Michoko — CS2 Stats

76561197998473649[U:1:38207921]✓ No bans

626Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating14,156Blue band · top ~32.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#18950 of 29088 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMichokoFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER14,156 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning44
Utility22

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47494Last 10047%Win rateLLLWWWLWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim6.4
Aggression3.9
Utility2.2
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch7.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.4
Utility2.2
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time550ms−46ms
first ⅓ avg 596ms → last ⅓ avg 550ms
Headshot accuracy14.9%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.0% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — cache 13–3
131Biggest win — ancient
3Longest win streak
L3Current streak
69In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 13anubisWeakest map · 0% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B21111052%-0.01
infernoC1771041%0.00
ancientS139469%-0.03
mirageA116555%0.00
nukeA106460%-0.03
cacheD103730%-0.02
anubisD8080%-0.02
overpassC52340%-0.03
vertigo31233%-0.02
train220100%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

14Matches
64%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
68.0ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

58%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Cache540%0.8312.0
Ancient367%0.9110.3
Anubis367%1.3218.0
Inferno2100%1.0913.5
Nuke1100%1.3117.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.8%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.1%Spray accuracy
74.3%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
546msReaction time
24.1%T opening success
45.3%CT opening success
0.25Enemies flashed / flash
1.6%Flash assists
8.01HE damage / grenade
3.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.8038% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2538 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.0732% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo6–13-0.0357%29 Aug
dust29–13-0.0322%29 Aug
anubis10–13-0.062%28 Aug
nuke13–10-0.057%28 Aug
dust213–11-0.0312%28 Aug
inferno13–2-0.079%28 Aug
inferno11–13-0.015%28 Aug
nuke13–6-0.019%28 Aug
ancient12–12-0.038%27 Aug
inferno11–130.0218%27 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0818%27 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0217%27 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0117%27 Aug
anubis7–130.1013%27 Aug
dust213–30.0814%27 Aug
inferno9–130.0416%27 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0215%26 Aug
dust213–7-0.0114%26 Aug
ancient13–10-0.045%26 Aug
inferno4–11-0.0820%26 Aug
cache5–13-0.1311%26 Aug
inferno13–50.0912%25 Aug
dust23–13-0.0813%24 Aug
dust22–13-0.0417%24 Aug
cache1–13-0.0339%24 Aug
dust213–5-0.0314%23 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0412%23 Aug
inferno11–13-0.029%23 Aug
nuke13–8-0.060%23 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0310%23 Aug
dust23–13-0.0129%23 Aug
dust25–130.0315%23 Aug
dust213–80.0414%23 Aug
nuke13–110.0516%22 Aug
inferno13–6-0.053%22 Aug
dust212–12-0.0320%22 Aug
inferno5–130.0421%22 Aug
cache8–130.0213%22 Aug
mirage13–11-0.058%22 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0716%21 Aug
mirage13–100.0211%21 Aug
dust213–70.0520%21 Aug
mirage7–130.0917%21 Aug
dust215–150.0314%20 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0011%20 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0524%19 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0612%19 Aug
dust211–13-0.077%18 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0716%18 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0417%16 Aug
inferno13–60.0418%16 Aug
cache7–130.0120%16 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0222%15 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0233%15 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0726%15 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0625%15 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0413%15 Aug
dust213–30.0733%15 Aug
dust20–11-0.0215%14 Aug
inferno13–100.0318%14 Aug
anubis7–130.0212%14 Aug
cache13–6-0.019%14 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0217%14 Aug
dust213–10-0.0716%16 May
ancient13–10.0219%16 May
cache13–30.1111%16 May
overpass11–13-0.0540%15 May
cache11–13-0.066%15 May
dust27–130.0319%14 May
nuke13–8-0.038%14 May
ancient13–5-0.0416%14 May
cache1–11-0.0824%14 May
cache7–130.0012%14 May
dust213–5-0.0421%14 May
inferno8–13-0.0218%13 May
anubis10–13-0.0020%13 May
ancient13–10.0024%13 May
cache13–5-0.0715%13 May
train13–11-0.0514%13 May
inferno11–130.0512%13 May
ancient13–8-0.0915%12 May
mirage4–13-0.0618%12 May
ancient6–13-0.0711%12 May
inferno13–11-0.0217%12 May
overpass7–13-0.0611%11 May
ancient13–3-0.0035%11 May
dust213–8-0.018%11 May
ancient8–13-0.048%11 May
overpass13–6-0.0011%10 May
inferno9–130.0113%10 May
vertigo13–10-0.0214%10 May
overpass13–50.0418%10 May
overpass2–11-0.0713%10 May
train13–10-0.0411%10 May
mirage13–30.1114%10 May
ancient10–130.0814%9 May
dust213–8-0.0315%9 May
mirage13–70.1014%9 May
vertigo6–13-0.0016%8 May
inferno13–7-0.0110%8 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →