ToAsty

ToAsty — CS2 Stats

CA76561198118828572[U:1:158562844]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,069Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,723Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Sep 2026 (30 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+168Tracked matches · now 1,069
+5.6ppWin rate · 44.4% → 50.0%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,392 +0 30 Aug – 5 Sept · 2 observations
1,3921,392peak 1,39230 Aug5 Sept
1,392Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
18Days played since 2026-08-30

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches169——
Win rate49%——
K/D1.23——
Headshot %59%——

Measured 11 Sep 2026 → 11 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,885), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate56.1%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy18.0%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.021.051.060.04 short
Match win rate44.6%45.7%46.3%1.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGToAstyFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,392csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning75
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–40–12Last 10048%Win rateWLLTLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +0.8pp headshot accuracy · −3ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 576ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility5.7
Positioning7.5
Opening Duels6.6
Clutch1.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 67% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning7.5
Utility5.7
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels8.5
Win Impact5.0

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time593ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 610ms → last ⅓ avg 593ms
Headshot accuracy25.0%+3.9%
first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 25.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.41Best match rating · 13–0 · mirage, 26 Sept →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · nuke, 5 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · mirage, 26 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 26 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
4–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 5nukeWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB6632–3448%0.03
nukeD124–833%0.03
dust2D62–433%0.01
cacheA53–260%0.02
anubis—42–250%0.03
inferno—21–150%-0.02
train—21–150%0.03
ancient—22–0100%0.01
vertigo—11–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

84,210Lifetime kills
1.02K/D
3,037Matches
44.6%Match win rate
56.1%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players
18.0%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 7 players
10,956MVPs
1,723Hours (in match)
2,077Bombs planted
1,109Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4730,107
AWP5,506
Knife1,877
MAC-101,456
MP91,294

Lifetime map wins

4,449inferno
4,098dust2
1,193nuke
776train
745vertigo
362cbble
81lake
66stmarc

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

768Matches
52%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
79.8ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7036%0.9516.3
Anubis3563%0.9015.4
Ancient2442%0.8517.5
Dust22143%0.9616.7
Inferno1844%1.1017.6
Nuke1436%0.9216.4
Vertigo475%0.8116.5
Train10%0.6714.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.9%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.7%Spray accuracy
85.8%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
585msReaction time
67.4%T opening success
60.8%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
8.96HE damage / grenade
14.71Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–40.0715%10 Oct →
cache10–130.0424%10 Oct →
nuke4–130.0131%10 Oct →
dust212–120.0627%10 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0318%10 Oct →
nuke13–80.0828%10 Oct →
anubis7–130.0927%10 Oct →
nuke13–70.0619%9 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0019%9 Oct →
train9–13-0.0232%9 Oct →
vertigo13–40.0726%9 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0223%9 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0515%9 Oct →
cache13–100.0223%9 Oct →
anubis13–100.0720%9 Oct →
anubis13–90.0318%7 Oct →
mirage4–130.0318%7 Oct →
mirage13–80.0934%7 Oct →
nuke7–130.0415%7 Oct →
nuke5–130.0539%6 Oct →
mirage4–130.0827%6 Oct →
nuke12–120.0433%6 Oct →
mirage13–110.0325%6 Oct →
nuke13–80.0921%6 Oct →
mirage13–60.0924%6 Oct →
mirage7–130.0827%5 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0143%5 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0133%5 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0122%5 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0116%3 Oct →
nuke11–130.0029%3 Oct →
cache13–40.0021%3 Oct →
nuke13–90.0232%3 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0214%2 Oct →
cache9–130.0623%2 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0126%2 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0617%30 Sept →
ancient13–110.0519%30 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0122%30 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0618%30 Sept →
dust213–80.0325%30 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0121%29 Sept →
mirage12–120.0013%29 Sept →
mirage13–90.0316%29 Sept →
mirage12–120.0623%29 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0119%28 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0423%27 Sept →
mirage13–90.0323%27 Sept →
dust212–120.0121%27 Sept →
mirage8–130.1518%27 Sept →
train13–50.0921%27 Sept →
mirage13–90.0116%27 Sept →
mirage6–130.0013%27 Sept →
mirage13–90.1422%27 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0230%27 Sept →
mirage12–120.0224%26 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0614%26 Sept →
mirage13–30.0110%26 Sept →
mirage13–00.4132%26 Sept →
mirage8–130.0623%26 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0336%25 Sept →
mirage12–120.0423%25 Sept →
mirage13–50.0421%25 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0621%25 Sept →
mirage6–130.0822%25 Sept →
mirage2–130.0321%25 Sept →
mirage11–130.0527%25 Sept →
mirage13–50.1326%25 Sept →
mirage13–100.0319%25 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0217%25 Sept →
mirage12–120.0718%25 Sept →
mirage13–90.0915%25 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0016%24 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0611%24 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0213%24 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0222%24 Sept →
mirage13–100.0321%24 Sept →
mirage12–120.0418%24 Sept →
mirage13–50.1024%24 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0115%23 Sept →
mirage13–90.0719%23 Sept →
mirage2–130.0226%23 Sept →
mirage3–130.0524%23 Sept →
mirage13–60.0717%23 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0118%23 Sept →
mirage13–100.0322%22 Sept →
mirage7–130.0526%22 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0230%22 Sept →
mirage12–120.0719%22 Sept →
mirage13–60.0118%22 Sept →
mirage10–130.1429%21 Sept →
mirage13–00.0229%21 Sept →
mirage12–120.0418%21 Sept →
mirage13–60.1133%21 Sept →
mirage4–90.0124%21 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0028%21 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0024%21 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0714%20 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0611%20 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0435%20 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.