Judder

Judder — CS2 Stats

FI76561198174026405[U:1:213760677]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,950Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,337Hours in CS29Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating14,000Blue band · top ~33.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,000 -1,280 1 Sept – 4 Nov · 29 days played
11,93216,291peak 16,2911 Sept4 Nov
16,453Peak Premier in tracked matches
27Days played since 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,291 below peak (16,291)
  • -1,069 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,000 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate38.6%44.8%45.7%7.0% short
Shot accuracy15.3%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.071.031.05meets
Match win rate43.2%45.2%45.7%2.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJudderFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER14,000 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning53
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49–49–2Last 10049%Win rateLWWWLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +3.0pp headshot accuracy · +50ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility6.7
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 56% on T to 36% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 559ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning5.3
Utility6.7
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time565ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 580ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 7–13 · inferno, 8 Oct →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 4–0 · office, 24 Oct →
406msFastest reaction time · 4–0 · office, 24 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 3 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
3–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 61% over 23anubisWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2314–961%-0.01
mirageB178–947%-0.00
infernoB158–753%0.01
cacheB136–746%-0.02
dust2C125–742%-0.00
ancientC104–640%-0.01
anubisC83–538%0.00
office—21–150%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

99,922Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of Level 6 players
4,631Matches
43.2%Match win rate
38.6%Headshot %
15.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 6 players
13,048MVPs
1,880Hours (in match)
4,859Bombs planted
1,925Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,525
AWP22,779
MP73,260
XM10142,127
P2501,979
SSG 081,748

Lifetime map wins

7,126inferno
6,214nuke
5,865dust2
2,998vertigo
1,408train
584office
394cbble
96lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

536Matches
49%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
79.1ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient4340%0.8113.2
Nuke3563%1.1115.1
Inferno2450%0.9615.5
Dust21947%1.0415.9
Vertigo1436%0.9113.2
Anubis1164%0.8215.1
Overpass1070%0.9913.7
Mirage838%0.7913.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
76.4%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
559msReaction time
55.9%T opening success
35.8%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
10.7%Flash assists
12.52HE damage / grenade
8.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 35.8215% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–13-0.0515%4 Nov →
inferno13–80.068%4 Nov →
cache13–30.0212%4 Nov →
nuke13–10.0126%4 Nov →
cache0–10-0.070%3 Nov →
mirage13–00.0725%3 Nov →
nuke13–10-0.0419%3 Nov →
mirage13–70.0925%3 Nov →
dust213–90.0531%29 Oct →
mirage13–70.0413%29 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0211%29 Oct →
nuke13–40.0413%29 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0922%28 Oct →
inferno13–40.0424%28 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.088%28 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.028%27 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0114%27 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0320%27 Oct →
anubis13–30.0115%27 Oct →
nuke13–30.029%27 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0817%26 Oct →
nuke0–13-0.120%26 Oct →
dust29–130.0423%26 Oct →
dust214–160.0129%25 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0115%25 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0527%24 Oct →
office3–13-0.0829%24 Oct →
office4–00.0967%24 Oct →
ancient13–20.0724%24 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.006%24 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.1111%23 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0529%23 Oct →
mirage11–130.0119%23 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0323%22 Oct →
nuke13–20.0311%22 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0121%22 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0211%8 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.016%8 Oct →
inferno7–130.1617%8 Oct →
nuke13–80.0320%8 Oct →
anubis13–90.0620%8 Oct →
inferno13–100.0712%7 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0325%7 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0011%7 Oct →
inferno13–00.1327%7 Oct →
anubis15–150.0115%4 Oct →
dust213–20.0515%4 Oct →
inferno13–50.0217%4 Oct →
nuke1–13-0.1211%4 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0327%4 Oct →
nuke13–4-0.0020%4 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0315%4 Oct →
nuke11–130.016%4 Oct →
inferno13–10.0524%4 Oct →
cache13–110.0620%2 Oct →
dust26–130.0221%1 Oct →
nuke13–50.1013%1 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0214%1 Oct →
nuke13–20.0916%1 Oct →
dust29–130.0211%1 Oct →
dust213–40.0316%30 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.0017%30 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0317%30 Sept →
mirage13–40.0818%29 Sept →
mirage13–160.0621%28 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.0316%28 Sept →
anubis15–150.0320%28 Sept →
nuke13–70.0714%28 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0419%25 Sept →
mirage13–80.0011%25 Sept →
nuke9–130.0129%25 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0321%25 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.038%25 Sept →
cache10–13-0.1020%25 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0712%25 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0821%25 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0318%25 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0411%24 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.017%24 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0720%24 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.018%23 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0416%23 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0426%23 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.109%17 Sept →
mirage13–50.0323%17 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0228%17 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0018%17 Sept →
cache13–16-0.0514%15 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0419%14 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0637%14 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0123%14 Sept →
nuke12–16-0.0523%13 Sept →
cache13–60.0521%13 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0319%12 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.029%12 Sept →
ancient8–130.0319%12 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0312%12 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.019%12 Sept →
dust23–13-0.110%10 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0219%10 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.