Sérens

Sérens — CS2 Stats

FR76561198126568396[U:1:166302668]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,033Tracked matches67%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,778Purple band · top ~21.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 973 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,778 +1,388 20 Aug – 17 Oct · 38 days played
13,87918,042peak 18,04220 Aug17 Oct
Faceit ELO: 973 +0 2 Sept – 17 Sept · 3 observations
973973peak 9732 Sept17 Sept
18,097Peak Premier in tracked matches
973Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-08-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 973
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 78 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,264 below peak (18,042)
  • +922 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,222 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSérensFACEITLevel 4 · 973 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER16,778 · Purple bandPEAK ELO973csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim53
Positioning50
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53–43–4Last 10053%Win rateWWWWWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.06 avg rating · −3.4pp headshot accuracy · −27ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Last 10

  • 9–1 · 90% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 20

  • 15–5 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim5.3
Utility4.2
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch4.8

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 636ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.3
Positioning5.0
Utility4.2
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time641ms−3ms
first ⅓ avg 644ms → last ⅓ avg 641ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–0 · inferno, 1 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · vertigo, 8 Sept →
484msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · inferno, 4 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 1 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W8Current streak
10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 12anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2110–1148%-0.00
dust2S2013–765%-0.02
mirageB178–947%-0.02
nukeB179–853%-0.02
ancientS128–467%0.01
anubisC52–340%-0.00
cacheC52–340%-0.01
fachwerk—10–10%0.06
vertigo—10–10%-0.03
eldorado—11–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

61Matches
54%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
70.7ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1457%1.0815.8
Mirage1118%0.7913.1
Ancient1070%0.9013.7
Nuke757%0.9514.0
Cache633%0.7111.5
Anubis560%0.8011.4
Dust2475%0.6611.0
Vertigo4100%1.1314.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.6%Spray accuracy
77.6%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
636msReaction time
35.0%T opening success
50.5%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
2.8%Flash assists
7.97HE damage / grenade
1.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 1.8502 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.017% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis16–140.0010%17 Oct →
ancient13–100.0916%17 Oct →
mirage13–70.0718%16 Oct →
cache9–10.0519%16 Oct →
inferno13–60.0519%16 Oct →
nuke13–70.028%15 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0119%14 Oct →
ancient13–60.0410%13 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0819%13 Oct →
mirage13–40.0211%12 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0319%12 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0323%12 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0418%10 Oct →
nuke12–160.0222%10 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0418%10 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0616%6 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0823%6 Oct →
inferno13–80.0215%5 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0118%4 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0513%4 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0716%3 Oct →
ancient6–130.0215%3 Oct →
nuke13–3-0.015%2 Oct →
inferno13–10.0512%2 Oct →
anubis13–100.0319%2 Oct →
inferno13–90.0331%30 Sept →
dust213–20.0024%30 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0639%29 Sept →
ancient0–13-0.0225%29 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.048%29 Sept →
cache13–160.0820%26 Sept →
nuke12–12-0.079%26 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0414%26 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0422%26 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0315%25 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0113%25 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0326%25 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0511%24 Sept →
dust213–8-0.1112%24 Sept →
dust213–50.0214%23 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0410%23 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.084%22 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0712%22 Sept →
dust213–90.017%20 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0315%20 Sept →
nuke13–50.0515%19 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0417%18 Sept →
nuke13–90.009%17 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0310%17 Sept →
dust213–40.0529%16 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0114%13 Sept →
fachwerk4–130.0624%11 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0533%11 Sept →
cache5–13-0.1110%10 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0715%10 Sept →
ancient13–60.0210%10 Sept →
dust216–140.016%10 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0012%9 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0211%9 Sept →
inferno5–90.0138%9 Sept →
vertigo6–13-0.0350%8 Sept →
mirage16–120.0830%8 Sept →
ancient16–130.0111%8 Sept →
inferno11–130.0111%8 Sept →
inferno7–9-0.0416%8 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.049%5 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.1120%5 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0214%5 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0523%5 Sept →
inferno13–20.0015%4 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0229%4 Sept →
nuke9–130.0310%3 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0111%3 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0517%2 Sept →
inferno15–150.0125%1 Sept →
nuke13–70.0022%1 Sept →
inferno13–00.1422%1 Sept →
inferno9–7-0.0512%1 Sept →
eldorado9–50.0736%1 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0516%29 Aug →
mirage12–16-0.054%29 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0810%28 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0219%28 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0216%28 Aug →
ancient13–40.0216%28 Aug →
dust25–13-0.086%26 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0914%25 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0424%25 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.006%25 Aug →
dust213–70.0227%24 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0711%24 Aug →
dust213–50.0320%23 Aug →
ancient13–100.0322%23 Aug →
inferno11–130.0324%23 Aug →
nuke13–80.0815%23 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0419%22 Aug →
inferno13–60.0820%22 Aug →
anubis5–130.009%21 Aug →
mirage13–100.0514%21 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0416%20 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.