xer0

xer0 — CS2 Stats

NE76561198119866694[U:1:159600966]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

529Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,472Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 1Top 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 1 among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,363), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 1 medianLevel 2 medianvs Level 2
Headshot rate44.0%40.9%41.3%above
Shot accuracy15.8%14.2%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.870.950.950.08 short
Match win rate44.9%42.1%42.6%above

This profile matches the typical Level 2 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 2 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGxer0FACEITLevel 1STANDINGTop 100.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning50
Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD61–35–4Last 10061%Win rateLLLWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.5pp headshot accuracy · +73ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 700ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 710ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 673ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility3.1
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.3

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 675ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning5.0
Utility3.1
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time672ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 668ms → last ⅓ avg 672ms
Headshot accuracy21.5%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 21.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–1 · office, 12 Dec →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · edin, 7 Feb →
367msFastest reaction time · 2–9 · inferno, 25 Feb →
13–0Biggest win · edin, 7 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
L3Current streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 82% over 49vertigoWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
officeS4940–982%0.01
nukeA159–660%-0.00
infernoA116–555%-0.02
vertigoD61–517%-0.03
dust2A53–260%-0.02
ancient—40–40%-0.02
overpass—30–30%-0.06
mirage—30–30%-0.06
basalt—10–10%0.07
italy—11–0100%-0.01
edin—11–0100%0.03
mills—10–10%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

60,137Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
3,701Matches
44.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 1 players
44.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 1 players
15.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 1 players
7,157MVPs
1,472Hours (in match)
1,647Bombs planted
541Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4722,437
AWP7,145
FAMAS1,235
Tec-91,198
MAC-101,033
P2501,014

Lifetime map wins

9,355dust2
3,840office
2,467vertigo
2,272inferno
1,075nuke
677cbble
451militia
404assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.0%Headshot accuracy
28.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.8%Spray accuracy
86.2%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
675msReaction time
30.5%T opening success
45.4%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
2.5%Flash assists
6.32HE damage / grenade
8.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4069 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.4614% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategy →Vertigo grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke8–13-0.0116%7 Nov →
vertigo7–13-0.0810%7 Nov →
nuke14–160.0329%5 Nov →
office13–40.0226%3 Nov →
ancient14–16-0.0421%3 Nov →
nuke13–9-0.0530%2 Nov →
office5–13-0.0815%9 Mar →
office5–130.0138%9 Mar →
dust27–13-0.0422%8 Mar →
overpass6–13-0.0717%8 Mar →
dust27–13-0.0314%8 Mar →
mirage10–13-0.0122%8 Mar →
ancient9–13-0.0030%8 Mar →
inferno6–13-0.0721%8 Mar →
dust213–60.0124%8 Mar →
inferno13–9-0.0418%8 Mar →
nuke13–40.0735%8 Mar →
office13–9-0.0319%7 Mar →
office13–9-0.0026%7 Mar →
inferno6–13-0.098%4 Mar →
inferno4–13-0.0325%4 Mar →
office6–13-0.0423%3 Mar →
vertigo12–12-0.0310%3 Mar →
office13–3-0.0311%2 Mar →
nuke8–13-0.0433%2 Mar →
basalt9–130.0726%1 Mar →
office13–6-0.0516%1 Mar →
office13–6-0.018%1 Mar →
nuke13–90.0218%1 Mar →
office13–6-0.0516%1 Mar →
office13–50.0126%1 Mar →
office13–20.0332%25 Feb →
office13–11-0.0124%25 Feb →
ancient3–13-0.0613%25 Feb →
inferno2–90.0538%25 Feb →
inferno13–110.0233%25 Feb →
nuke13–30.0411%25 Feb →
office13–70.0220%23 Feb →
inferno13–9-0.0321%23 Feb →
nuke7–13-0.0116%21 Feb →
office13–70.0325%21 Feb →
office13–40.0331%21 Feb →
office13–80.0528%21 Feb →
inferno14–16-0.0613%20 Feb →
ancient15–150.0314%20 Feb →
inferno13–2-0.0210%20 Feb →
nuke13–6-0.0315%20 Feb →
office13–90.0013%20 Feb →
office13–30.0415%20 Feb →
office13–6-0.0524%20 Feb →
office13–50.0731%18 Feb →
office12–12-0.0316%18 Feb →
office13–10.0622%18 Feb →
office13–6-0.0420%13 Feb →
office13–110.1018%13 Feb →
office13–11-0.0214%12 Feb →
office13–10-0.0113%12 Feb →
italy13–6-0.0121%10 Feb →
office13–40.0333%10 Feb →
edin13–00.0343%7 Feb →
dust213–11-0.0518%7 Feb →
office4–13-0.0230%7 Feb →
office13–8-0.0216%7 Feb →
office9–130.0113%6 Feb →
office7–13-0.0414%6 Feb →
mirage11–13-0.0614%2 Feb →
nuke6–13-0.0821%2 Feb →
overpass4–13-0.0817%10 Jan →
office13–100.0126%10 Jan →
office13–7-0.0217%10 Jan →
office13–10.0426%10 Jan →
office13–70.0223%10 Jan →
office13–9-0.0126%10 Jan →
inferno13–4-0.0329%9 Jan →
office13–90.0222%8 Jan →
office12–120.0331%8 Jan →
office13–6-0.0314%8 Jan →
mirage2–13-0.0917%8 Jan →
inferno13–60.0426%8 Jan →
nuke13–20.0327%5 Jan →
dust213–5-0.0126%5 Jan →
nuke5–12-0.0219%2 Jan →
vertigo9–13-0.0414%1 Jan →
office13–40.0627%23 Dec →
office13–110.0325%23 Dec →
office11–13-0.0310%22 Dec →
office13–10.1017%12 Dec →
office13–50.0417%12 Dec →
office13–20.019%12 Dec →
office13–100.0218%29 Nov →
office11–30.0314%29 Nov →
office13–4-0.0029%28 Nov →
overpass3–13-0.016%27 Sept →
vertigo8–13-0.064%27 Sept →
vertigo13–30.0812%22 Sept →
mills11–130.0725%21 Sept →
nuke13–100.0114%21 Sept →
vertigo1–7-0.0312%9 Sept →
nuke13–60.0120%9 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0318%6 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.