sakki

sakki — CS2 Stats

MC76561198152947796[U:1:192682068]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

363Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,927Hours in CS10Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,377Purple band · top ~26.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Oct 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,377 +466 4 Sept – 24 Oct · 27 days played
14,00717,124peak 17,1244 Sept24 Oct
17,249Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,747 below peak (17,124)
  • +614 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,623 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate41.0%43.8%44.8%3.8% short
Shot accuracy16.8%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.031.021.03meets
Match win rate46.0%44.7%45.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsakkiFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER15,377 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning61
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–51–3Last 10046%Win rateLLWWWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +6.2pp headshot accuracy · −57ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility5.0
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 61% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 61% on T to 38% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning6.1
Utility5.0
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time601ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 601ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%+3.0%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–6 · ancient, 15 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 6–9 · overpass, 12 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · dust2, 24 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 26 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
6–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB179–853%-0.00
mirageA169–756%-0.01
anubisC146–843%-0.02
infernoD124–833%0.00
dust2C114–736%-0.01
cacheC114–736%-0.03
nukeA74–357%-0.00
vertigoS64–267%-0.00
overpass—31–233%0.00
eldorado—21–150%0.05
office—10–10%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

51,023Lifetime kills
1.03K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players
2,478Matches
46.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
41.0%Headshot %
16.8%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players
6,282MVPs
1,140Hours (in match)
1,682Bombs planted
575Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,910inferno
2,553nuke
2,102dust2
1,820vertigo
614train
312office
155cbble
138lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

28Matches
46%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
73.3ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1050%0.9612.8
Mirage540%0.7513.4
Inferno425%0.8215.3
Ancient475%0.8812.3
Cache367%0.8420.0
Vertigo10%0.436.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.3%Spray accuracy
72.3%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
609msReaction time
60.9%T opening success
37.8%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
6.44HE damage / grenade
11.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.8227% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass6–9-0.1320%25 Oct →
inferno6–9-0.0128%25 Oct →
vertigo9–30.1030%25 Oct →
nuke9–50.0729%25 Oct →
eldorado9–60.0441%25 Oct →
dust25–130.0237%24 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0012%22 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0522%22 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0517%21 Oct →
ancient13–80.0423%20 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.018%20 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0119%15 Oct →
inferno1–9-0.0311%15 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0216%12 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0618%9 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.028%8 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0127%7 Oct →
dust213–90.0022%7 Oct →
cache15–15-0.0629%7 Oct →
vertigo9–6-0.0338%7 Oct →
mirage13–70.0331%6 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.0610%6 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.0513%6 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.0016%6 Oct →
vertigo13–6-0.0523%5 Oct →
anubis16–14-0.0510%5 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0126%5 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0218%5 Oct →
vertigo9–6-0.0119%5 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0013%3 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0214%3 Oct →
cache13–110.0515%3 Oct →
overpass9–40.1015%3 Oct →
nuke9–60.0830%3 Oct →
inferno7–90.0515%1 Oct →
mirage2–10-0.0426%29 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0326%29 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0414%29 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0810%29 Sept →
cache2–13-0.0423%29 Sept →
inferno9–10.104%29 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0616%28 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.019%28 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0711%28 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.025%27 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.058%27 Sept →
ancient16–140.0913%27 Sept →
anubis16–130.0010%27 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0410%27 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0014%27 Sept →
dust213–20.0333%26 Sept →
cache13–9-0.018%26 Sept →
inferno9–6-0.0115%26 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.079%26 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0210%26 Sept →
cache10–13-0.069%26 Sept →
ancient13–40.0111%26 Sept →
mirage13–80.0111%25 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0413%25 Sept →
cache13–11-0.035%25 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0719%25 Sept →
cache1–13-0.0818%25 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0119%25 Sept →
inferno11–130.0519%25 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0318%25 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0521%24 Sept →
nuke13–80.0126%24 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0222%24 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0014%23 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0514%23 Sept →
dust20–13-0.0710%23 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0119%23 Sept →
dust28–130.0119%23 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.064%23 Sept →
mirage13–60.017%23 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0122%22 Sept →
mirage9–130.1014%21 Sept →
inferno9–60.0720%21 Sept →
vertigo8–130.0620%19 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0217%19 Sept →
anubis13–50.019%15 Sept →
mirage7–130.0119%15 Sept →
ancient13–60.1711%15 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0818%14 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0119%14 Sept →
anubis13–20.0421%13 Sept →
mirage13–70.0211%13 Sept →
cache9–130.0217%13 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0514%13 Sept →
anubis13–110.0213%13 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0827%13 Sept →
ancient11–130.0218%12 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.048%12 Sept →
overpass6–90.0450%12 Sept →
eldorado8–80.0719%12 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0241%12 Sept →
vertigo4–13-0.0913%12 Sept →
office8–13-0.0722%12 Sept →
ancient13–60.0514%12 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0312%12 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.