Nodnix

Nodnix — CS2 Stats

76561198176095019[U:1:215829291]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,983Tracked matches47%Win rate2023Tracked since
3,031Hours in CS35Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,934Top 10% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14437 of 261541 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,884 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,934 +934 13 Jul – 13 Nov · 29 days played
24,38026,354peak 26,35413 Jul13 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,884 +0 30 Aug – 26 Sept · 6 observations
1,8841,884peak 1,88430 Aug26 Sept
26,544Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,884Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-07-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,884
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 117 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 420 below peak (26,354)
  • -283 over 30 days · steady
  • +820 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,066 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate39.0%48.2%50.9%11.9% short
Shot accuracy10.1%13.2%13.7%3.6% short
Kill/death ratio1.231.071.09above
Match win rate44.1%46.9%48.4%4.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNodnixFACEITLevel 9 · 1,884 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER25,934 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,884csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning66
Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–54–1Last 10045%Win rateLWWLWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · +54ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility7.5
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch3.4

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 61% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 61% on T to 45% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning6.6
Utility7.5
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels5.7
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time533ms−9ms
first ⅓ avg 542ms → last ⅓ avg 533ms
Headshot accuracy19.4%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 21.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–8 · anubis, 25 Sept →
49%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · cache, 28 Jul →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · inferno, 24 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 24 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
10–15In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 68% over 19nukeWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS1913–668%0.03
mirageC156–940%0.00
ancientB157–847%0.01
dust2B157–847%0.02
cacheD154–1127%0.01
anubisB147–750%0.01
nukeD60–60%-0.01
vertigo—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

101,679Lifetime kills
1.23K/D · Top 25% of Level 9 players
4,693Matches
44.1%Match win rate
39.0%Headshot %
10.1%Shot accuracy
11,472MVPs
1,656Hours (in match)
3,328Bombs planted
990Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4732,419
AWP15,787
P903,508
FAMAS2,965
MAC-102,358

Lifetime map wins

9,617dust2
5,649inferno
1,754nuke
1,034train
188vertigo
165lake
145cbble
66bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

360Matches
56%Win rate
1.29Avg K/D
91.3ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust27850%1.2718.0
Mirage7747%1.1717.8
Inferno6475%1.4418.9
Anubis4556%1.2619.0
Ancient3850%1.3219.1
Cache2752%1.3120.5
Nuke1974%1.4319.6
Vertigo667%0.8613.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.2%Spray accuracy
76.6%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
537msReaction time
60.8%T opening success
45.0%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
9.6%Flash assists
10.64HE damage / grenade
13.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–13-0.0110%13 Nov →
inferno5–00.0520%13 Nov →
inferno13–80.0532%11 Nov →
anubis10–13-0.0411%11 Nov →
inferno13–80.0620%11 Nov →
ancient7–13-0.0522%11 Nov →
inferno20–220.0717%8 Nov →
nuke11–13-0.0312%2 Nov →
ancient0–13-0.0717%31 Oct →
inferno13–80.0522%30 Oct →
mirage9–130.0213%29 Oct →
dust29–130.1015%27 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0410%27 Oct →
inferno13–110.0831%27 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0224%26 Oct →
cache16–120.0218%25 Oct →
dust213–110.0519%25 Oct →
inferno13–20.0519%24 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0619%24 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0416%24 Oct →
ancient13–70.1418%24 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0430%24 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0430%24 Oct →
cache13–70.0117%24 Oct →
cache14–160.0523%23 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0126%23 Oct →
dust213–16-0.0013%22 Oct →
mirage14–160.0718%22 Oct →
nuke5–130.0116%22 Oct →
inferno13–110.0325%21 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0332%21 Oct →
inferno13–110.0710%14 Oct →
dust213–20.0917%12 Oct →
ancient13–100.0117%12 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0020%11 Oct →
inferno13–30.1221%11 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0219%8 Oct →
cache14–160.0518%6 Oct →
anubis11–130.0724%6 Oct →
cache10–130.0516%6 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0119%5 Oct →
cache13–70.0725%5 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.009%27 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0323%26 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0510%26 Sept →
anubis13–50.0118%26 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0220%25 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0412%25 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0125%25 Sept →
anubis13–80.1616%25 Sept →
dust26–130.0116%20 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0215%18 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0217%18 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0140%18 Sept →
ancient2–5-0.0520%10 Sept →
mirage16–12-0.0317%10 Sept →
inferno13–100.029%9 Sept →
mirage13–110.0314%9 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0321%9 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0221%1 Sept →
anubis13–70.0813%1 Sept →
mirage9–130.0412%24 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0218%21 Aug →
ancient13–100.0315%16 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0319%16 Aug →
vertigo13–90.0114%16 Aug →
mirage5–130.0128%15 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0412%15 Aug →
ancient8–130.0616%15 Aug →
ancient13–90.1224%15 Aug →
dust213–90.0225%15 Aug →
inferno10–130.0010%15 Aug →
anubis4–130.0223%14 Aug →
ancient16–140.0117%14 Aug →
anubis13–160.0112%13 Aug →
anubis16–13-0.028%6 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0516%4 Aug →
anubis8–130.0213%2 Aug →
dust214–160.0321%31 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0525%31 Jul →
mirage13–60.0814%31 Jul →
inferno12–8-0.0230%30 Jul →
inferno13–70.0322%29 Jul →
mirage15–150.0522%29 Jul →
dust213–110.0315%28 Jul →
cache1–13-0.0225%28 Jul →
nuke2–13-0.0227%28 Jul →
dust213–110.0530%28 Jul →
cache8–130.0649%28 Jul →
mirage0–13-0.0822%28 Jul →
ancient16–140.0128%28 Jul →
ancient12–16-0.0620%27 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0526%27 Jul →
nuke8–130.0225%27 Jul →
cache3–5-0.0133%27 Jul →
cache9–130.0929%16 Jul →
nuke10–130.0212%16 Jul →
dust213–60.0923%15 Jul →
anubis13–9-0.019%15 Jul →
ancient8–130.0126%13 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.