FnK — CS2 Stats

DE76561198172383466[U:1:212117738]Steam profile ↗

2,169Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

6,642Hours in CS38Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport

Premier CS Rating21,997Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#5126 of 15590 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,001 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	51.2%	52.8%
Shot accuracy	17.3%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.01	1.08
Match win rate	44.0%	49.2%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81

Positioning48

Utility77

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–48–2Last 10050%Win rateLWLWLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim8.1

Aggression4.4

Utility7.7

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels1.2

Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 77 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.3° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1

Positioning4.8

Utility7.7

Mechanics6.7

Opening Duels1.8

Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time540ms−37ms

first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 540ms

Headshot accuracy22.9%−0.4%

first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — nuke 13–5

13–1Biggest win — anubis

4Longest win streak

6–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 62% over 21mirageWeakest map · 13% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	A	21	13–8	62%	0.01
anubis	A	18	11–7	61%	0.02
inferno	A	17	10–7	59%	0.02
cache	C	16	7–9	44%	0.01
nuke	C	9	4–5	44%	0.00
mirage	D	8	1–7	13%	-0.02
dust2	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.03
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.05
train	—	1	0–1	0%	0.08
office	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

211,574Lifetime kills

1.01K/D

8,280Matches

44.0%Match win rate

51.2%Headshot %

17.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 10 players

26,169MVPs

7,739Hours (in match)

9,740Bombs planted

4,057Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4777,779

M4A4 / M4A1-S31,262

AWP27,932

Desert Eagle17,169

P2000 / USP-S14,706

Glock-187,329

MAC-105,295

FAMAS4,065

MP93,911

Knife3,486

Lifetime map wins

18,158inferno

11,089dust2

3,835nuke

3,204vertigo

3,076train

1,692cbble

82office

60lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,847Matches

50%Win rate

1.07Avg K/D

81.4ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	187	56%	1.08	16.3
Anubis	167	49%	1.12	16.3
Dust2	105	47%	1.09	16.4
Mirage	103	50%	1.04	14.9
Inferno	100	47%	0.99	15.5
Nuke	60	50%	1.02	16.9
Cache	40	55%	1.14	17.5
Overpass	38	50%	1.16	18.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.5%Headshot accuracy

36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.2%Spray accuracy

80.0%Counter-strafing

10.3°Preaim

552msReaction time

25.7%T opening success

44.1%CT opening success

0.71Enemies flashed / flash

12.9%Flash assists

8.00HE damage / grenade

16.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.6841% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	11–13	-0.00	20%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	22%	26 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.00	22%	26 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.12	36%	26 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.04	18%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.01	24%	25 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.08	15%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.01	21%	25 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	43%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.02	28%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.01	12%	24 Aug →
cache	16–14	-0.03	27%	23 Aug →
inferno	16–14	-0.03	33%	23 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.10	22%	23 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.05	25%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.05	38%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.03	11%	23 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.05	26%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.06	17%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.02	18%	20 Aug →
cache	12–16	-0.02	17%	20 Aug →
anubis	0–7	0.01	13%	16 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.08	33%	16 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	13%	16 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.05	29%	14 Aug →
inferno	9–4	0.01	0%	6 Aug →
inferno	8–8	0.09	31%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.01	22%	6 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.03	26%	6 Aug →
inferno	4–13	0.01	22%	6 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	25%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.06	24%	29 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.11	24%	29 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.00	19%	27 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.04	21%	26 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.06	31%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.05	23%	15 Jul →
mirage	0–13	-0.07	24%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–1	0.11	35%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.14	26%	14 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.01	29%	12 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.05	25%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.03	29%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–7	-0.00	13%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.01	25%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–16	-0.01	22%	12 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.08	5%	12 Jul →
inferno	5–13	0.01	26%	12 Jul →
ancient	5–13	0.01	17%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.03	28%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–1	0.01	30%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.09	7%	10 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.10	18%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	32%	10 Jul →
inferno	16–13	0.10	24%	10 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.11	23%	10 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.05	10%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.09	21%	10 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.01	23%	9 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.03	15%	9 Jul →
cache	1–11	0.03	32%	9 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	13%	9 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	24%	9 Jul →
cache	13–4	-0.02	13%	9 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.02	20%	9 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.11	35%	9 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	26%	9 Jul →
dust2	9–3	0.01	39%	9 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.00	19%	9 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.07	28%	9 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.05	17%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.10	22%	9 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.02	33%	9 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.03	29%	8 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	24%	7 Jul →
vertigo	13–10	0.05	23%	7 Jul →
train	10–13	0.08	40%	7 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.01	24%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–3	-0.07	31%	6 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.07	25%	3 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.02	8%	2 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.12	25%	2 Jul →
nuke	7–9	-0.10	19%	1 Jul →
anubis	16–12	0.05	19%	1 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.00	29%	30 Jun →
anubis	5–13	-0.02	23%	30 Jun →
anubis	8–13	-0.01	20%	30 Jun →
anubis	4–13	-0.06	22%	29 Jun →
anubis	13–10	0.03	11%	29 Jun →
cache	5–13	-0.01	15%	28 Jun →
office	8–13	-0.05	18%	28 Jun →
overpass	15–15	-0.02	12%	28 Jun →
nuke	10–13	-0.05	21%	25 Jun →
inferno	9–4	0.06	16%	24 Jun →
cache	22–19	0.01	28%	23 Jun →
anubis	13–7	0.07	32%	22 Jun →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	35%	21 Jun →
ancient	13–5	-0.02	28%	17 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.00	7%	17 Jun →
ancient	13–5	-0.04	27%	16 Jun →