"СТЕНАТА"

"СТЕНАТА" — CS2 Stats

BG76561198136704665[U:1:176438937]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,045Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,952Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,367Top 10% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11320 of 261617 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,367 +3,164 31 Aug – 12 Nov · 26 days played
19,88026,367peak 26,36731 Aug12 Nov
26,422Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,721Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
21Days played since 2026-07-19

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 26,367
  • +2,400 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,633 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches83122−39
Win rate60%50%+10pp
K/D1.311.28+0.03
Headshot %34%39%−4pp

Measured 18 Oct 2026 → 14 Nov 2026; previous 15 Sep 2026 → 18 Oct 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate42.1%45.7%46.8%4.7% short
Shot accuracy13.6%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.251.051.06above
Match win rate42.1%45.7%46.3%4.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG"СТЕНАТА"FACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER26,367 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,721csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning77
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–46–2Last 10052%Win rateLWWWTLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.06 avg rating · −5.7pp headshot accuracy · +83ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 463ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility3.4
Positioning7.7
Opening Duels7.4
Clutch4.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning7.7
Utility3.4
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels8.2
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time474ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 491ms → last ⅓ avg 474ms
Headshot accuracy14.2%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 13.7% → last ⅓ avg 14.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–6 · inferno, 8 Nov →
29%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · inferno, 8 Nov →
313msFastest reaction time · 12–16 · dust2, 20 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 28 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
10–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 14dust2Weakest map · 35% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C238–1535%0.04
mirageA1710–759%0.02
infernoA159–660%0.04
ancientS1410–471%0.05
nukeA138–562%0.04
anubisC114–736%0.00
cacheC73–443%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

120,863Lifetime kills
1.25K/D · Top 25% of Level 7 players
5,014Matches
42.1%Match win rate
42.1%Headshot %
13.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
13,144MVPs
1,952Hours (in match)
3,161Bombs planted
1,222Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4740,470
AWP6,905
P2503,761
MP73,617
UMP-452,996
P902,358

Lifetime map wins

10,800inferno
7,528dust2
3,810nuke
926train
702cbble
356office
303vertigo
156lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

33Matches
67%Win rate
1.28Avg K/D
101.7ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1060%0.9716.3
Inferno5100%1.3923.2
Nuke560%1.3518.8
Ancient475%1.2024.8
Anubis333%1.1119.3
Overpass333%1.4622.7
Dust22100%1.8020.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.8%Headshot accuracy
36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.2%Spray accuracy
72.4%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
468msReaction time
61.9%T opening success
63.5%CT opening success
0.36Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
12.16HE damage / grenade
2.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.8463% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.36 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage12–16-0.037%12 Nov →
anubis13–4-0.0812%12 Nov →
inferno16–130.0415%11 Nov →
mirage13–40.018%11 Nov →
dust215–15-0.0310%11 Nov →
mirage7–13-0.016%11 Nov →
dust216–14-0.0113%10 Nov →
cache13–40.077%10 Nov →
dust211–130.0213%10 Nov →
cache7–13-0.0210%10 Nov →
inferno13–20.1523%10 Nov →
anubis8–00.050%10 Nov →
nuke12–16-0.0418%8 Nov →
ancient13–40.0418%8 Nov →
dust211–13-0.0717%8 Nov →
ancient13–50.0511%8 Nov →
inferno13–50.0714%8 Nov →
inferno13–60.2015%8 Nov →
dust213–100.0723%8 Nov →
nuke10–130.0218%8 Nov →
anubis5–13-0.0411%8 Nov →
mirage13–80.0218%8 Nov →
inferno4–13-0.0029%8 Nov →
nuke13–70.019%8 Nov →
inferno8–130.0813%6 Nov →
anubis13–40.0213%6 Nov →
cache10–130.0415%4 Nov →
mirage13–110.0611%4 Nov →
inferno1–13-0.0715%4 Nov →
nuke13–40.1622%4 Nov →
cache13–3-0.0219%4 Nov →
ancient13–60.0420%4 Nov →
inferno13–7-0.0219%4 Nov →
dust213–60.1614%3 Nov →
nuke13–110.0618%3 Nov →
dust213–100.0410%3 Nov →
anubis6–13-0.066%3 Nov →
ancient13–110.077%3 Nov →
ancient13–30.0912%2 Nov →
mirage13–90.086%2 Nov →
nuke13–110.0917%2 Nov →
mirage13–110.0515%2 Nov →
cache7–130.0617%1 Nov →
ancient13–50.087%1 Nov →
inferno3–13-0.0121%28 Oct →
anubis7–130.047%28 Oct →
inferno13–90.0618%28 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0220%28 Oct →
mirage13–10.097%28 Oct →
inferno16–12-0.0024%27 Oct →
dust213–20.0411%22 Oct →
mirage4–130.0712%21 Oct →
dust27–130.0326%21 Oct →
dust211–130.077%21 Oct →
ancient11–130.0210%21 Oct →
ancient16–130.0210%20 Oct →
inferno13–20.0810%20 Oct →
dust212–16-0.0221%20 Oct →
nuke13–16-0.0022%20 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0512%19 Oct →
mirage16–130.089%19 Oct →
dust26–130.029%19 Oct →
nuke11–130.0417%19 Oct →
ancient13–70.0512%19 Oct →
anubis3–130.0110%19 Oct →
inferno13–90.0616%19 Oct →
anubis12–160.0110%19 Oct →
nuke7–130.0613%19 Oct →
nuke13–110.1120%15 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.043%15 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.026%15 Oct →
cache13–60.1015%14 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0114%14 Oct →
nuke16–14-0.016%14 Oct →
cache12–16-0.0317%13 Oct →
nuke13–100.049%13 Oct →
dust211–130.0314%13 Oct →
dust27–130.059%12 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0117%12 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0314%12 Oct →
dust212–160.0215%12 Oct →
mirage13–70.0223%12 Oct →
anubis16–140.1221%11 Oct →
ancient13–40.1520%11 Oct →
dust211–130.1517%11 Oct →
mirage10–130.0212%11 Oct →
ancient15–150.1111%11 Oct →
dust213–70.1111%11 Oct →
dust23–130.0612%11 Oct →
dust212–16-0.0014%11 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0717%11 Oct →
dust211–130.0422%11 Oct →
mirage13–50.0115%11 Oct →
dust213–70.1711%11 Oct →
inferno5–70.0321%11 Oct →
dust210–130.0313%10 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.069%10 Oct →
ancient13–60.0215%10 Oct →
dust213–5-0.019%10 Oct →
nuke13–110.028%10 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.