Snoweh

Snoweh — CS2 Stats

76561198171322005[U:1:211056277]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

122Tracked matches45%Win rate2024Tracked since
208Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingPositional Player
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Sep 2026 (31 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 122 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,136 -1,091 11 Feb – 13 Mar · 14 days played
15,83617,705peak 17,70511 Feb13 Mar
17,911Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2025-02-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

No matches recorded between 26 Sep 2026 and 27 Oct 2026.

Measured 26 Sep 2026 → 27 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning53
Utility5

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52–46–2Last 10052%Win rateLLWLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +6.6pp headshot accuracy · −97ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 648ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim5.4
Utility0.5
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels3.6

Strong T-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 51% on T to 32% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 640ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning5.3
Utility0.5
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time627ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 657ms → last ⅓ avg 627ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%−4.3%
first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 9–1 · nuke, 22 Feb →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · nuke, 20 Feb →
438msFastest reaction time · 2–7 · inferno, 2 Mar →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 2 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
6–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 72% over 18dust2Weakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2312–1152%0.02
mirageS1813–572%0.03
nukeB189–950%0.02
ancientB147–750%-0.00
anubisC83–538%0.01
dust2D72–529%-0.01
vertigoS64–267%0.05
overpass—21–150%-0.02
basalt—10–10%-0.01
italy—10–10%-0.01
edin—10–10%0.08
train—11–0100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

26,397Lifetime kills
1.25K/D · Top 25% of tracked players
803Matches
43.6%Match win rate
20.6%Headshot %
15.8%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
1,918MVPs
208Hours (in match)
389Bombs planted
85Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

508inferno
467dust2
426vertigo
366nuke
76train
56safehouse
47lake
39ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.2%Spray accuracy
81.0%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
640msReaction time
51.1%T opening success
32.2%CT opening success
0.23Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
5.93HE damage / grenade
1.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2293 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 32.2157% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno5–13-0.0729%2 Jan →
ancient7–13-0.0127%2 Jan →
mirage13–80.0614%1 Jan →
nuke6–13-0.0018%20 Apr →
anubis2–13-0.0811%20 Apr →
anubis5–13-0.0836%4 Apr →
basalt7–13-0.0120%1 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.0513%1 Apr →
mirage13–50.0218%1 Apr →
nuke13–50.0221%1 Apr →
nuke13–8-0.040%1 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.0729%14 Mar →
dust26–130.0115%14 Mar →
nuke12–12-0.0117%13 Mar →
ancient11–13-0.0719%13 Mar →
vertigo2–8-0.055%9 Mar →
anubis13–60.060%9 Mar →
italy5–13-0.0121%4 Mar →
ancient16–140.0413%4 Mar →
anubis13–20.0522%3 Mar →
inferno13–60.0921%3 Mar →
inferno13–9-0.056%3 Mar →
ancient8–13-0.027%3 Mar →
nuke13–110.0112%3 Mar →
ancient13–10.0422%2 Mar →
vertigo4–13-0.067%2 Mar →
ancient13–70.0523%2 Mar →
inferno2–7-0.0230%2 Mar →
nuke3–13-0.0427%2 Mar →
mirage13–30.0537%2 Mar →
inferno15–150.0016%2 Mar →
ancient14–16-0.0013%1 Mar →
dust213–9-0.0224%1 Mar →
anubis11–13-0.0123%1 Mar →
nuke11–130.0420%1 Mar →
nuke13–20.0519%1 Mar →
inferno13–40.0021%1 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.0316%28 Feb →
edin7–130.0837%28 Feb →
train13–6-0.0217%28 Feb →
dust213–40.0240%28 Feb →
vertigo9–20.1129%28 Feb →
anubis13–20.1123%27 Feb →
vertigo9–10.1325%27 Feb →
vertigo9–20.1120%27 Feb →
inferno6–9-0.0638%27 Feb →
inferno9–50.0414%27 Feb →
mirage13–110.0830%26 Feb →
anubis11–13-0.007%26 Feb →
inferno9–50.1114%25 Feb →
dust211–13-0.0423%25 Feb →
inferno13–3-0.0233%25 Feb →
inferno9–50.0210%25 Feb →
mirage13–40.0524%25 Feb →
overpass13–80.0128%24 Feb →
mirage8–130.0526%24 Feb →
mirage13–40.0119%24 Feb →
mirage13–110.1020%24 Feb →
mirage13–60.0831%24 Feb →
ancient5–130.0632%24 Feb →
nuke4–13-0.0219%24 Feb →
ancient13–4-0.0310%23 Feb →
dust25–130.0133%22 Feb →
inferno13–70.1322%22 Feb →
nuke9–10.2722%22 Feb →
nuke9–20.1010%22 Feb →
vertigo9–20.0416%22 Feb →
inferno7–90.0518%22 Feb →
inferno9–60.0427%22 Feb →
inferno14–16-0.0619%22 Feb →
nuke6–13-0.0224%22 Feb →
inferno9–70.1125%21 Feb →
mirage12–60.0128%20 Feb →
mirage13–10.0431%20 Feb →
nuke8–130.1150%20 Feb →
nuke13–30.0250%20 Feb →
nuke13–100.0110%20 Feb →
inferno9–13-0.0130%20 Feb →
ancient13–80.035%20 Feb →
dust26–130.0018%20 Feb →
inferno8–13-0.0127%19 Feb →
nuke13–11-0.0413%19 Feb →
anubis4–13-0.0019%19 Feb →
nuke3–13-0.0722%19 Feb →
inferno11–130.0614%19 Feb →
mirage7–130.0224%19 Feb →
nuke7–13-0.0424%19 Feb →
ancient13–10-0.0215%18 Feb →
inferno4–130.0426%18 Feb →
overpass11–13-0.0416%16 Feb →
inferno11–130.0112%16 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0321%13 Feb →
mirage13–10-0.0020%12 Feb →
inferno13–90.0427%11 Feb →
ancient13–100.0218%11 Feb →
mirage13–10-0.0115%11 Feb →
mirage13–90.0820%10 Feb →
mirage2–130.0326%10 Feb →
inferno13–100.0728%10 Feb →
dust25–13-0.089%10 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.