Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,398Top 50% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#52089 of 261615 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,013 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,398 +2,278 1 Apr – 13 Nov · 34 days played
20,12025,000peak 25,0001 Apr13 Nov
Faceit ELO: 2,013 +0 1 Sept – 7 Sept · 3 observations
2,0132,013peak 2,0131 Sept7 Sept
25,106Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,013Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
47Days played since 2026-04-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,013
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 487 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,602 below peak (25,000)
  • -1,311 over 30 days · declining
  • -249 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,602 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,986), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate42.3%50.9%
Shot accuracy11.9%13.7%
Kill/death ratio0.961.09
Match win rate49.1%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmatixFACEITLevel 10 · 2,013 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER22,398 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,013csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning56
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–41–2Last 10057%Win rateLWLLWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +3.3pp headshot accuracy · +79ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 648ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 612ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility5.0
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 566ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.6
Utility5.0
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time559ms−71ms
first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%+3.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–1 · ancient, 4 Sept →
48%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · anubis, 4 May →
375msFastest reaction time · 0–3 · inferno, 1 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 4 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
11–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7mirageWeakest map · 43% over 30
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC3013–1743%0.00
infernoS2919–1066%0.02
ancientS1611–569%0.02
dust2A95–456%0.03
anubisS75–271%0.02
cacheC73–443%0.02
nuke—10–10%-0.02
overpass—11–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 30). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

85,960Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
3,998Matches
49.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 10 players
42.3%Headshot %
11.9%Shot accuracy
9,852MVPs
1,931Hours (in match)
4,870Bombs planted
1,238Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4733,257
AWP6,811
P902,043
Knife1,750
FAMAS1,566

Lifetime map wins

10,641inferno
4,348dust2
815nuke
576train
554cbble
542vertigo
90office
61ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

867Matches
52%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
82.9ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage22156%1.1416.0
Inferno15850%1.1116.5
Anubis10853%1.1317.4
Ancient10450%1.1316.4
Nuke743%1.2618.0
Dust2520%0.8710.8
Vertigo425%0.8614.3
Train333%0.8711.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.7%Spray accuracy
73.6%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
566msReaction time
38.9%T opening success
55.7%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
10.28HE damage / grenade
3.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.7296 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.8975% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 30 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis9–130.0218%13 Nov →
inferno13–9-0.0810%26 Oct →
cache5–130.0115%26 Oct →
mirage3–130.0223%23 Oct →
dust213–110.0725%23 Oct →
inferno13–30.0916%18 Oct →
mirage8–130.0319%18 Oct →
ancient13–30.0624%8 Oct →
dust26–130.0313%8 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0336%8 Oct →
ancient0–7-0.070%7 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0124%7 Oct →
cache13–90.0325%7 Oct →
inferno16–130.0313%1 Oct →
inferno0–30.0914%1 Oct →
inferno13–70.1119%5 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0219%5 Sept →
mirage13–80.0021%5 Sept →
inferno13–60.0713%4 Sept →
ancient13–10.1216%4 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0122%4 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0016%3 Sept →
inferno13–70.0224%3 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0730%3 Sept →
mirage13–80.0116%19 Aug →
inferno13–100.0432%19 Aug →
mirage14–160.0424%13 Aug →
mirage11–130.0222%13 Aug →
inferno13–70.0714%12 Aug →
ancient13–20.0514%12 Aug →
inferno9–130.0215%12 Aug →
inferno13–100.0613%8 Aug →
anubis8–130.0619%8 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0527%8 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0810%2 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0221%29 Jul →
inferno16–140.0114%29 Jul →
anubis13–10-0.0512%22 Jul →
cache13–4-0.0019%22 Jul →
mirage13–20.0930%22 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0218%19 Jul →
inferno13–40.1218%19 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0835%8 Jul →
dust211–130.0626%8 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0226%8 Jul →
dust213–20.0431%4 Jul →
mirage10–130.0228%4 Jul →
inferno9–130.0818%27 Jun →
mirage15–150.0217%27 Jun →
dust213–7-0.0322%27 Jun →
mirage13–100.0124%26 Jun →
mirage6–13-0.0714%26 Jun →
mirage10–130.0316%26 Jun →
inferno6–13-0.0224%25 Jun →
mirage13–9-0.0416%25 Jun →
anubis13–6-0.0516%18 Jun →
mirage5–13-0.0214%18 Jun →
inferno13–90.0324%18 Jun →
ancient13–11-0.0215%11 Jun →
inferno13–100.0729%10 Jun →
ancient13–80.0319%10 Jun →
mirage13–90.0613%10 Jun →
ancient13–60.0123%5 Jun →
dust213–100.0328%25 May →
overpass13–8-0.0118%22 May →
ancient6–13-0.0723%22 May →
inferno5–13-0.0215%21 May →
cache3–130.0119%16 May →
dust214–160.0510%16 May →
mirage3–13-0.0411%16 May →
ancient7–13-0.0213%16 May →
inferno13–10-0.017%16 May →
cache12–12-0.0120%16 May →
cache4–130.0418%13 May →
mirage5–13-0.0414%13 May →
ancient13–110.0418%12 May →
inferno13–60.039%11 May →
inferno7–13-0.0210%10 May →
cache13–110.0311%9 May →
inferno13–90.0219%9 May →
ancient10–130.0814%9 May →
anubis13–20.1048%4 May →
mirage13–00.0119%4 May →
mirage13–80.0817%29 Apr →
mirage13–80.0911%27 Apr →
inferno13–80.0514%27 Apr →
inferno16–140.0213%24 Apr →
anubis13–40.0919%24 Apr →
mirage13–11-0.0213%24 Apr →
ancient13–40.0716%24 Apr →
mirage13–9-0.0213%20 Apr →
inferno8–130.026%19 Apr →
ancient16–140.0211%19 Apr →
ancient13–60.0913%10 Apr →
mirage13–110.0518%10 Apr →
inferno7–13-0.0825%9 Apr →
dust213–100.0527%8 Apr →
mirage5–13-0.0119%2 Apr →
inferno22–20-0.028%1 Apr →
anubis13–9-0.0427%1 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.