Gorras 닝

Gorras 닝 — CS2 Stats

ES76561198123026868[U:1:162761140]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,493Tracked matches59%Win rate2024Tracked since
2,882Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating27,614Top 5% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3225 of 220833 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,748 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 13 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,614 +4,779 13 May12 Sept · 30 days played
21,33527,773peak 27,77313 May12 Sept
27,839Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,748Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-05-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,748
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 3 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 159 below peak (27,773)
  • -38 over 30 days · steady
  • +2,614 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 2,386 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,912), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate40.2%45.8%46.8%6.6% short
Shot accuracy0.0%12.7%13.0%13.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.021.051.060.04 short
Match win rate49.2%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGorras 닝FACEITLevel 7 · 1,748 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER27,614 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,748csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim96
Positioning56
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY63361Last 10063%Win rateWLTLWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +9.7pp headshot accuracy · +4ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 40%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 20

  • 1361 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 35%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.8 against its own average).

Aim9.6
Utility4.2
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 96 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.6
Positioning5.6
Utility4.2
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time527ms−56ms
first ⅓ avg 583ms → last ⅓ avg 527ms
Headshot accuracy33.3%+9.9%
first ⅓ avg 23.4% → last ⅓ avg 33.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.44Best match rating · 9–1 · vertigo, 16 May
86%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · mirage, 16 Jul
234msFastest reaction time · 3–0 · nuke, 3 Jul
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 3 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

14Longest win streak
44In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

poseidonBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB21111052%0.03
dust2A1610663%0.07
ancientA148657%0.00
mirageS129375%0.05
anubisD93633%0.02
nukeS97278%0.05
poseidonS54180%0.08
cacheS54180%0.07
vertigo43175%0.26
overpass32167%-0.01
office110100%0.10
sanctum110100%0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

59,657Lifetime kills
1.02K/D
3,336Matches
49.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 7 players
40.2%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
7,672MVPs
1,349Hours (in match)
3,808Bombs planted
802Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4718,269
AWP7,914
MAC-102,814
MP92,337
Knife624

Lifetime map wins

9,599inferno
3,626dust2
2,416vertigo
1,955nuke
683train
33office
23italy
17ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

515Matches
50%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
77.2ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno12757%0.9715.0
Ancient10150%0.9614.5
Anubis9549%0.9815.1
Dust26844%0.9214.8
Mirage5852%0.9013.6
Nuke2646%1.0316.3
Overpass1947%0.8914.8
Train1338%0.6511.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.8%Headshot accuracy
41.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.9%Spray accuracy
82.8%Counter-strafing
6.1°Preaim
516msReaction time
38.0%T opening success
56.4%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
9.50HE damage / grenade
4.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4952 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.0232% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–50.0633%16 Sept
inferno8–130.0627%15 Sept
dust212–120.0431%14 Sept
anubis7–130.0139%12 Sept
ancient13–5-0.0222%12 Sept
dust213–70.0945%5 Sept
dust213–00.0150%3 Sept
dust24–130.0242%22 Aug
inferno9–40.1347%22 Aug
poseidon9–40.2258%22 Aug
office13–40.1045%20 Aug
dust213–30.0536%17 Aug
cache13–60.1520%9 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0519%7 Aug
ancient13–100.1627%1 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0238%1 Aug
dust213–100.0618%1 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0617%26 Jul
inferno13–70.1129%25 Jul
inferno9–60.0550%19 Jul
anubis11–130.019%19 Jul
dust214–16-0.0324%19 Jul
inferno10–130.0324%19 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0533%16 Jul
mirage9–50.2250%16 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0386%16 Jul
dust20–130.0175%16 Jul
cache13–70.0734%14 Jul
mirage13–40.0319%12 Jul
cache0–130.050%12 Jul
cache13–100.0821%12 Jul
dust213–100.1022%12 Jul
mirage13–8-0.088%11 Jul
dust216–130.1924%11 Jul
ancient13–80.0837%4 Jul
nuke3–0-0.0550%3 Jul
vertigo13–40.2071%29 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0213%29 Jun
anubis12–160.0319%28 Jun
mirage13–90.0215%24 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0318%24 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0010%24 Jun
ancient13–7-0.038%24 Jun
anubis13–100.0827%24 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0312%24 Jun
nuke13–70.0431%21 Jun
ancient13–10.0315%20 Jun
poseidon2–9-0.1560%20 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0914%14 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0132%14 Jun
overpass13–90.0121%13 Jun
ancient5–130.0442%13 Jun
cache13–4-0.0035%11 Jun
nuke13–20.0513%11 Jun
inferno9–130.0132%9 Jun
inferno6–130.0129%9 Jun
nuke9–30.2228%8 Jun
sanctum9–40.1230%8 Jun
inferno9–40.1632%8 Jun
inferno6–9-0.0226%8 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0116%8 Jun
inferno9–70.1038%7 Jun
vertigo9–10.1738%7 Jun
nuke9–30.1822%7 Jun
poseidon9–50.2446%7 Jun
mirage6–130.1424%3 Jun
overpass16–130.0317%1 Jun
anubis6–130.0138%1 Jun
anubis10–130.0524%1 Jun
inferno13–90.0611%31 May
nuke13–90.0622%31 May
dust28–130.1125%30 May
mirage13–100.0645%30 May
poseidon9–5-0.0346%30 May
overpass5–13-0.0627%30 May
dust213–60.0921%24 May
anubis13–70.0018%22 May
ancient13–90.0524%22 May
vertigo5–90.2320%21 May
inferno1–13-0.074%18 May
inferno13–60.0438%18 May
inferno16–14-0.0023%18 May
poseidon9–70.1235%18 May
dust213–60.1313%16 May
mirage13–70.1024%16 May
inferno13–60.0720%16 May
vertigo9–10.4428%16 May
mirage13–30.0631%15 May
ancient13–90.0318%15 May
inferno13–20.0534%15 May
dust213–20.1329%15 May
nuke13–90.0619%15 May
mirage13–20.1538%15 May
dust213–50.1121%15 May
inferno7–13-0.0221%14 May
mirage11–13-0.049%14 May
ancient9–130.028%14 May
dust214–160.007%14 May
nuke3–13-0.0618%13 May
ancient3–13-0.1114%13 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches14-Win StreakAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →