Vegan

Vegan — CS2 Stats

76561198084728060[U:1:124462332]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,049Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating22,668Top 50% of 44,590 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#13995 of 60553 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

22,668Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 22,668
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,332 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGVeganFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,668 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning48
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48466Last 10048%Win rateLWWLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim5.7
Aggression6.2
Utility5.4
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch10.0

Reliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning4.8
Utility5.4
Mechanics4.1
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time560ms−68ms
first ⅓ avg 628ms → last ⅓ avg 560ms
Headshot accuracy16.4%−3.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — inferno 13–4
133Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 11mirageWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA1911858%0.03
cacheC1881044%0.03
anubisB126650%0.03
ancientA117464%0.01
nukeB105550%0.02
dust2B105550%0.01
mirageD92722%-0.00
overpass42250%-0.02
train31233%-0.02
vertigo2020%0.00
office1010%-0.03
poseidon110100%0.14

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

165Matches
58%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
90.3ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis580%1.0313.8
Overpass450%1.3921.0
Ancient367%1.0218.7
Mirage367%1.0413.7
Vertigo250%0.7512.5
Inferno1100%0.8612.0
Nuke1100%1.0716.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
68.7%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
563msReaction time
34.6%T opening success
40.3%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
10.13HE damage / grenade
6.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.5791% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache9–130.0313%27 Aug
nuke13–50.0318%27 Aug
inferno13–80.1223%27 Aug
nuke5–130.0816%25 Aug
cache10–130.049%25 Aug
dust28–13-0.0223%24 Aug
mirage11–130.0414%24 Aug
cache9–13-0.0419%24 Aug
ancient13–60.0414%24 Aug
nuke16–140.0016%24 Aug
anubis13–80.0512%20 Aug
dust213–70.0119%19 Aug
cache16–120.0715%19 Aug
inferno13–40.1619%19 Aug
ancient10–130.017%12 Aug
cache6–13-0.0510%12 Aug
anubis13–70.0015%12 Aug
cache15–150.0519%10 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0119%3 Aug
inferno16–12-0.0019%2 Aug
dust213–11-0.0113%29 Jul
inferno13–90.0814%29 Jul
mirage5–130.0329%29 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0717%27 Jul
anubis8–130.0312%27 Jul
dust213–30.0813%27 Jul
ancient5–130.0316%24 Jul
cache7–130.0218%24 Jul
nuke15–150.0916%24 Jul
cache13–110.0714%24 Jul
ancient13–70.0417%23 Jul
cache13–80.0324%23 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0118%22 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0216%22 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0325%22 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0336%21 Jul
inferno13–70.0318%21 Jul
nuke13–16-0.009%21 Jul
dust213–110.0020%20 Jul
cache13–110.0017%20 Jul
inferno13–110.0324%20 Jul
ancient13–40.0117%20 Jul
inferno11–130.0015%20 Jul
dust213–80.0522%20 Jul
cache11–13-0.0016%20 Jul
ancient13–50.0328%25 Jun
cache13–40.1325%25 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0126%25 Jun
anubis13–60.1329%17 Jun
train2–13-0.0423%17 Jun
train13–50.0228%17 Jun
inferno8–130.0325%17 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0933%17 Jun
train4–13-0.0322%17 Jun
ancient12–120.0316%11 Jun
dust29–130.0131%11 Jun
office3–13-0.0322%11 Jun
anubis4–130.0126%8 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0121%4 Jun
vertigo12–120.0213%4 Jun
vertigo8–13-0.0119%4 Jun
inferno13–90.0520%28 May
anubis7–13-0.0618%28 May
anubis13–10-0.0211%26 May
ancient13–4-0.0318%26 May
mirage7–130.0113%22 May
anubis13–60.1224%22 May
nuke16–120.0220%21 May
cache8–10.0317%16 May
inferno13–70.0322%9 May
nuke13–80.1022%8 May
dust23–130.0323%8 May
cache13–50.0525%8 May
anubis11–130.0525%4 May
inferno13–50.0022%4 May
anubis10–13-0.0619%3 May
nuke13–7-0.0110%3 May
cache5–130.0826%30 Apr
mirage15–150.0214%30 Apr
overpass13–9-0.0113%30 Apr
inferno6–13-0.036%30 Apr
dust25–13-0.0614%30 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0918%30 Apr
ancient13–80.0130%30 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0023%29 Apr
cache3–13-0.0625%29 Apr
cache13–110.0325%29 Apr
cache12–12-0.0017%29 Apr
inferno13–70.0513%8 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0621%4 Apr
ancient16–120.0121%4 Apr
inferno13–50.1323%4 Apr
overpass13–10-0.0124%4 Apr
poseidon9–30.1429%4 Apr
overpass4–13-0.0713%4 Apr
dust23–13-0.0335%4 Apr
overpass6–130.0114%3 Apr
anubis13–60.0923%3 Apr
inferno7–130.0010%2 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0310%2 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →