lil cicceli

lil cicceli — CS2 Stats

NA76561198167403149[U:1:207137421]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,217Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,853Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,281Top 50% of 213,211 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#79509 of 259959 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,281 +282 17 Aug – 4 Nov · 33 days played
19,99922,707peak 22,70717 Aug4 Nov
22,707Peak Premier in tracked matches
32Days played since 2026-08-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,426 below peak (22,707)
  • -2,426 over 30 days · declining
  • +282 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,719 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate51.1%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy14.5%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.961.051.060.10 short
Match win rate43.0%45.7%46.3%3.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlil cicceliFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,281 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning50
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–46–4Last 10050%Win rateLLWLLWTWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +5.6pp headshot accuracy · +69ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 683ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 685ms

Last 20

  • 6–13–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 651ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim5.5
Utility4.8
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 638ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning5.0
Utility4.8
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time623ms+51ms
first ⅓ avg 572ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms
Headshot accuracy21.1%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 21.0% → last ⅓ avg 21.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 7–13 · mirage, 14 Sept →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · dust2, 1 Nov →
391msFastest reaction time · 0–5 · mirage, 27 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 31 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 69% over 13dust2Weakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2812–1643%0.00
ancientA2113–862%0.00
nukeS139–469%0.02
anubisA116–555%0.01
dust2D103–730%0.01
infernoC94–544%0.01
cacheC73–443%-0.01
poseidon—10–10%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

138,977Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
7,769Matches
43.0%Match win rate
51.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
14.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
16,395MVPs
2,903Hours (in match)
3,945Bombs planted
1,138Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4743,605
AWP15,446
UMP-452,755
P2502,490
MAC-102,396
SSG 082,391

Lifetime map wins

3,968dust2
3,401inferno
2,753nuke
1,249cbble
493train
275lake
230vertigo
169office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

11Matches
55%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
—ADR
62%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage333%0.7913.7
Ancient250%0.9815.0
Inferno10%0.428.0
Anubis1100%1.1110.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.2%Headshot accuracy
30.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
71.7%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
638msReaction time
35.0%T opening success
40.5%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
3.0%Flash assists
7.93HE damage / grenade
4.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.975% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–130.0218%4 Nov →
dust210–130.0140%1 Nov →
anubis13–20.0418%1 Nov →
dust23–130.0215%1 Nov →
dust27–130.0623%29 Oct →
mirage13–60.0138%29 Oct →
nuke15–150.0629%29 Oct →
cache13–70.0222%29 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.099%25 Oct →
nuke13–30.0129%22 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0421%22 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0614%22 Oct →
anubis9–130.0417%15 Oct →
dust214–160.0017%15 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0810%15 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0122%14 Oct →
dust213–20.0620%14 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0416%14 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.1232%8 Oct →
dust27–130.0217%8 Oct →
anubis13–110.0416%7 Oct →
inferno13–90.0218%1 Oct →
ancient13–3-0.0121%1 Oct →
dust216–140.0217%1 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0032%1 Oct →
cache2–13-0.0622%1 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0310%1 Oct →
ancient13–80.0120%29 Sept →
nuke13–30.0420%29 Sept →
ancient13–50.0233%29 Sept →
ancient13–40.0423%24 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0216%24 Sept →
cache13–70.0524%23 Sept →
nuke9–130.0122%23 Sept →
inferno15–150.0221%23 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0321%21 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0131%21 Sept →
ancient13–100.0414%17 Sept →
mirage13–90.0432%16 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0118%16 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0311%15 Sept →
anubis13–50.0730%15 Sept →
mirage9–130.0426%15 Sept →
dust213–70.0221%15 Sept →
nuke13–60.0223%15 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0030%15 Sept →
mirage13–50.0122%15 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0431%15 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0033%14 Sept →
inferno8–130.0421%14 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0127%14 Sept →
mirage7–130.0925%14 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0218%14 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0724%10 Sept →
ancient13–60.0522%10 Sept →
poseidon6–9-0.109%10 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0015%9 Sept →
nuke10–130.0311%9 Sept →
anubis13–110.0221%9 Sept →
mirage4–130.0825%7 Sept →
nuke13–20.0420%7 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0121%7 Sept →
mirage13–90.0317%3 Sept →
cache15–150.0218%3 Sept →
mirage13–80.0330%1 Sept →
inferno11–130.0127%1 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0126%1 Sept →
mirage10–130.0318%1 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0322%31 Aug →
mirage13–10.0920%31 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.0220%31 Aug →
anubis16–14-0.0416%31 Aug →
mirage0–5-0.0325%27 Aug →
ancient11–130.0322%27 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0224%27 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0115%27 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.0123%26 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0022%26 Aug →
nuke13–100.0225%25 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0124%25 Aug →
mirage13–100.0527%25 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0029%25 Aug →
ancient13–30.0823%24 Aug →
nuke13–90.0418%24 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.0119%24 Aug →
mirage13–50.0522%24 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0329%24 Aug →
anubis13–60.0618%23 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0425%23 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0514%19 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0413%19 Aug →
mirage15–15-0.0016%19 Aug →
ancient10–130.0227%19 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0719%18 Aug →
nuke13–40.0521%18 Aug →
ancient16–140.0122%18 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0623%18 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0323%18 Aug →
inferno13–100.0221%18 Aug →
ancient16–13-0.0110%17 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.