zBanss

zBanss — CS2 Stats

76561198803881281[U:1:843615553]Steam profile ↗

4,123Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,261 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGzBanssFACEITLevel 10 · 2,261 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning56
Utility80

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD5050Last 10050%Win rateLLWLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.5
Aggression6.7
Utility8.0
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.79 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 80 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.6
Utility8.0
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time542ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 560ms → last ⅓ avg 542ms
Headshot accuracy18.8%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — nuke 13–11
131Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
1214In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 70% over 10anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2081240%-0.00
infernoS2013765%-0.01
ancientC167944%-0.02
mirageB126650%-0.02
anubisD103730%-0.02
nukeS107370%0.02
cacheC52340%-0.03
overpass42250%-0.04
vertigo220100%0.07
office1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,079Matches
51%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
69.2ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient36756%1.0214.5
Inferno24955%1.0314.5
Anubis18343%1.0014.4
Mirage18046%0.8813.6
Dust217747%0.9514.1
Nuke15854%1.0113.8
Vertigo8957%1.1215.3
Overpass6854%0.9713.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
36.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.9%Spray accuracy
81.2%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
542msReaction time
31.2%T opening success
52.4%CT opening success
0.79Enemies flashed / flash
14.5%Flash assists
12.55HE damage / grenade
19.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.156% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis10–13-0.0519%26 Aug
cache9–13-0.0424%25 Aug
cache13–5-0.0222%25 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0318%21 Aug
anubis10–13-0.049%20 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0119%20 Aug
dust211–13-0.0324%19 Aug
anubis11–130.0018%19 Aug
inferno16–12-0.0019%19 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0213%18 Aug
anubis17–190.0113%17 Aug
dust26–13-0.0224%15 Aug
cache13–11-0.0519%14 Aug
nuke13–70.0115%13 Aug
dust28–13-0.0020%12 Aug
mirage13–11-0.048%10 Aug
dust216–120.0112%10 Aug
mirage10–130.0029%7 Aug
mirage13–100.0412%7 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0412%6 Aug
dust214–16-0.0019%5 Aug
dust213–110.0321%31 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0317%31 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0419%30 Jul
inferno11–13-0.027%29 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0814%28 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0822%26 Jul
cache6–13-0.0324%26 Jul
dust213–60.0631%26 Jul
inferno13–70.0123%26 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0320%17 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0113%15 Jul
ancient7–130.0239%11 Jul
mirage13–80.0421%9 Jul
dust213–1-0.0124%9 Jul
dust213–80.0412%4 Jul
inferno13–40.0519%20 Jun
inferno13–30.0927%19 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0313%14 Jun
dust27–13-0.0222%14 Jun
mirage3–13-0.084%14 Jun
dust214–16-0.049%13 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0831%13 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0311%6 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0419%2 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0643%30 May
ancient3–13-0.0643%30 May
inferno9–130.0011%30 May
overpass3–13-0.0622%30 May
nuke13–100.0117%20 May
overpass13–50.0514%19 May
inferno13–9-0.0129%18 May
ancient2–13-0.0514%18 May
dust213–5-0.0423%14 May
overpass13–8-0.0614%12 May
vertigo13–80.0422%3 May
cache11–13-0.0219%3 May
dust217–19-0.0117%29 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0317%28 Apr
inferno22–20-0.057%26 Apr
vertigo13–30.0929%21 Apr
nuke13–40.0922%13 Apr
mirage7–130.0213%13 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0022%12 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0513%10 Apr
ancient16–19-0.0310%9 Apr
dust213–5-0.0420%4 Apr
ancient13–90.0226%29 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0213%29 Mar
ancient13–50.0733%23 Mar
dust213–60.0518%17 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0821%10 Mar
nuke14–160.0612%25 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0520%20 Feb
inferno13–3-0.0018%20 Feb
inferno13–60.0218%18 Feb
nuke11–130.0228%18 Feb
overpass7–13-0.0721%14 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0317%14 Feb
inferno13–5-0.0423%12 Feb
dust23–13-0.0625%6 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0819%24 Jan
nuke13–11-0.0118%21 Jan
anubis13–100.0312%14 Jan
nuke13–60.0324%14 Jan
dust27–130.0431%4 Jan
mirage13–80.038%4 Jan
ancient13–9-0.013%4 Jan
inferno13–10-0.049%18 Dec
nuke13–110.1021%16 Dec
dust29–13-0.0024%13 Dec
ancient13–90.0421%11 Dec
dust29–13-0.0211%6 Dec
ancient16–120.0115%6 Dec
dust210–130.0116%5 Dec
inferno13–100.027%5 Dec
ancient13–11-0.025%5 Dec
mirage13–9-0.0315%29 Nov
office11–13-0.0312%23 Nov
inferno11–130.0021%21 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →