Pitmarker — CS2 Stats

76561198169864691[U:1:209598963]✓ No bans

964Tracked matches52%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating14,887Blue band · top ~29% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14764 of 22995 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPitmarkerFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER14,887 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning44
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44524Last 10044%Win rateLLLLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.2
Aggression5.0
Utility5.0
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch4.8

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 617ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning4.4
Utility5.0
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time614ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 659ms → last ⅓ avg 614ms
Headshot accuracy16.9%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 14.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.08Best rating — fachwerk 13–3
132Biggest win — cache
4Longest win streak
L4Current streak
125In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
20Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 57% over 7nukeWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C27101737%-0.02
ancientB2091145%-0.01
cacheC146843%-0.02
anubisB137654%-0.04
nukeD93633%-0.02
infernoB84450%-0.02
mirageA74357%-0.01
fachwerk110100%0.08
eldorado1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

32Matches
56%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
73.0ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno8100%1.0613.1
Ancient743%0.8414.0
Dust2560%0.6210.8
Anubis450%0.6810.8
Mirage333%0.9416.3
Overpass333%1.1617.0
Cache20%0.7814.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.5%Spray accuracy
81.1%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
617msReaction time
30.0%T opening success
48.0%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
9.52HE damage / grenade
5.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.0164% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–13-0.0621%26 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0116%26 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0130%26 Aug
dust213–16-0.0216%24 Aug
cache13–11-0.0215%24 Aug
cache16–13-0.0714%22 Aug
mirage13–90.0416%22 Aug
anubis16–14-0.0215%22 Aug
cache10–13-0.087%21 Aug
mirage6–13-0.038%21 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0522%21 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0412%21 Aug
dust216–14-0.0416%21 Aug
nuke13–110.0528%19 Aug
dust213–110.0620%19 Aug
ancient3–130.0322%19 Aug
mirage13–160.0020%18 Aug
dust213–7-0.0519%17 Aug
cache12–16-0.0020%16 Aug
cache13–8-0.0012%16 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0315%16 Aug
ancient16–140.0222%16 Aug
dust24–13-0.0419%16 Aug
ancient15–150.0117%16 Aug
fachwerk13–30.0811%16 Aug
dust23–13-0.017%16 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0012%15 Aug
dust212–16-0.0823%15 Aug
dust213–11-0.0322%15 Aug
nuke9–130.0111%15 Aug
dust213–40.0022%15 Aug
dust29–13-0.0413%14 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0718%14 Aug
ancient13–30.0611%14 Aug
ancient13–60.018%14 Aug
mirage10–130.0013%13 Aug
inferno13–3-0.043%12 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0313%12 Aug
nuke13–10-0.027%12 Aug
nuke15–150.0417%12 Aug
cache10–13-0.0514%12 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0315%12 Aug
cache8–13-0.0815%12 Aug
dust213–100.0514%11 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0317%11 Aug
dust213–6-0.0015%11 Aug
cache13–5-0.0117%11 Aug
dust26–130.0417%11 Aug
cache7–13-0.0210%10 Aug
ancient13–70.0328%10 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0115%9 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0619%9 Aug
eldorado6–9-0.0418%9 Aug
dust210–13-0.0413%9 Aug
anubis13–100.0213%9 Aug
cache6–13-0.0213%9 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0316%9 Aug
anubis8–13-0.1013%6 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0610%6 Aug
inferno13–90.0016%6 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0920%6 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0415%5 Aug
nuke7–13-0.069%5 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0616%5 Aug
ancient13–110.029%5 Aug
dust25–13-0.0317%4 Aug
cache13–20.0616%4 Aug
dust26–13-0.030%4 Aug
anubis13–110.0415%3 Aug
anubis5–13-0.147%3 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0116%2 Aug
anubis13–6-0.047%23 Jul
dust213–8-0.0623%22 Jul
dust216–12-0.0415%22 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0010%22 Jul
ancient7–130.0024%22 Jul
anubis7–13-0.115%22 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0417%22 Jul
inferno12–16-0.0119%21 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0116%21 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0615%21 Jul
cache12–16-0.0114%21 Jul
dust213–100.0218%21 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0511%21 Jul
dust210–13-0.039%21 Jul
dust212–16-0.0218%20 Jul
cache3–13-0.0430%20 Jul
dust210–13-0.0415%20 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0523%20 Jul
dust211–130.0324%20 Jul
anubis6–13-0.059%20 Jul
dust28–130.089%20 Jul
inferno13–50.0417%20 Jul
dust25–13-0.1010%20 Jul
ancient16–13-0.0419%20 Jul
cache13–110.018%20 Jul
ancient16–140.019%20 Jul
dust213–16-0.0410%19 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0313%19 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0822%19 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →