Myyrä — CS2 Stats

76561198159133210[U:1:198867482]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

395Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since

1,200Hours in CS

CSDB Rating3.6 Learning

Premier CS Rating12,706Blue band · top ~40.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#21759 of 31878 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=928), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 4 median	Level 5 median	vs Level 5
Headshot rate	34.3%	42.5%	44.2%	9.9% short
Shot accuracy	16.2%	10.9%	11.2%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.04	0.99	1.04	meets
Match win rate	41.3%	44.2%	45.3%	4.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim44

Positioning31

Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–52–2Last 10046%Win rateWWWLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.4

Aggression2.4

Utility5.3

Positioning3.1

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 38% on CT to 15% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.4

Positioning3.1

Utility5.3

Mechanics4.1

Opening Duels1.1

Win Impact2.8

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time541ms−54ms

first ⅓ avg 594ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms

Headshot accuracy8.9%−6.2%

first ⅓ avg 15.2% → last ⅓ avg 8.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — vertigo 13–4

13–1Biggest win — ancient

5Longest win streak

W3Current streak

4–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 17anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	S	17	12–5	71%	0.00
ancient	B	16	8–8	50%	-0.02
dust2	C	14	5–9	36%	-0.00
mirage	C	13	5–8	38%	-0.00
vertigo	A	13	8–5	62%	0.02
inferno	B	11	5–6	45%	0.01
anubis	D	7	1–6	14%	-0.01
cache	—	4	0–4	0%	-0.01
overpass	—	3	2–1	67%	0.03
train	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

59,846Lifetime kills

1.04K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players

3,827Matches

41.3%Match win rate

34.3%Headshot %

16.2%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 4 players

6,903MVPs

1,200Hours (in match)

2,200Bombs planted

781Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4713,007

M4A4 / M4A1-S7,336

AWP6,035

Desert Eagle4,135

P2000 / USP-S3,185

Glock-182,347

MAC-102,297

MP91,934

P901,862

SG 5531,704

Lifetime map wins

3,359dust2

3,330train

3,291inferno

3,065vertigo

2,058nuke

1,059cbble

565office

196lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

93Matches

55%Win rate

1.05Avg K/D

76.8ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Nuke	11	64%	0.96	14.3
Ancient	11	82%	1.32	16.3
Vertigo	9	44%	1.27	16.4
Inferno	6	33%	0.85	13.0
Mirage	5	40%	0.92	14.4
Train	4	50%	1.01	14.5
Dust2	3	100%	1.15	14.0
Cache	1	100%	0.91	10.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

9.4%Headshot accuracy

31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.7%Spray accuracy

68.3%Counter-strafing

10.6°Preaim

556msReaction time

14.9%T opening success

38.5%CT opening success

0.46Enemies flashed / flash

5.0%Flash assists

6.82HE damage / grenade

13.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 9.3656% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4562 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 14.8951% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–11	-0.05	9%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	23%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.03	9%	17 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.02	10%	17 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.11	8%	9 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	7%	9 Aug →
mirage	8–2	-0.00	6%	9 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.01	8%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	5%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.06	13%	8 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.01	10%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–3	-0.01	5%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.04	9%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.01	4%	6 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.03	10%	19 Jul →
ancient	3–13	-0.04	12%	19 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.08	12%	19 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	12%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.05	7%	19 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.06	0%	7 Jul →
overpass	9–13	0.03	6%	5 Jul →
inferno	16–14	0.05	8%	5 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.08	15%	5 Jul →
mirage	0–2	0.00	0%	28 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.09	12%	28 Jun →
anubis	11–13	0.08	7%	28 Jun →
nuke	13–11	-0.05	13%	28 Jun →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	10%	28 Jun →
mirage	5–12	0.05	5%	28 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	13%	28 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.01	14%	28 Jun →
inferno	7–13	0.04	9%	28 Jun →
anubis	1–13	-0.04	4%	28 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	14%	25 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.03	3%	25 Jun →
dust2	13–3	0.05	17%	24 Jun →
inferno	13–4	0.00	13%	24 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.07	16%	24 Jun →
dust2	9–13	0.03	11%	23 Jun →
cache	7–13	0.03	9%	14 Jun →
ancient	5–13	-0.02	8%	9 Jun →
nuke	13–2	-0.00	7%	9 Jun →
nuke	7–13	0.02	6%	29 May →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	12%	29 May →
inferno	15–15	0.04	16%	26 May →
nuke	4–13	-0.04	15%	22 May →
dust2	7–13	0.03	11%	21 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	14%	19 May →
inferno	13–7	0.03	5%	19 May →
cache	8–13	-0.02	16%	19 May →
nuke	5–13	0.01	12%	16 May →
inferno	13–16	0.06	8%	14 May →
nuke	13–9	0.03	3%	14 May →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	15%	13 May →
ancient	5–12	-0.08	9%	13 May →
dust2	10–13	0.06	13%	12 May →
train	6–13	0.03	25%	24 Apr →
vertigo	8–13	0.06	18%	24 Apr →
vertigo	13–3	0.10	23%	23 Apr →
ancient	13–4	0.13	22%	23 Apr →
ancient	13–6	0.01	6%	23 Apr →
nuke	13–3	0.03	14%	21 Apr →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	7%	21 Apr →
vertigo	5–13	0.02	13%	21 Apr →
dust2	13–7	0.05	16%	19 Apr →
anubis	13–16	0.01	15%	19 Apr →
mirage	13–9	0.07	11%	19 Apr →
nuke	13–8	0.01	16%	15 Apr →
vertigo	13–4	-0.02	18%	15 Apr →
vertigo	13–6	0.00	25%	14 Apr →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	15%	12 Apr →
nuke	9–13	0.02	19%	12 Apr →
anubis	13–5	0.00	12%	12 Apr →
vertigo	13–5	0.07	27%	12 Apr →
ancient	15–15	-0.04	16%	9 Apr →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	9%	9 Apr →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	14%	8 Apr →
nuke	13–10	-0.05	16%	6 Apr →
overpass	13–5	-0.04	17%	6 Apr →
overpass	13–10	0.09	9%	6 Apr →
vertigo	13–9	-0.06	17%	29 Mar →
nuke	7–13	-0.07	9%	19 Mar →
vertigo	10–13	-0.07	6%	19 Mar →
anubis	9–13	-0.08	15%	1 Mar →
vertigo	13–4	0.16	10%	1 Mar →
inferno	8–13	-0.05	12%	1 Mar →
nuke	13–6	0.01	13%	26 Feb →
mirage	9–13	0.02	16%	22 Feb →
vertigo	8–13	0.01	28%	21 Feb →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	16%	21 Feb →
ancient	13–5	-0.01	11%	21 Feb →
nuke	13–3	0.03	14%	21 Feb →
nuke	13–1	0.08	12%	21 Feb →
inferno	13–6	0.10	10%	20 Feb →
vertigo	7–13	-0.01	21%	20 Feb →
vertigo	13–5	-0.03	35%	19 Feb →
train	7–13	-0.05	8%	19 Feb →
ancient	5–13	-0.12	11%	14 Feb →
ancient	9–13	-0.06	12%	14 Feb →
vertigo	13–8	0.02	11%	14 Feb →