v00gzy

v00gzy — CS2 Stats

EE76561198184856259[U:1:224590531]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,474Tracked matches55%Win rate2021Tracked since
4,306Hours in CS59Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,732Top 50% of 208,919 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#71972 of 256149 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,805 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,732 +4,257 31 Aug – 22 Oct · 28 days played
16,47523,423peak 23,42331 Aug22 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,805 +0 31 Aug – 22 Oct · 5 observations
1,8051,805peak 1,80531 Aug22 Oct
23,643Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,805Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-08-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,805
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 196 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,691 below peak (23,423)
  • +732 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,268 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-22
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches136——
Win rate51%——
K/D1.06——
Headshot %56%——

Measured 22 Sep 2026 → 22 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,126), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate64.5%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy6.5%13.0%13.2%6.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.111.061.07above
Match win rate47.3%46.3%46.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGv00gzyFACEITLevel 8 · 1,805 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,732 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,805csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning52
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–44–2Last 10054%Win rateWWLLWWWWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −4.3pp headshot accuracy · −66ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 483ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility5.9
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.2
Utility5.9
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time538ms+3ms
first ⅓ avg 535ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms
Headshot accuracy24.5%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 22.3% → last ⅓ avg 24.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–4 · nuke, 17 Oct →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · train, 17 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · nuke, 20 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 7 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
4–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 73% over 11dust2Weakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2010–1050%0.03
cacheB147–750%0.01
dust2C146–843%0.03
nukeA138–562%0.01
mirageB136–746%0.01
anubisB126–650%0.01
ancientS118–373%0.03
train—22–0100%0.08
vertigo—11–0100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

149,794Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
4,919Matches
47.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
64.5%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 8 players
6.5%Shot accuracy
11,413MVPs
3,289Hours (in match)
6,753Bombs planted
1,540Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4778,222
AWP15,890
MAC-101,367
P2501,344
MP91,127

Lifetime map wins

8,568inferno
7,780dust2
4,620nuke
2,079vertigo
1,499train
1,076cbble
431office
77assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

801Matches
51%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
80.5ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10943%1.0115.5
Anubis9960%1.2416.3
Dust28142%1.0615.9
Ancient7253%1.2817.0
Inferno6949%1.2015.8
Nuke5159%1.2116.4
Vertigo3658%1.2418.5
Cache2955%1.1718.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.4%Headshot accuracy
36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.1%Spray accuracy
83.4%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
541msReaction time
27.2%T opening success
53.5%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
7.54HE damage / grenade
13.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.1747% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–11-0.0617%21 Oct →
inferno13–60.0831%21 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0920%20 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0037%20 Oct →
inferno13–90.0324%20 Oct →
vertigo13–50.0613%20 Oct →
mirage13–30.0526%19 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0226%19 Oct →
mirage15–150.0216%19 Oct →
anubis8–130.0121%19 Oct →
cache13–80.0625%19 Oct →
nuke9–130.0630%18 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0718%18 Oct →
train13–90.1141%17 Oct →
ancient13–60.1027%17 Oct →
nuke13–40.1327%17 Oct →
inferno8–130.0325%17 Oct →
dust26–130.0435%17 Oct →
dust25–130.0527%17 Oct →
anubis13–100.0420%17 Oct →
cache13–100.0229%17 Oct →
nuke13–70.0513%17 Oct →
inferno11–130.0231%16 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0327%16 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0618%16 Oct →
ancient13–90.0322%16 Oct →
anubis5–130.0422%16 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.048%16 Oct →
ancient13–60.0235%16 Oct →
dust28–130.0731%15 Oct →
mirage13–90.0330%15 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0223%15 Oct →
anubis9–130.0617%15 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0122%15 Oct →
inferno13–30.0623%15 Oct →
inferno11–130.0620%14 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0316%14 Oct →
mirage8–130.0430%14 Oct →
anubis13–90.0514%13 Oct →
dust210–130.0029%13 Oct →
train13–80.0634%13 Oct →
cache8–130.0626%13 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0414%12 Oct →
ancient11–130.0224%12 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0331%12 Oct →
mirage13–50.058%12 Oct →
anubis13–4-0.0125%12 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0326%11 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0126%11 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0419%11 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0215%10 Oct →
cache14–16-0.0128%10 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.0613%10 Oct →
inferno13–60.0523%9 Oct →
mirage13–60.0617%9 Oct →
ancient13–100.0419%9 Oct →
cache13–4-0.0016%8 Oct →
nuke13–30.0524%8 Oct →
dust214–160.0420%8 Oct →
inferno15–150.0327%8 Oct →
nuke14–13-0.0325%8 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0315%7 Oct →
ancient13–80.0728%7 Oct →
nuke7–130.0230%7 Oct →
cache13–20.1039%7 Oct →
ancient13–100.0127%7 Oct →
inferno11–130.0711%6 Oct →
inferno8–130.0010%6 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0129%5 Oct →
inferno13–80.0622%5 Oct →
anubis13–40.0423%4 Oct →
dust213–100.0825%4 Oct →
inferno13–20.0620%4 Oct →
dust26–130.0822%3 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0133%3 Oct →
nuke10–130.0328%3 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0014%3 Oct →
inferno13–60.0426%3 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0223%3 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0119%3 Oct →
mirage13–80.0520%2 Oct →
nuke13–100.0324%2 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0126%2 Oct →
nuke13–90.0315%2 Oct →
cache13–110.0816%2 Oct →
anubis13–90.0919%2 Oct →
inferno13–60.0524%2 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0524%2 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0029%2 Oct →
inferno13–30.0519%1 Oct →
mirage13–30.0730%1 Oct →
ancient13–110.0721%1 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0313%1 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0431%1 Oct →
dust213–100.0220%30 Sept →
dust213–30.0426%30 Sept →
dust213–70.0131%30 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0513%28 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0134%28 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.048%27 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.