Fish

Fish — CS2 Stats

US76561198165279368[U:1:205013640]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,008Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since
3,727Hours in CS47Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,108Top 50% of 204,412 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#78652 of 251541 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,175 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,108 +2,055 12 Sept – 13 Oct · 8 days played
18,05320,108peak 20,10812 Sept13 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,175 +0 25 Sept – 26 Sept · 2 observations
1,1751,175peak 1,17525 Sept26 Sept
20,108Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,175Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2026-07-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,175
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 26 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-25
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-25

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 20,108
  • +1,267 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,892 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-25
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-25

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches116——
Win rate47%——
K/D2.65——
Headshot %80%——

Measured 9 Sep 2026 → 14 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,138), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate54.1%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy3.7%12.7%13.0%9.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.001.051.060.06 short
Match win rate42.9%45.7%46.3%3.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFishFACEITLevel 7 · 1,175 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,108 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,175csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning59
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT57–41–2Last 10057%Win rateWWWWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · −56ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 486ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility4.9
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.9
Utility4.9
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time575ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 589ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 13 Sept →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 16–14 · dust2, 9 Aug →
398msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · nuke, 16 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · overpass, 27 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W4Current streak
12–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 15mirageWeakest map · 40% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2415–963%-0.01
nukeA1810–856%-0.01
mirageC156–940%-0.03
anubisS1510–567%-0.01
dust2A85–363%0.01
infernoA74–357%0.00
train—42–250%-0.01
office—31–233%-0.03
vertigo—32–167%-0.05
overpass—22–0100%0.03
cache—10–10%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 15). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

84,798Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
3,546Matches
42.9%Match win rate
54.1%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players
3.7%Shot accuracy
7,923MVPs
2,549Hours (in match)
3,554Bombs planted
1,545Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4736,233
AWP10,622
MAC-101,957
MP91,955
Knife1,561

Lifetime map wins

5,974nuke
3,869inferno
3,533vertigo
2,569dust2
1,037train
76office
30italy
12safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,022Matches
48%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
74.4ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis17956%0.9515.0
Ancient17657%0.9615.5
Mirage12246%0.8613.4
Nuke12148%1.0115.1
Inferno9038%0.8814.1
Vertigo6152%0.9816.0
Dust25843%0.8914.7
Overpass4149%0.9615.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.5%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.1%Spray accuracy
83.0%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
571msReaction time
51.1%T opening success
43.0%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
11.1%Flash assists
9.57HE damage / grenade
7.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.395 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–20.1827%13 Oct →
nuke13–50.0619%13 Oct →
mirage13–30.0827%13 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0125%13 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0325%12 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.1022%12 Oct →
dust213–80.0227%11 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0215%11 Oct →
ancient12–16-0.0216%11 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0813%9 Oct →
anubis13–20.0025%9 Oct →
nuke13–3-0.0535%5 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.084%5 Oct →
nuke13–80.0523%5 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0310%4 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0424%4 Oct →
overpass13–10-0.0020%4 Oct →
anubis13–80.0331%4 Oct →
nuke13–100.0418%3 Oct →
anubis19–22-0.0115%3 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.0423%29 Sept →
dust213–100.0621%28 Sept →
office5–13-0.0717%27 Sept →
overpass13–10.0523%27 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0113%24 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0314%24 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0020%23 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0622%23 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0616%22 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0415%22 Sept →
train11–130.0428%22 Sept →
office5–13-0.0040%22 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0221%21 Sept →
anubis16–12-0.0527%21 Sept →
nuke1–13-0.1224%21 Sept →
train12–12-0.0631%21 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0812%19 Sept →
nuke13–100.0327%19 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0715%19 Sept →
nuke11–130.0321%16 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0217%16 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0218%16 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0114%13 Sept →
anubis16–13-0.0221%13 Sept →
inferno9–30.2025%13 Sept →
cache7–130.0128%13 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0224%13 Sept →
dust213–60.0218%12 Sept →
anubis16–14-0.0118%12 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0515%11 Sept →
ancient13–30.0322%11 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0319%9 Sept →
train13–1-0.036%9 Sept →
train13–110.0213%8 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0622%8 Sept →
vertigo8–13-0.0620%8 Sept →
office13–10-0.0134%8 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0533%7 Sept →
nuke13–70.0520%7 Sept →
vertigo13–10-0.0319%6 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0321%6 Sept →
anubis5–3-0.0021%6 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0520%6 Sept →
anubis8–130.0028%5 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.0416%5 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0725%5 Sept →
anubis13–110.0526%4 Sept →
dust210–130.0024%4 Sept →
nuke13–70.0017%2 Sept →
vertigo13–9-0.0612%2 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0120%2 Sept →
ancient13–110.0113%2 Sept →
nuke13–60.0040%1 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.0221%30 Aug →
ancient19–16-0.0129%30 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0821%29 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0218%29 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0438%26 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.0221%26 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0225%26 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0430%25 Aug →
ancient10–130.0113%24 Aug →
ancient13–60.0415%24 Aug →
ancient16–13-0.0812%17 Aug →
anubis13–110.0133%17 Aug →
anubis13–60.0412%15 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0525%15 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0141%9 Aug →
ancient13–100.0417%1 Aug →
inferno13–50.0923%1 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0814%27 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0622%26 Jul →
ancient13–6-0.0316%26 Jul →
mirage11–130.0224%26 Jul →
ancient13–60.0322%25 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0519%25 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0228%23 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.038%23 Jul →
dust213–80.0525%21 Jul →
nuke13–8-0.0429%20 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.