WhoMadeThatMess

WhoMadeThatMess — CS2 Stats

DE76561198147603921[U:1:187338193]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

442Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since
874Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,755Top 50% of 200,982 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#69194 of 247867 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+369Premier CS Rating · 20,386 → 20,755

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,755 -291 5 Aug – 1 Oct · 28 days played
19,84821,896peak 21,8965 Aug1 Oct
21,945Peak Premier in tracked matches
24Days played since 2026-08-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,141 below peak (21,896)
  • -280 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,245 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches29——
Win rate59%——
K/D1.21——
Headshot %58%——

Measured 3 Sep 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,868), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate45.7%44.8%45.7%meets
Shot accuracy17.7%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.331.031.05above
Match win rate52.5%45.2%45.7%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 7 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWhoMadeThatMessFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER20,755 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning67
Utility19

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51–44–5Last 10051%Win rateWWLWWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −3.8pp headshot accuracy · −12ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility1.9
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels4.9
Clutch1.6

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning6.7
Utility1.9
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact8.6

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time536ms+9ms
first ⅓ avg 527ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy22.2%−2.9%
first ⅓ avg 25.1% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–6 · mirage, 5 Aug →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 7–5 · anubis, 20 Aug →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · anubis, 30 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 30 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
12–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
21Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 60% over 15infernoWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB1910–953%0.02
mirageA1911–858%0.03
dust2B189–950%0.01
anubisA159–660%0.01
ancientC125–742%-0.00
infernoC104–640%-0.01
nukeC73–443%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

51,188Lifetime kills
1.33K/D · Top 10% of Level 6 players
2,047Matches
52.5%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 6 players
45.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players
17.7%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 6 players
7,628MVPs
874Hours (in match)
3,016Bombs planted
551Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,157dust2
2,063inferno
681nuke
411vertigo
234train
159cbble
71office
33safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

49Matches
61%Win rate
1.28Avg K/D
88.0ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

28%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1173%1.2417.4
Mirage1136%1.2718.1
Dust26100%1.7020.2
Vertigo475%1.1617.8
Overpass333%0.8015.3
Train367%1.0219.7
Inferno367%1.4318.0
Nuke20%1.0713.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.9%Headshot accuracy
39.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
82.3%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
528msReaction time
42.1%T opening success
56.8%CT opening success
0.37Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
6.98HE damage / grenade
1.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3668 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–110.0529%1 Oct →
ancient13–80.0619%30 Sept →
dust212–160.0025%30 Sept →
cache13–100.0527%30 Sept →
mirage13–10.0412%30 Sept →
anubis13–50.0519%30 Sept →
anubis5–8-0.0129%11 Sept →
nuke16–140.0321%10 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0125%10 Sept →
cache13–16-0.048%7 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0315%6 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0022%6 Sept →
dust213–30.0734%5 Sept →
cache13–30.0129%5 Sept →
mirage13–100.0233%5 Sept →
ancient9–130.0127%4 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0529%4 Sept →
inferno13–90.0123%4 Sept →
anubis13–100.0223%4 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0119%4 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0123%4 Sept →
nuke15–150.0521%4 Sept →
mirage16–140.0026%3 Sept →
dust29–130.0020%3 Sept →
dust213–110.0725%3 Sept →
nuke12–16-0.0123%3 Sept →
cache13–10.1014%3 Sept →
ancient16–120.0225%3 Sept →
cache15–150.0519%2 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0414%2 Sept →
anubis13–70.0616%30 Aug →
mirage13–160.0913%30 Aug →
nuke13–16-0.0528%30 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0323%30 Aug →
nuke16–14-0.0319%22 Aug →
mirage13–90.0516%22 Aug →
anubis13–60.1322%22 Aug →
cache13–100.0337%22 Aug →
anubis13–70.0126%22 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0121%22 Aug →
mirage5–130.0221%22 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0118%22 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0413%21 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0226%21 Aug →
cache15–150.0323%21 Aug →
anubis8–130.0723%21 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0414%21 Aug →
ancient10–130.0435%21 Aug →
ancient13–70.0115%21 Aug →
mirage13–110.0422%21 Aug →
cache13–60.0121%21 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0113%20 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0123%20 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.1014%20 Aug →
cache10–130.0418%20 Aug →
anubis7–5-0.0743%20 Aug →
mirage15–15-0.0222%18 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0515%18 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0220%18 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0527%18 Aug →
cache9–130.0322%18 Aug →
dust213–70.0918%17 Aug →
cache13–110.0226%17 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0120%17 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0620%16 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0133%16 Aug →
inferno13–50.0519%16 Aug →
mirage11–130.0316%16 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0223%16 Aug →
cache13–160.0218%16 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0943%15 Aug →
anubis13–80.0430%15 Aug →
anubis16–140.0926%15 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0118%15 Aug →
cache13–50.1333%15 Aug →
cache11–130.0220%15 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0616%14 Aug →
mirage13–100.0323%14 Aug →
mirage13–80.0532%14 Aug →
cache13–90.0420%14 Aug →
dust26–130.0523%14 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0230%14 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0528%14 Aug →
dust216–140.0322%14 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0527%14 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0328%13 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0119%13 Aug →
dust213–60.0322%13 Aug →
ancient16–13-0.0218%10 Aug →
inferno12–16-0.0315%10 Aug →
mirage11–130.0321%7 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0016%6 Aug →
ancient10–130.0331%6 Aug →
dust213–2-0.0435%6 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.1019%6 Aug →
mirage13–160.0828%6 Aug →
mirage13–60.1433%5 Aug →
dust213–50.0532%5 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0133%5 Aug →
inferno13–80.0628%5 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.