Zarif

Zarif — CS2 Stats

EE76561198014617854[U:1:54352126]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,186Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,578Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating21,320Top 50% of 208,919 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#64649 of 256147 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,612 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,320 +623 31 Aug – 21 Oct · 28 days played
19,42822,019peak 22,01931 Aug21 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,612 +0 31 Aug – 27 Sept · 6 observations
1,6121,612peak 1,61231 Aug27 Sept
22,308Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,612Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
28Days played since 2026-08-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,612
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 139 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 699 below peak (22,019)
  • +1,892 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,680 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches138——
Win rate50%——
K/D0.88——
Headshot %59%——

Measured 20 Sep 2026 → 22 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,654), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate51.7%48.2%50.9%meets
Shot accuracy10.5%13.2%13.7%3.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.871.071.090.22 short
Match win rate46.6%46.9%48.4%1.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZarifFACEITLevel 9 · 1,612 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,320 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,612csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning59
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT58–37–5Last 10058%Win rateLWWTWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +3.7pp headshot accuracy · −43ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 10

  • 7–2–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 540ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility6.1
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 59% on T to 39% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.9
Utility6.1
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time542ms+20ms
first ⅓ avg 522ms → last ⅓ avg 542ms
Headshot accuracy18.3%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–2 · cache, 18 Oct →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · mirage, 1 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · cache, 15 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 18 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
6–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 78% over 9mirageWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2314–961%0.03
dust2B168–850%0.01
cacheS1612–475%0.06
mirageC135–838%0.02
anubisC125–742%0.04
nukeS97–278%0.02
ancientS96–367%0.02
vertigo—11–0100%0.05
office—10–10%0.14

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

203,605Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
10,613Matches
46.6%Match win rate
51.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
10.5%Shot accuracy
23,396MVPs
5,578Hours (in match)
14,344Bombs planted
2,674Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4772,573
AWP12,262
MP96,156
MAC-105,317
P2504,686
Tec-94,615

Lifetime map wins

38,570inferno
10,964dust2
10,132nuke
4,932vertigo
3,981train
2,565office
821cbble
383lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

752Matches
53%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
76.6ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10048%0.8312.4
Anubis8858%1.0114.3
Dust26949%1.0214.4
Inferno6261%1.2817.3
Ancient4856%0.9413.3
Nuke4753%0.9614.3
Cache2857%1.0716.5
Vertigo2255%0.9814.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
85.8%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
543msReaction time
58.8%T opening success
38.8%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
8.29HE damage / grenade
14.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.8275% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis12–160.0522%21 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0319%20 Oct →
vertigo13–50.0518%20 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0118%20 Oct →
nuke13–90.1023%20 Oct →
anubis8–130.0025%19 Oct →
cache13–80.0224%19 Oct →
cache13–20.2033%18 Oct →
dust216–140.0727%18 Oct →
inferno13–30.0513%18 Oct →
dust26–130.0322%17 Oct →
dust25–13-0.049%17 Oct →
anubis13–100.0416%17 Oct →
cache13–100.0914%17 Oct →
nuke13–70.0121%17 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0020%17 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0318%16 Oct →
nuke13–100.1022%16 Oct →
mirage4–130.0830%16 Oct →
ancient13–90.0411%16 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0413%16 Oct →
anubis9–130.0021%16 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0014%16 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0121%16 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0610%15 Oct →
mirage13–90.0510%15 Oct →
cache7–130.0112%15 Oct →
anubis9–130.0114%15 Oct →
cache13–50.0815%15 Oct →
inferno13–3-0.0025%15 Oct →
inferno9–130.0815%14 Oct →
inferno9–130.0419%12 Oct →
ancient11–130.0111%12 Oct →
inferno2–130.0015%12 Oct →
mirage13–50.0518%12 Oct →
dust214–160.0215%11 Oct →
ancient13–60.0319%10 Oct →
inferno13–60.0225%9 Oct →
mirage13–60.0014%9 Oct →
dust216–12-0.0019%9 Oct →
cache13–40.1225%8 Oct →
dust213–100.0118%8 Oct →
inferno15–150.0518%8 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0816%7 Oct →
ancient13–80.0031%7 Oct →
cache13–20.0428%7 Oct →
ancient13–100.0211%7 Oct →
dust213–100.0314%6 Oct →
nuke11–130.0221%5 Oct →
inferno13–80.0221%5 Oct →
inferno11–130.0117%5 Oct →
cache15–150.0223%4 Oct →
cache13–50.1511%4 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0526%3 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0119%3 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0314%3 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0129%3 Oct →
inferno13–60.078%3 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.046%3 Oct →
inferno13–90.1625%3 Oct →
inferno13–4-0.0122%3 Oct →
nuke13–110.0021%3 Oct →
mirage13–80.0719%2 Oct →
cache13–50.0620%2 Oct →
cache13–110.0317%2 Oct →
anubis13–90.0422%2 Oct →
inferno13–60.0029%2 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.057%2 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0120%2 Oct →
inferno13–30.1723%1 Oct →
mirage13–30.0240%1 Oct →
ancient13–110.1014%1 Oct →
anubis10–130.0723%1 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0233%1 Oct →
cache13–100.0115%30 Sept →
mirage11–130.0717%30 Sept →
nuke13–90.0114%30 Sept →
inferno13–60.0819%30 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.038%29 Sept →
dust213–40.0620%29 Sept →
dust213–110.0725%28 Sept →
mirage15–150.0916%28 Sept →
inferno13–100.0915%28 Sept →
dust213–30.0325%28 Sept →
anubis13–160.0511%27 Sept →
dust29–130.0116%27 Sept →
mirage2–130.0224%27 Sept →
cache13–60.0332%25 Sept →
office4–130.1428%25 Sept →
ancient6–130.0017%25 Sept →
inferno10–130.016%25 Sept →
anubis13–40.1316%25 Sept →
inferno13–100.0322%24 Sept →
cache13–40.0517%24 Sept →
inferno15–150.0012%24 Sept →
anubis13–80.0227%23 Sept →
inferno13–110.028%23 Sept →
mirage5–130.0121%22 Sept →
anubis13–50.1616%22 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0230%22 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.