DacS ツ

DacS ツ — CS2 Stats

US76561198175815589[U:1:215549861]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,989Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
8,330Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,756 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (28 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,756 → 2,756
+4Tracked matches · now 3,989
0.0ppWin rate · 40.0% → 40.0%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 2,756 +0 4 Sept – 19 Sept · 2 observations
2,7562,756peak 2,7564 Sept19 Sept
2,756Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
69Days played since 2025-07-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,756
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 244 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches20——
Win rate40%——
K/D1.52——
Headshot %79%——

Measured 19 Sep 2026 → 17 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,061), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate61.0%50.9%
Shot accuracy16.1%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.281.09
Match win rate53.1%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDacS ツFACEITLevel 10 · 2,756 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,756csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning63
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–42Last 10058%Win rateWLLWWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · −6ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 540ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility5.9
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning6.3
Utility5.9
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time569ms−21ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy20.9%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 20.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 14 Aug →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · anubis, 4 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · ancient, 20 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 4 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

12Longest win streak
14–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 69% over 13anubisWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2112–957%0.01
mirageA1912–763%-0.01
ancientB189–950%0.02
infernoS139–469%0.03
nukeA117–464%0.03
anubisC73–443%-0.01
cache—42–250%0.03
overpass—43–175%0.02
train—20–20%-0.01
vertigo—11–0100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

339,793Lifetime kills
1.28K/D · Top 25% of Level 10 players
6,915Matches
53.1%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 10 players
61.0%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 10 players
16.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 10 players
27,677MVPs
6,763Hours (in match)
15,457Bombs planted
3,408Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47167,382
AWP13,335
Glock-1811,298
MP95,214
Knife5,150
SG 5533,805

Lifetime map wins

22,961inferno
12,209dust2
9,018vertigo
5,995nuke
2,720train
967cbble
439lake
66office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,865Matches
55%Win rate
1.38Avg K/D
80.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient27556%1.2916.6
Inferno17858%1.2616.2
Mirage15950%1.1816.7
Dust215751%1.1816.6
Anubis15158%1.1816.3
Vertigo11261%1.3017.0
Nuke7657%1.3417.0
Overpass4558%1.1816.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
76.4%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
554msReaction time
21.8%T opening success
41.4%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
10.7%Flash assists
11.98HE damage / grenade
8.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4933 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.8116% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–110.0526%14 Sept →
cache11–130.0616%11 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0612%5 Sept →
anubis13–00.0840%4 Sept →
mirage13–80.0117%4 Sept →
inferno14–160.0226%21 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0414%21 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0034%20 Aug →
ancient13–100.0333%20 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0519%19 Aug →
inferno16–120.0421%19 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.0213%18 Aug →
anubis17–19-0.0625%17 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0320%15 Aug →
nuke13–70.0624%13 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0122%7 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0113%7 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0333%6 Aug →
ancient11–130.0825%28 Jul →
ancient13–20.0524%28 Jul →
dust214–160.0221%24 Jul →
ancient12–160.0817%24 Jul →
anubis13–3-0.0217%22 Jul →
ancient13–160.0319%18 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0523%18 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0422%14 Jul →
dust213–2-0.033%14 Jul →
cache11–13-0.0020%12 Jul →
mirage16–130.0515%10 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0713%9 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0123%29 Jun →
mirage5–13-0.0520%27 Jun →
cache13–6-0.0318%27 Jun →
inferno13–110.0427%13 Jun →
cache13–20.1027%27 May →
ancient6–13-0.0019%12 Apr →
mirage13–80.0518%8 Apr →
dust27–130.0224%8 Apr →
ancient14–16-0.0521%1 Mar →
nuke13–50.0833%7 Feb →
mirage13–11-0.0414%7 Feb →
mirage13–11-0.0619%3 Jan →
inferno13–9-0.0312%14 Dec →
ancient6–13-0.0132%14 Dec →
dust29–13-0.0710%13 Dec →
mirage13–20.0211%9 Nov →
mirage13–11-0.0020%5 Nov →
train16–19-0.0614%26 Oct →
nuke25–230.0719%25 Oct →
mirage13–90.0217%24 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0116%22 Oct →
ancient13–60.0733%15 Oct →
dust213–110.0214%12 Oct →
mirage7–130.0026%12 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0316%12 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0316%28 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0531%28 Sept →
mirage13–100.037%27 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.0022%23 Sept →
dust213–30.0821%13 Sept →
ancient13–80.0312%12 Sept →
dust210–130.0414%4 Sept →
ancient13–110.0223%31 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0218%30 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.098%30 Aug →
vertigo9–10.0617%30 Aug →
inferno13–40.135%29 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0516%28 Aug →
nuke16–130.0115%28 Aug →
inferno5–130.0215%27 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0811%26 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0414%24 Aug →
overpass13–90.0324%24 Aug →
inferno13–60.0325%23 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0619%23 Aug →
dust213–40.0514%23 Aug →
dust225–230.0422%21 Aug →
inferno13–00.1220%14 Aug →
nuke13–20.2035%14 Aug →
ancient7–00.0812%14 Aug →
nuke13–90.0229%13 Aug →
dust213–20.0336%10 Aug →
dust213–90.0718%8 Aug →
inferno13–50.0622%6 Aug →
overpass13–80.0624%6 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0029%3 Aug →
overpass13–100.0216%1 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0225%31 Jul →
overpass5–13-0.0319%31 Jul →
dust213–10.0820%29 Jul →
inferno13–40.0316%29 Jul →
dust213–4-0.0115%27 Jul →
train11–130.0413%27 Jul →
dust213–110.0728%25 Jul →
nuke13–110.0524%25 Jul →
mirage9–130.0215%24 Jul →
dust27–130.0224%24 Jul →
ancient13–6-0.0115%24 Jul →
nuke13–16-0.0320%23 Jul →
ancient13–40.0516%22 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches12-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.