v00gzy — CS2 Stats

EE76561198184856259[U:1:224590531]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,222Tracked matches37%Win rate2021Tracked since

4,093Hours in CS95Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating16,475Purple band · top ~22.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#32434 of 59494 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,805 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

16,475Peak Premier on CSDB

1,805Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-31

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,805
Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 196 to go
Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31
Level 8 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 16,475
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,525 to go
Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Purple band first seen 2026-08-31
Blue band first seen 2026-08-31

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=3,003), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 8 median	Level 9 median	vs Level 9
Headshot rate	64.7%	47.0%	48.4%	above
Shot accuracy	6.8%	12.8%	13.2%	6.4% short
Kill/death ratio	1.11	1.07	1.08	above
Match win rate	47.0%	46.4%	47.0%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87

Positioning52

Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–48–2Last 10050%Win rateWLLLWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.7

Aggression6.4

Utility5.9

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels1.9

Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7

Positioning5.2

Utility5.9

Mechanics7.7

Opening Duels1.9

Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time560ms+10ms

first ⅓ avg 550ms → last ⅓ avg 560ms

Headshot accuracy28.7%+5.3%

first ⅓ avg 23.4% → last ⅓ avg 28.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — inferno 15–15

13–2Biggest win — cache

5Longest win streak

5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 12cacheWeakest map · 29% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	A	17	10–7	59%	0.02
dust2	C	15	6–9	40%	0.02
cache	D	14	4–10	29%	0.02
nuke	B	14	7–7	50%	0.01
anubis	S	12	9–3	75%	0.03
mirage	B	11	5–6	45%	0.02
ancient	A	11	6–5	55%	0.01
vertigo	B	6	3–3	50%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

143,599Lifetime kills

1.11K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players

4,676Matches

47.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players

64.7%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 8 players

6.8%Shot accuracy

10,799MVPs

3,150Hours (in match)

6,400Bombs planted

1,464Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4775,079

M4A4 / M4A1-S18,384

AWP15,431

Desert Eagle9,337

P2000 / USP-S7,367

Glock-183,431

Galil AR2,035

P2501,312

MAC-101,282

MP91,076

Lifetime map wins

8,020inferno

7,419dust2

4,248nuke

2,065vertigo

1,473train

1,076cbble

414office

77assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

714Matches

52%Win rate

1.17Avg K/D

80.0ADR

55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	94	44%	1.01	15.6
Anubis	80	64%	1.26	16.4
Dust2	68	38%	1.04	15.9
Ancient	62	53%	1.28	16.6
Inferno	56	50%	1.13	15.3
Nuke	45	60%	1.22	16.1
Vertigo	35	57%	1.20	18.5
Cache	19	63%	1.27	18.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.4%Headshot accuracy

36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.0%Spray accuracy

84.7%Counter-strafing

9.1°Preaim

556msReaction time

29.6%T opening success

45.6%CT opening success

0.58Enemies flashed / flash

3.2%Flash assists

5.46HE damage / grenade

16.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.6293% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–5	0.04	34%	30 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.02	28%	30 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.02	33%	30 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.01	24%	29 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.02	28%	29 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.02	31%	29 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.07	18%	29 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	30%	29 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.08	25%	29 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.03	32%	29 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	17%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.10	34%	29 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.02	28%	29 Aug →
ancient	13–3	-0.02	44%	29 Aug →
inferno	22–19	-0.01	31%	28 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.00	37%	28 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	39%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.06	14%	28 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.03	42%	28 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.02	32%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.10	21%	27 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.02	30%	27 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.03	14%	27 Aug →
nuke	5–13	0.01	28%	25 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.00	27%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–16	0.02	24%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.05	30%	25 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.09	28%	24 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.06	27%	24 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.05	24%	24 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.13	38%	23 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.00	27%	23 Aug →
dust2	2–13	0.06	26%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.01	25%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.03	18%	23 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.04	19%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.01	25%	23 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	21%	23 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.03	24%	22 Aug →
vertigo	13–9	0.02	24%	22 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	18%	22 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.04	14%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.04	16%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.02	40%	22 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	30%	22 Aug →
vertigo	0–13	-0.00	26%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.13	31%	22 Aug →
inferno	19–16	0.03	21%	21 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.02	18%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.04	16%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.04	28%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.02	30%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.02	31%	20 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.07	23%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.07	13%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.04	23%	20 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.02	28%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.06	23%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.05	28%	19 Aug →
cache	16–12	0.03	30%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.03	21%	19 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	24%	18 Aug →
vertigo	13–5	0.00	32%	18 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.02	18%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.02	15%	18 Aug →
vertigo	13–10	0.07	23%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.03	27%	17 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.05	16%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.06	21%	16 Aug →
ancient	16–12	-0.02	19%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–4	-0.04	21%	16 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	43%	16 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	25%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.02	23%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.03	20%	16 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.03	22%	15 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.03	15%	15 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.06	16%	14 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	21%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.02	15%	14 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	24%	14 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.04	16%	12 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.04	29%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.09	30%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.05	20%	11 Aug →
vertigo	8–13	0.00	27%	11 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.01	31%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.02	19%	11 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.02	26%	10 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.01	25%	10 Aug →
mirage	16–12	0.01	26%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.05	21%	10 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.03	29%	9 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.07	19%	9 Aug →
vertigo	8–13	0.04	31%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.07	19%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.04	29%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.03	25%	7 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	28%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.01	21%	5 Aug →