WhoMadeThatMess — CS2 Stats

DE76561198147603921[U:1:187338193]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

407Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since

857Hours in CS

CSDB Rating6.3 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,303Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#10093 of 30142 tracked

FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSilver III

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=862), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 6 median	Level 7 median	vs Level 7
Headshot rate	45.5%	44.9%	46.2%	meets
Shot accuracy	18.0%	11.8%	12.5%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.34	1.04	1.06	above
Match win rate	52.5%	45.3%	45.9%	above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 7 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87

Positioning59

Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–50–3Last 10047%Win rateWWWWWLLLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.7

Aggression7.5

Utility3.2

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels2.9

Clutch1.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7

Positioning5.9

Utility3.2

Mechanics7.3

Opening Duels2.9

Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time538ms−21ms

first ⅓ avg 558ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms

Headshot accuracy22.0%−0.3%

first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 22.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — dust2 13–2

13–2Biggest win — dust2

5Longest win streak

W5Current streak

9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 83% over 6mirageWeakest map · 40% over 20

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	22	10–12	45%	0.01
mirage	C	20	8–12	40%	0.02
anubis	B	16	8–8	50%	0.01
cache	B	14	7–7	50%	0.03
ancient	C	12	5–7	42%	-0.00
inferno	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.01
nuke	S	6	5–1	83%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

50,357Lifetime kills

1.34K/D · Top 10% of Level 6 players

2,011Matches

52.5%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 6 players

45.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players

18.0%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 6 players

7,502MVPs

857Hours (in match)

2,960Bombs planted

530Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4718,424

AWP7,283

M4A4 / M4A1-S6,894

Desert Eagle4,007

P2000 / USP-S2,805

Glock-181,995

UMP-45906

P250818

FAMAS801

SSG 08676

Lifetime map wins

2,097dust2

2,032inferno

619nuke

411vertigo

234train

159cbble

71office

33safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

49Matches

61%Win rate

1.28Avg K/D

88.0ADR

53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

28%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	11	36%	1.27	18.1
Anubis	11	73%	1.24	17.4
Dust2	6	100%	1.70	20.2
Vertigo	4	75%	1.16	17.8
Inferno	3	67%	1.43	18.0
Overpass	3	33%	0.80	15.3
Train	3	67%	1.02	19.7
Ancient	2	50%	1.22	16.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.5%Headshot accuracy

39.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.6%Spray accuracy

82.6%Counter-strafing

8.5°Preaim

537msReaction time

32.1%T opening success

50.7%CT opening success

0.49Enemies flashed / flash

7.6%Flash assists

7.44HE damage / grenade

1.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4868 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.0775% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	16–14	-0.03	19%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.05	16%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.13	22%	22 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.03	37%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.01	26%	22 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	21%	22 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.02	21%	22 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	18%	22 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.04	13%	21 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	26%	21 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.03	23%	21 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.07	23%	21 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.04	14%	21 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.04	35%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.01	15%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.04	22%	21 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.01	21%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	13%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	23%	20 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.10	14%	20 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.04	18%	20 Aug →
anubis	7–5	-0.07	43%	20 Aug →
mirage	15–15	-0.02	22%	18 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.05	15%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	20%	18 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	27%	18 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.03	22%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.09	18%	17 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.02	26%	17 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.01	20%	17 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.06	20%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	33%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.05	19%	16 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.03	16%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	23%	16 Aug →
cache	13–16	0.02	18%	16 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.09	43%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.04	30%	15 Aug →
anubis	16–14	0.09	26%	15 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	18%	15 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.13	33%	15 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.02	20%	15 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.06	16%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.03	23%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.05	32%	14 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.04	20%	14 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.05	23%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.02	30%	14 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	28%	14 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.03	22%	14 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.05	27%	14 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	28%	13 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	19%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.03	22%	13 Aug →
ancient	16–13	-0.02	18%	10 Aug →
inferno	12–16	-0.03	15%	10 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.03	21%	7 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.00	16%	6 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.03	31%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–2	-0.04	35%	6 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.10	19%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.08	28%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.14	33%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.05	32%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	33%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.06	28%	5 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.11	0%	5 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.02	18%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.01	22%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.05	33%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	21%	3 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.04	12%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	20%	3 Aug →
mirage	0–3	-0.04	0%	3 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.02	27%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.01	27%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.11	27%	3 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.06	28%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.24	33%	3 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	16%	3 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.12	28%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–2	-0.02	23%	2 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.01	20%	2 Aug →
mirage	3–8	0.06	28%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.02	15%	30 Jul →
cache	16–13	0.06	22%	25 Jul →
dust2	1–9	-0.05	33%	23 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	21%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.04	17%	20 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.01	20%	20 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	26%	20 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.03	17%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.00	18%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.03	30%	16 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.04	21%	14 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.03	14%	14 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.07	24%	4 Jul →
ancient	14–16	-0.02	17%	4 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.00	37%	4 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	19%	2 Jul →